rustdoc: migrate item_union to an Askama template by notriddle · Pull Request #109925 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)
Finished benchmarking commit (dbff1b7044fb065a8a50d216265d11a502e63ade): comparison URL.
Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed
Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.
@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression
Instruction count
This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean | range | count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 0.3% | [0.3%, 0.4%] | 2 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
Max RSS (memory usage)
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
Cycles
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.