Tracking Issue for path-bases · Issue #14355 · rust-lang/cargo (original) (raw)

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

• • GitHub Copilot Write better code with AI
  • GitHub Advanced Security Find and fix vulnerabilities
  • Actions Automate any workflow
  • Codespaces Instant dev environments
  • Issues Plan and track work
  • Code Review Manage code changes
  • Discussions Collaborate outside of code
  • Code Search Find more, search less
• Explore
  • Learning Pathways
  • Events & Webinars
  • Ebooks & Whitepapers
  • Customer Stories
  • Partners
  • Executive Insights
• • GitHub Sponsors Fund open source developers
  • The ReadME Project GitHub community articles
• • Enterprise platform AI-powered developer platform
• Pricing

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Description

Summary

RFC: #3529
Original issue: #9855
Documentation: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#path-bases
Implementation:

• Implement path-bases (RFC 3529) 1/n: path dep and patch support #14360
• Implement path-bases (RFC 3529) 2/n: cargo [add|remove|update] support #14427
• 3/n [patch] table in config support

Introduce shared base directories in Cargo configuration files that in turn enable base-relative path dependencies.

Changes from RFC

• base naming was switched to package / registry naming rules, meaning we support unicode instead of just ASCII (Implement path-bases (RFC 3529) 1/n: path dep and patch support #14360)

Unresolved Issues

• How should each layer (config, eventually manifest) layer? Section-wide, per-field? We should have tests to confirm the approach we have
• Can we switch our existing "make dep paths absolute" to build on top of this? (Implement path-bases (RFC 3529) 1/n: path dep and patch support #14360)
• What exact names we should use for the table (path-bases) and field names (base)?
• What other built-in base paths could be useful?
  • package or current-dir for the directory of the current project?
  • home or user_home for the user's home directory?
  • sysroot for the current rustc sysroot?
• Do we actually want to support the [patch] table? Adding support for [patch] in config files greatly complicates the implementation
• Should base = "workspace" work with implicit workspaces?

Future Extensions

• Add support for declaring path bases in the manifest
  • Motivating example: You have a Git dependency that has a path dependency to one of its submodules. It would be nice if the Git dependency could use a path base to point to the submodule, but currently this is broken as the configuration file in that git dependency is never loaded. See https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2024/08/15/this-development-cycle-in-cargo-1.81.html#path-bases
• Path bases relative to other path bases
• Path dependency with just a base
• Git dependencies

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.