Stabilize `alloc_layout_extra` by GrigorenkoPV · Pull Request #148769 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

Finished benchmarking commit (7b5d187): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.1%, 1.0%]	18
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.5%, -0.1%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.5%, -0.1%]	46
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.5%, 0.5%]	6

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[0.7%, 3.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.6%	[-2.5%, 3.7%]	3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary 0.1%)