Populate effective visibilities in 'rustc_resolve' by Bryanskiy · Pull Request #102026 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)
Finished benchmarking commit (b8b5cae): comparison URL.
Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED
Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.
@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance
Instruction count
This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean1 | range | count2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 1.1% | [0.2%, 5.6%] | 65 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 0.9% | [0.2%, 3.7%] | 32 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | 1.1% | [0.2%, 5.6%] | 65 |
Max RSS (memory usage)
Results
This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean1 | range | count2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | -1.6% | [-1.6%, -1.6%] | 1 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | -1.6% | [-1.6%, -1.6%] | 1 |
Cycles
Results
This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean1 | range | count2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 2.8% | [2.1%, 3.9%] | 9 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 2.9% | [2.2%, 3.9%] | 3 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | 2.8% | [2.1%, 3.9%] | 9 |