rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (0134651): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.7%	[0.7%, 0.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-2.0%, -2.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.3%, secondary 0.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[0.4%, 1.6%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.3%	[1.1%, 1.7%]	8
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.6%, -0.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[-0.6%, 1.6%]	8

Cycles

Results (primary -0.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.