[generic_assert] "Constify" the Debug trait by c410-f3r · Pull Request #135712 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation7 Commits1 Checks12 Files changed

Conversation

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters

[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})

c410-f3r

cc #44838

With the merging of #135423, it now appears possible to start "constifying" arbitrary traits. Therefore, I am starting the "constification" of all the traits involved in the execution of the formatting system to unblock generic_assert.

const _: () = { panic!("{}", "foo"); };

r? @rust-lang/project-const-traits

@c410-f3r

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

T-libs

Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

Jan 19, 2025

@compiler-errors

@compiler-errors

And no, #135423 does not complete the picture unfortunately. We still need to enforce const stability of calls in MIR.

@c410-f3r

@compiler-errors

No, I'm so sorry @c410-f3r, I misread this as "constify the Default trait", not the Debug trait.

I will reopen this because I was blind and can't read the difference between Default and Debug. However, this is still blocked like that other one.

@c410-f3r

Don't worry! After all, keeping up with the relentless pace of delivering so many important features in short periods of time is no easy task and it takes its toll. BTW, looking forward to see the stabilization of RTN 🎉

@fee1-dead fee1-dead added S-blocked

Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Jan 22, 2025

@Sky9x

just wondering how this is useful... all you can do in a const fmt fn is return without printing anything, and I don't think the Formatter writing methods will become const any time soon (#44838 (comment))

@c410-f3r

Labels

S-blocked

Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

T-libs

Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.