Use multiple returns in MIR if it saves a block; still have only one in LLVM by scottmcm · Pull Request #138144 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)
Finished benchmarking commit (be9306c): comparison URL.
Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below
Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.
Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.
@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression
Instruction count
This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
| mean | range | count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 0.7% | [0.3%, 1.3%] | 3 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 0.2% | [0.2%, 0.2%] | 1 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | -0.6% | [-0.7%, -0.6%] | 2 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | -0.4% | [-0.4%, -0.4%] | 1 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.1% | [-0.7%, 1.3%] | 5 |
Max RSS (memory usage)
Results (primary -2.8%, secondary 2.3%)
This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean | range | count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 3.4% | [1.6%, 5.3%] | 2 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 2.3% | [2.3%, 2.3%] | 1 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | -4.6% | [-7.8%, -2.4%] | 7 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | -2.8% | [-7.8%, 5.3%] | 9 |
Cycles
Results (primary -0.7%, secondary -0.9%)
This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean | range | count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 1.5% | [1.5%, 1.5%] | 1 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | - | - | 0 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | -1.4% | [-2.3%, -1.0%] | 3 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | -0.9% | [-0.9%, -0.9%] | 1 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.7% | [-2.3%, 1.5%] | 4 |
Binary size
Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.0%)
This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
| mean | range | count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regressions ❌ (primary) | 0.1% | [0.0%, 0.2%] | 24 |
| Regressions ❌ (secondary) | 0.2% | [0.0%, 0.6%] | 4 |
| Improvements ✅ (primary) | -0.1% | [-1.1%, -0.0%] | 45 |
| Improvements ✅ (secondary) | -0.1% | [-0.3%, -0.0%] | 14 |
| All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.0% | [-1.1%, 0.2%] | 69 |
Bootstrap: 765.289s -> 766.233s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 362.07 MiB -> 362.04 MiB (-0.01%)