Make const_eval_select a real intrinsic by fee1-dead · Pull Request #100759 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (9358d09): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌ (primary) 0.8% [0.3%, 1.4%] 12
Regressions ❌ (secondary) 2.4% [0.2%, 4.1%] 9
Improvements ✅ (primary) -1.2% [-3.0%, -0.6%] 7
Improvements ✅ (secondary) -1.4% [-1.6%, -1.0%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-3.0%, 1.4%] 19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌ (primary) 9.8% [9.8%, 9.8%] 1
Regressions ❌ (secondary) 2.3% [1.4%, 2.9%] 3
Improvements ✅ (primary) -3.3% [-3.3%, -3.3%] 1
Improvements ✅ (secondary) -3.6% [-4.6%, -2.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.2% [-3.3%, 9.8%] 2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌ (primary) - - 0
Regressions ❌ (secondary) 2.4% [1.7%, 3.8%] 7
Improvements ✅ (primary) -2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1
Improvements ✅ (secondary) - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩2 ↩3
  2. number of relevant changes ↩2 ↩3