Add a scheme for moving away from `extern "rust-intrinsic"` entirely by oli-obk · Pull Request #120675 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (2eeff46): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.6%	[0.2%, 1.0%]	93
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.2%, 2.4%]	28
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.6%	[0.2%, 1.0%]	93

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.9%	[0.8%, 16.7%]	7
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	7.9%	[6.2%, 11.2%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-3.9%, -1.0%]	9
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-4.2%, -1.5%]	31
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-3.9%, 16.7%]	16

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[3.0%, 3.2%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.