Bump compiler `cc` to 1.2.5 by jieyouxu · Pull Request #134505 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (4c40c89): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-7.6%, -0.1%]	244
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.7%	[-1.4%, -0.1%]	196
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-7.6%, -0.1%]	244

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -3.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.6%	[-3.6%, -3.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary -1.4%, secondary -2.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	6.4%	[6.4%, 6.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-9.5%, -0.7%]	41
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-2.4%, -1.3%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-9.5%, 6.4%]	42

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.