large_assignments: Lint on specific large args passed to functions by Enselic · Pull Request #116520 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (92f2e0a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌ (primary) 0.4% [0.2%, 0.8%] 45
Regressions ❌ (secondary) 0.6% [0.2%, 2.1%] 8
Improvements ✅ (primary) - - 0
Improvements ✅ (secondary) -6.0% [-6.0%, -6.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [0.2%, 0.8%] 45

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌ (primary) 1.6% [1.1%, 2.1%] 3
Regressions ❌ (secondary) - - 0
Improvements ✅ (primary) -2.4% [-2.4%, -2.3%] 2
Improvements ✅ (secondary) -3.0% [-4.5%, -1.8%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.0% [-2.4%, 2.1%] 5

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌ (primary) - - 0
Regressions ❌ (secondary) - - 0
Improvements ✅ (primary) - - 0
Improvements ✅ (secondary) -4.3% [-4.3%, -4.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 663.55s -> 663.149s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 308.22 MiB -> 308.26 MiB (0.01%)