[beta] Backport rust-analyzer proc macro server "disable postcard use temporarily" by lnicola · Pull Request #149799 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)

@lnicola

@Veykril @lnicola

@rustbot

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

@rustbot

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

@lnicola

@bors rollup=always

(EDIT: not actually sure whether beta backports can be rolled up)

@jieyouxu

EDIT: not actually sure whether beta backports can be rolled up

They must not be rolled up (for directly beta-branch targetting PRs, not the main-targetting ones that are intended to be cherry-picked after they merge into main), because PRs in a rollup target main, but this beta backport is targetting the beta branch directly.

@bors rollup=never

@jieyouxu

@lnicola also wait, is this intended for 1.92.0

@lnicola

@jieyouxu

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

(Also random tip: IIRC this message will be suppressed if you write "[beta]" in the backport PR title :D)

[[assign.warn_non_default_branch.exceptions]]
title = "[beta"
branch = "beta"
[[assign.warn_non_default_branch.exceptions]]
title = "[stable"
branch = "stable"

@lnicola lnicola changed the titleBackport rust-analyzer proc macro server "disable postcard use temporarily" [beta] Backport rust-analyzer proc macro server "disable postcard use temporarily"

Dec 9, 2025

@lnicola

So how does this work, do we have to wait until 1.92 comes out, or can we merge it now?

@jieyouxu

So how does this work, do we have to wait until 1.92 comes out, or can we merge it now?

My understanding this that this should be okay to merge since we prepped the beta branch already as part of the release process (#149760), but worth double-checking with release team #t-release1

EDIT: #t-release > 1.93-targetting r-a beta backport

Footnotes

  1. Since I have to wrap my head around which is which every time 😆

@lnicola

We can merge this now, right?

@bors r+

@bors

📌 Commit 51da96d has been approved by lnicola

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Dec 14, 2025

@bors

@bors

@lnicola lnicola deleted the backport-disable-postcard branch

December 14, 2025 21:51