| qc, mean \[ 95 % CI\] | 1.39×10−2 \[ 8.10×10−3−2.03×10−2\] | 1.96×10−2 \[ 1.11×10−2ͨ...
| Parameters | School A | School B | | qc, mean \[ 95 % CI\] | 1.39×10−2 \[ 8.10×10−3−2.03×10−2\] | 1.96×10−2 \[ 1.11×10−2−2.89×10−2\] | | qg, mean \[ 95 % CI\] | 4.36×10−3 \[ 9.61×10−4−8.34×10−3\] | 4.61×10−3 \[ 2.98×10−4−1.15×10−2\] |
| qs, mean \[ 95 % CI\] | 9.52×10−4 \[ 2.87×10−4−1.82×10−3\] | 2.96×10−3 \[ 1.64×10−3−4.45×10−3\] | | ε, mean \[ 95 % CI\] | 3.70×10−3 \[ 1.95×10−3−5.69×10−3\] | 2.65×10−3 \[ 1.37×10−3−4.20×10−3\] |
6c338e811af9402b98f215c9759761bc6c3def789a9ad83789f208d267d0006a.png
| Dependent variable | ANC4 | SBA | IFD | | Density variable | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | | Density | 0.003\*\*\* | 0.002\*\* | 0.004...
| Dependent variable | ANC4 | SBA | IFD | | Density variable | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | | Density | 0.003\*\*\* | 0.002\*\* | 0.004...
| Dependent variable | ANC4 | SBA | IFD | | Density variable | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | % "urban" | score | | # 4-wheel vehicles, per capita | 0.035 | 0...
8be7af498b313fcdc872c170f32425cebc75098e7c2119ea1b47a88c691245eb.png
| Weeks | Daily dose | Niaspan FCT dosage | | Initial titration schedule | 0 to 4 | 500 mg | One 500 mg tablet at bedtime | | 5 to 8 | 1,000 mg | One 1,000 mg tablet or two 500 mg tablets at bedtime | 9 ...
| Weeks | Daily dose | Niaspan FCT dosage | | Initial titration schedule | 0 to 4 | 500 mg | One 500 mg tablet at bedtime | | 5 to 8 | 1,000 mg | One 1,000 mg tablet or two 500 mg tablets at bedtime | 9 ...
| Weeks | Daily dose | Niaspan FCT dosage | | Initial titration schedule | 13 to 24 | 2,000 mg | Two 1,000 mg tablets at bedtime |
60f7079ba6d811dea21e96d519da45548135509ecd489525770ce40514ffb5a0.png
| Combination | TP | FP | TN | FN | sensitivity (HCC = 50) | specificity (LC = 41) | TPP | TPN | LR | | afp | 28 | 0 | 41 | 22 | 56.00% | 100.00% | 100.0% | 65.10% | - | a...
| Combination | TP | FP | TN | FN | sensitivity (HCC = 50) | specificity (LC = 41) | TPP | TPN | | afp | 28 | 0 | 41 | 22 | 56.00% | 100.00% | 100.0% | 65.10% | | afp+piv | 47 | | LR | | - | | 4.82 | | 4 | | 2.68 | | 2.31 | | 2.15 | | 1.85 | | 1.53 | | 1.46 | | 1.4 | | 1.27 | | 1.27 | | 1.24 | 1.05da8512c3da0b345d6c822eda63edeec3e5bd7bbf92e06c067178beb54447138f.png
| Variable | ORa (IC95%) | pa value | ORB (IC95%) | pb value | | PSVI | Part 1 | | Low PSVI | 1 | < 0.01 | | | | | Variable | ORa (IC95%) | pa value | ORB (IC95%) | pb value | | PSVI | Part 1 | | Low PSVI | 1 | < 0.01 | | | | Middle PSVI | 1.21 (1.21; 1.21) | < 0.01 | | Variable | ORa (IC95%) | pa value | ORB (IC95%) | pb value | | Age group | 15–19 | 1.09 (1.09; 109) | < 0.01 | 1.04 (1, 1.08) | | | Part 3 | | Family income | Hous...
c26a54401dc062f7ff2aff801c23eccf6a5c71206acd06bc029182e31ca1f01d.png
| | Group I(n = 25) | Group P(n = 25) | P value | | Desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) | 3 (12%) | 2 (8%) | 1.000 | | Gastric insufflations | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 1.000 | | Aspiration | <...
| Group I(n = 25) | Group P(n = 25) | P value | | Desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) | 3 (12%) | 2 (8%) | 1.000 | | Gastric insufflations | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 1.000 | | Aspiration | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | — | | Group I(n = 25) | Group P(n = 25) | P value | | Bronchospasm | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | — | | Blood stain | 0 (0%) | 2 (8%) | 0.490 |
3df4c15b6e133af47b8de862f86279470a08b80f5332c42d7772054da865abf1.png
| Remaining per-base coverage after B-tail removal | Number of positions with this coverage in the ZR reference (Bv-95nt data) | Number of positions with this coverage in the PhiX reference (PhiX-95nt data) | | 90 to 100% | 41,130 (40.26%) | 4,016 (91.65%) | ...
| Remaining per-base coverage after B-tail removal | Number of positions with this coverage in the ZR reference (Bv-95nt data) | | 90 to 100% | 41,130 (40.26%) | | 80 to 90% | 4,056 (3.97%) | | 60 to 80% | 1,711 (1.67%) | 40 to 6...
| Number of positions with this coverage in the PhiX reference (PhiX-95nt data) | | 4,016 (91.65%) | | 266 (6.07%) | | 100 (2.28%) | | 0 (0.00%) | | 0 (0.00%) | | 0 (0.00%) |
f8e5e3067d00554e8de86b5f0fc0fd401ea4aa43d2cafca8f83aeb2b3c94593a.png
| Parameter | DF | TPC | Antioxidant Capacity | | ABTS | DPPH | CUPRAC | | F | p > F | F | p > <...
| Parameter | DF | TPC | Antioxidant Capacity | | ABTS | DPPH | CUPRAC | | F | p > F | F | p > F | F | p > F | F | | 23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 60 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 6 | 3 | | β11 | 1 | 6.65 | 0.05 \* | 7.59 | 0.04 \* | 0.85 | 0.40 | 7.26 | 0.04\* | | β22 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.75 | ...
903042a25ca43bbf9921d7abf1757d3c6c75af5fb987812cb41cdb01eb670685.png
| Medical categories | Number of species | Citations | Fic | | Tonic | 5 | 38 | 0.89 | | Dermatological | 4 | 120 | 0.97 | | Gastrointestinal | 32 | 433 | 0.92 | | Galactagogue | | Medical categories | Number of species | Citations | | Tonic | 5 | 38 | | Dermatological | 4 | 120 | | Gastrointestinal | 32 | 433 | | Galactagogue | 8 | 86 | | Reproductive | | Fic | | 0.89 | | 0.97 | | 0.92 | | 0.91 | | 0.93 | | 0.89 | | 0.91 | | 0.90 | | 0.85 |
70bf8d7bdd26521240c6df2c0310cd7ece22e69d598f725caf8d4247d3790079.png
| Marker | Peripheral stroma | Central stroma | Anterior stroma | Posterior stroma | | ABCG2 | − | − | − | − | | ABCG5 | − | − | − | − | | ALDH1A1 | | Marker | Peripheral stroma | Central stroma | Anterior stroma | Posterior stroma | | ABCG2 | − | − | − | − | | ABCG5 | − | − | − | − | | ALDH1A1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | | Fibroblast marker | − | − | − | − | | Fibronectin | − | − | − | − | | Ki-67 | − | − | − | − | | Nestin | − | − | − | − | | VE-Cadherin | − | − |
| 18e1b93b8340cf2b853cddc614226757d23d6bdeeef0a3e94530be06efbe04b2.png
| Ezetimibe plus Fenofibrate | Atorvastatin Monotherapy | | | | Baseline | 6 Weeks | % Change | p Value | Baseline | 6 Weeks | % Change | p Value | % Difference | p Value | | Ezetimibe plus Fenofibrate | Atorvastatin Monotherapy | | Baseline | 6 Weeks | % Change | p Value | Baseline | | Total Chol (mmol/L) | 5.9 | 4.4 | -25.1 | < 0.001 | 5.8 | LDL...
| Atorvastatin Monotherapy | | | | 6 Weeks | % Change | p Value | % Difference | p Value | | 4.4 | -24.6 | < 0.001 | -0.4 | 0.806 | | 2.3 | -36.7 | < 0.001 | 2.1 | 0.4642597d9582fe42683d4bcea786ddf46f1cfbd60f5714f6206a665bd779c02c8f.png
| Axis | CoG Position | Linear Acceleration | | First Version | Second Version | First Version | Second Version | | X | 2.4252e−06 | 1.0008e−06 | --\* | --\* | |
| Axi | CoG Position | Linear Acceleration | | First Version | Second Version | First Version | Second Version | |
| s | | | X | 2.4252e−06 | 1.0008e−06 | --\* | --\* | | Y | 1.3992e−05 | 1.3390e−05 | 6.3191e−06 | 5.1146e−06 | | Z | 1.5306e−05 | 4.4980e−06 | 2.7849e−06 | 2.3104e−06 | 834c2f9603f4bacecdf442d509f5486e5987a4f4604b79241771b8f8c29329cd.png
| Over-expressed in melan-a v B16 | Under-expressed in melan-a v B16 | Total | | Upregulated by RA treatment | 71 | 14 | 85 | | Downregulated by RA treatment | 16 | 132 | 151 | | Total | 87 | 149 |
|
|
|
|
| | Over-expressed in melan-a v B16 | Under-expressed in melan-a v B16 | Total |
| Upregulated by RA treatment | 71 | 14 | 85 | | Downregulated by RA treatment | 16 | 132 | 151 | | Total | 87 | 149 | 233 |
af753c587e401fa38d39ab7e2a29990dd85b9cee68ff289a1ee09396b7077482.png
| Characteristics | n (%) | | Patient factors | | | Age (years) | | | ≥ 50 | 68 (30.9) | | < 50 | 152 (69.1) | | Gender | | | Male | 167 (75.9) | Fem...
| Characteristics | n (%) | | Patient factors | | | Age (years) | | | ≥ 50 | 68 (30.9) | | < 50 | 152 (69.1) | | Gender | | | Male | 167 (75.9) | | Female | 53 (24.1...
| 1 | .0) | | N2 | 40 (18.2) | | N3 | 18 (8.2) | | Treatment factors | | | chemotherapy | | | Yes | 190 (86.4) | | No | 30 (13.6) |
1e3d063bd2a22f6d1f3e4a4518b4b8875d54e4ba9ea94bb9cd42726210c2712e.png
| Group | Variable | Lambda | F | DF1 | DF2 | p-value | | SD-Risk | IFN | 0.4841 | 17.5871 | 2 | 33 | < 0.0001 | | SD-Risk | IL-2 | 0.3719 | 27.8637 | 2 | 33 | <...
| Group | Variable | Lambda | F | DF1 | DF2 | p-value | | SD-Risk | IFN | 0.4841 | 17.5871 | 2 | 33 | < 0.0001 |
| Group | Variable | Lambda | F | DF1 | DF2 | p-value | | SD-Risk | IL-2 | 0.3719 | 27.8637 | 2 | 33 | < 0.0001 | | SD-Risk | IL-10 | 0.6091 | 10.5889 | 2 | 33 | 0.0003 | ...
b8be3d5b9226ae98763531e3cc05f3d194628d6863e351cb90e0558a871369fa.png
| line | gene copy number | | WT | 0 | | Sox23 | 6 (12 homozygous) | | Sox42 | 1 (2 homozygous) | | Sox44 | 2 (4 homozygous) |
| gene copy number | | 0 | | 6 (12 homozygous) | | 1 (2 homozygous) | | 2 (4 homozygous) |
3131f597fe5d7c6831f472a1fe5bf587cb8920fc9a4e5c1ef2246381a02416a0.png
| Skill 1 | Skill 2 | Skill 3 | Skill 4 | Skill 5 | Total/Avg | Skill 6 | | Pre-workshop (n = 12) | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 16.7/3.3 | 3.5 | | Post-workshop (n = 7) | 4.6 | 5.0...
| Skill 1 | Skill 2 | Skill 3 | Skill 4 | Skill 5 | Total/Avg | Skill 6 |
| Pre-workshop (n = 12) | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 16.7/3.3 | 3.5 | | Post-workshop (n = 7) | 4.6 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 21.3/4.3 | 2.0 | | p-value | <0.01 | <0.05 | 0.18<...
546526ada8af73eb8b1a7608e2cf49686977324b40c7dcd68f7e33b2a3c80b1d.png
| Index | Placebo group | Zaleplon 10 mg group | Zaleplon 15 mg group | | Scores of SQS | 3.75 ± 1.04 | 5.38 ± 0.92\*\* | 6.00 ± 0.76\*\* | | Scores of SDS | 3.25 ± 1.04 | 4.62 ± 1.41\*<...
| Index | Placebo group | Zaleplon 10 mg group | Zaleplon 15 mg group | | Scores of SQS | 3.75 ± 1.04 | 5.38 ± 0.92\*\* | 6.00 ± 0.76\*\* |
| Index | Placebo group | Zaleplon 10 mg group | Zaleplon 15 mg group | | Scores of SDS | 3.25 ± 1.04 | 4.62 ± 1.41\* | 6.12 ± 0.83\*\*∆ | | Scores of SSS | 2.38 ± 0.92 | 2.12 ± 0.64 | 2.38 ± 0.92 |
a97b1dea321e4959385b0c3c7724ccce8bc379b880263c44c67aba9d2e1544af.png
| Characteristic | No. of patients | % | | Patients evaluable | 40 | 100 | | Age, years | | | | Median | 65 | | | Range | 34–75 | | | Sex | | | Characteristic | No. of patients | % | | Patients evaluable | 40 | 100 | | Age, years | | | | Median | 65 | | | Range | 34–75 | | | Sex | | |
| Characteristic | No. of patients | % | | Male | 24 | 60 | | Female | 16 | 40 | | ECOG PS | | | | 0 | 6 | 15 | | 1 | 27 | 67.5 | | 2 | 7 | 17....
465f25e16086d4dac57994d374e6e51ddac600e80d821e1de256610b56e32983.png
| Patient | Karyotype/Molecular lesion(s) | FAB subgroup | Age at diagnosis | IDO1 status | CR | Relapse | Alive | | UPN #1 | Normal | M2 | 13.0 | Negative | Yes | No | Yes | | UPN #2 | t(8;2...
| Patient | Karyotype/Molecular lesion(s) | | UPN #1 | Normal | | UPN #2 | t(8;21) (q22;q22) | | UPN #3 | Normal | | UPN #4 | Normal | | UPN #5 | Normal | | UPN #6 | Normal | <...
| FAB subgroup | Age at diagnosis | IDO1 status | CR | Relapse | Alive | | M2 | 13.0 | Negative | Yes | No | Yes | | M2 | 13.0 | Negative | Yes | No | Yes | | M1 | 10.0108caffb46f5d2d3b9e391f68e12c6627a9f1696d012fc7506f47a279b244189.png
| Sock-only | Shod | | Subject | r | nMAD | r | nMAD | | 1 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.59 | 0.23 | | 2 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.22 | | 3 | 0.84 | ...
| Sock-only | Shod | | Subject | r | nMAD | r | nMAD | | 1 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.59 | 0.23 | | 2 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.22 | | 3 | 0.84 | ...
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.27 | | 6 | 0.92 | 0.1 | 0.87 | 0.12 | | 7 | 0.85 | 0.14 | 0.83 | 0.13 | | 8 | 0.92 | 0.09 | 0.8 | 0.15 | | 9 | 0.65 | ...
1bb88fd1455395a16cff183d37599c390cee3b1b0af5930f889f36b37f061cb2.png
| Patient | Before | 2 months | 6 months | 1 year | | Righta | Leftb | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | | | | | Patient | Before | 2 months | 6 months | 1 year | | Righta | Leftb | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | | Biceps brachii m...
| 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.42 | | 14 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 2.14 | 1.39 | 1.07 | 0.66 | | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 0.761add04ad3d4466031d7bdd5af31027c428a1c6f028242e592dba1e3960a1317a.png
| Age range | Counta | ERPb | Ratec | Ratiod | 95 % CI | | 4 | 7,594 | 72,820 | 10.4 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | | 5–9 | 100,787 | 340,503 | | Age range | Counta | ERPb | Ratec | Ratiod | 95 % CI | | 4 | 7,594 | 72,820 | 10.4 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | | 5–9 | 100,787 | 340,503 | 29.6 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | <...
| 10–14 | 132,965 | 330,448 | 40.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 15–19 | 81,910 | 355,117 | 23.1 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | | 20–24 | 47,831 | 412,009 | 11.6 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 31779a6c73bacce3fe6e376a74314056faa235bb6555c4b932c17ea33e7da319.png
| | Patients withAlzheimer's disease (n=21) | | Patients withfrontotemporal dementia (n=23) | U | Z | p\* | | M±SD | CI 95% | M±SD | CI 95% |
| Patients withAlzheimer's disease (n=21) | | Patients withfrontotemporal dementia (n=23) | U | Z | p\* | | M±SD | CI 95% | M±SD | CI 95% | |
| Patients withAlzheimer's disease (n=21) | | Patients withfrontotemporal dementia (n=23) | U | Z | p\* | | M±SD | CI 95% | M±SD | CI 95% | 61015fa3438e3f6f3d7105aace6b5df60ab2f5d3acb3e7632bfe8dd12c07e5c0.png
| Concentration range (pg/g lipid) | Second-order (equivalent to minus change in apparent elimination rate in 2006) | First-order (equivalent to minus apparent elimination rate) | | coefficient | p-value | coefficient | <...
| Concentration range (pg/g lipid) | Second-order (equivalent to minus change in apparent elimination rate in 2006) | First-order (equivalent to minus apparent elimination rate) | | coefficient | p-value | coefficient | p-value<...
| Concentration range (pg/g lipid) | Second-order (equivalent to minus change in apparent elimination rate in 2006) | First-order (equivalent to minus apparent elimination rate) | | coefficient | p-value | coefficient | p-value<...
b82b74ede38db7487e6946fe4c11597b8ba733ef06042b74b49534376e8bcebe.png
| N = 1352 | Non-responders n = 909 | Responders n = 443 | p value | | Women, n (%) | 520 (57) | 273 (62) | 0.12 A | | Age, average years (SD) | 41.3 (11.8) | 44.4 (10.8) | 0.05 B | | N = 1352 | Non-responders n = 909 | Responders n = 443 | p value | | Women, n (%) | 520 (57) | 273 (62) | 0.12 A | | Age, average years (SD) | 41.3 (11.8) | 44.4 (10.8) | 0.05 B | | Work n (%) | | | | N = 1352 | Non-responders n = 909 | Responders n = 443 | | Non-RTW | 309 (34) | 146 (33) | | RTW | 548 (60) | 273 (62) | | Old age and disability pension | 50 (6) | 22 (5) | | Died | 2 (0) | 2 ...
aa44cf6c3f9a961ef2307e446b7253cab3fc474c2e7a9ad91b1d682d92c8efb9.png
| Perianal disease prior to pregnancy n = 27 | No perianal disease prior to pregnancy n = 87 | | Mode of childbirth | Vaginal delivery n (%) | Caesarean section n (%) | Vaginal delivery n (%) | Caesarean section n (%) | ...
| Perianal disease prior to pregnancy n = 27 | No perianal disease prior to pregnancy n = 87 | | Mode of childbirth | Vaginal delivery n (%) | Caesarean section n (%) | Vaginal delivery n (%) | Caesarean section n (%) | ...
| Progression perianal disease ≤ 2 years post partum: | 2 (18) | 5 (31) | 3 (5) | 3 (14) | | - Yes | 9 (82) | 9 (56) | 58(94) | 18 (86) | | - No | 0 (0) | 2 (13) | 5 (1) | 0 (0) | | - Not applicab...
21d214ad1e4e3238c3aa6ad4b4b716adae35e514a724e799de69cc970660cfc4.png
| Peptide | Sequence | Mw | pI1 | Net charge | Mean hydrophobicity2 | | KHN20 | KHNLGHGHKHERDQGHGHQR | 2365.5 | 9.99 | +2 | −4.91 | | GHG20 | GHGLGHGHEQQHGLGHGHKF | 2127.2 | 7...
| Peptide | Sequence | Mw | | KHN20 | KHNLGHGHKHERDQGHGHQR | 2365.5 | | GHG20 | GHGLGHGHEQQHGLGHGHKF | 2127.2 | | GHG21 | GHGHKFKLDDDLEHQGGHVLD | 2354.5 | | GGH20 | GGHVLDHGHKHKHGHGHGKH | 2169.3<...
| pI1 | Net charge | Mean hydrophobicity2 | | 9.99 | +2 | −4.91 | | 7.21 | 0 | −2.01 | | 5.63 | −3 | −2.32 | | 9.70 | +2 | −3.44 | | 10.78 | +7 | −5.91 | | 1...
483d9bc63d82a56209d473d293ba38f1616315880c3d6c1e42c576e119a41735.png
| Matching phase | Type of match | Number linked | % | | 1 | Child’s first, middle, and last name & dob and mother’s dob | 5282 | 2.6 % | | 2 | Child’s first, middle initial, and last name & dob and mother’s...
| Matching phase | Type of match | Number linked | % |
| 1 | Child’s first, middle, and last name & dob and mother’s dob | 5282 | 2.6 % | | 2 | Child’s first, middle initial, and last name & dob and mother’s dob | 32094 | 16.0 % | | 3 | Child’s first, middle, and last name & dob | 30351c8c786e697d73021eaa53b2981f842209367d6595154fc3c3110bd98e9f27e0.png
| Number | Authors, year | c | Age, sex | Period (years) | symptoms | Preoperative lab | Treatment | Histological diagnosis | Outcomes | | 1 | Boriani et al, 1978 \[8\] | S1-3 | 18, M | DNMI | Bone pain, weakness...
| Number | Authors, year | c | Age, sex | Period (years) | symptoms | Preoperative lab | | 1 | Boriani et al, 1978 \[8\] | S1-3 | 18, M | DNMI | Bone pain, weakness | Hypophosphatemia, elevated ALP | | 2 | | Treatment | Histological diagnosis | Outcomes | | Complete resection, radiotherapy | Osteosarcoma | NOLF | | Complete resection, supplementation of vitamin D, phosphate, and calcium | Neuroendocrine tumor | NOLF | | Partial resect...
1d6c6d54bc931bbc726f4d9068f717a7b7a9bc930cefed5207aa0fa6357472e4.png
| Antibioticsa | Extracts concentrationb | Bacteria, MIC (μg/mL) and modulating factors (in bracket) | Modulating effect (%)b | | E. coli | E. aerogen...
| Antibioticsa | Extracts concentrationb | Bacteria, MIC (μg/mL) and modulating factors (in bracket) | Modulating effect (%)b | | E. coli | E. aerogenes | K. pneumoniae | P. stuartuii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CIP | MIC/2 | ≤0.5 (na) | ≤0.5 (na) | 64(2) | 32 (2) | 128 (1) | 1 (1) | 64 (2) | 1 (1) | 32 (1) | 33.33 | | MIC/4 | ≤0.5 (na) | ≤0.5 (na) | 128(1) | 64 (1) | 128 (1) | 1 (1)8d262637ec2bd2cf4019abcbcb92951ebf038969a6655cc8d7cabf530861342b.png
| Period | No. of regions | STR-realigner | ReviSTER | IndelRealigner | --realign option | Original BAM | | 1 | 5345 | 2.477 | 2.695 | 6.017 | 6.009 | 6.009 | | 2 | 1160 | | | Period | No. of regions | STR-realigner | ReviSTER | IndelRealigner | --realign option | Original BAM | | 1 | 5345 | 2.477 | 2.695 | 6.017 | 6.009 | 6.009 | | 2 | 1160 | 3.545 | 3.740 | <...
| Total | 9595 | 3.116 | 3.309 | 6.752 | 6.727 | 6.732 |
2314ae9f3cbe088777a86993d3c7863ec9dae7b4e78a27677351688d054de18a.png
| Variables | β | P value | OR (95% CI) | | Age | 0.428 | <0.001 | 1.53 (1.35–1.75) | | HR | 0.859 | <0.001 | 2.36 (2.09–2.67) | | BMI | 0.273 | 0.001 | 1.31 (...
| Variables | β | P value | OR (95% CI) | | Age | 0.428 | <0.001 | 1.53 (1.35–1.75) | | HR | 0.859 | <0.001 | 2.36 (2.09–2.67) | | BMI | 0.273 | 0.001 | 1.31 (1.13–1.53) | | WC | | DBP | 0.019 | 0.001 | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | | FPG | 0.450 | <0.001 | 1.57 (1.39–1.78) | | PBG | 0.475 | <0.001 | 1.61 (1.41–1.83) | | IR | 0.279 | <0.001 | 1.32 (1.20–1.46) | | TG | ...
c2f55c30d3aa8f10229f888d93310dd098f4d07dc90803f295703f636a2c0e04.png
| Year | | | | 1992 (n = 321) | 2000 (n = 433) | 2008 (n = 607) | Trend | | % | n | % | n | % | <...
| Year | | | | 1992 (n = 321) | 2000 (n = 433) | 2008 (n = 607) | Trend | | % | n | % | n | % | n | χ2 (d.f. = 1) | P |
|
| Year | | | | Bad news | 76 | 94 | 73 | 74 | 48 | 91 | 26.653 | < 0.001 | | Understanding mental illness | 6 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 24 | 45 | 17.096 | < 0.0...
cb17a289922844333b0e6ca44260abc1cb959f2d067264fa51a35124da008bba.png
| Trait (nm) | Standard diet | Standard diet + ATRA | | SHR | SHR-Lx | SHR | SHR-Lx | | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 8) | | VLDL-TG | 49.51 ± 0....
| Trait (nm) | Standard diet | Standard diet + ATRA |
| Trait (nm) | SHR | SHR-Lx | SHR | SHR-Lx | | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 8) | | VLDL-TG | 49.51 ± 0.45 | 48.24 ± 0.49 | 48.48 ± 0.68 | 50.27 ± 0.41\*,a | | LDL-C | 21.45 ± 0.25 |
|
|
|
| 8de1285b04d9bbcdbe6075904c78dbbf8d7e09f8685023507e48bd9e45cc227a.png
| Method of risk assessment | Definition | Advantages | Limitations | | Clinical prediction rules | The use of a scoring system based on patient- or procedure-related risk factors to quantify risk | Often cost-neutral | Estimates population risk for patient ...
| Method of risk assessment | Definition | Advantages | Limitations | | Clinical prediction rules | The use of a scoring system based on patient- or procedure-related risk factors to quantify risk | Often cost-neutral | Estimates population risk for patient ...
| Method of risk assessment | Definition | Advantages | Limitations | | | | Poor sensitivity and specificity for prediction of morbidity and mortality on an individual patient basis\[33,40\] | | Lee Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) | S...
7dbae20bf417d120566efbf5e1069658b3102a91265d7544a4148bd8ea269ba7.png
| Polymorphism | Reference allele homozygote | Heterozygote | Variant allele homozygote | | PAI-2 (SERPINB, rs6095) | | | | | Event Rate (%) | 34.7 | 14.6 | 6.7 | | Number of patients | 72 | 4...
| Polymorphism | Reference allele homozygote | Heterozygote | Variant allele homozygote | | PAI-2 (SERPINB, rs6095) | | | | | Event Rate (%) | 34.7 | 14.6 | 6.7 | | Number of patients | 72 | 48 | <...
| Number of patients (%) | 67.9 | 29.3 | 2.9 | | CETP (CETP, rs708272)\* | | | | | Event Rate (%) | 14.9 | 26.4 | 33.3 | | Number of patients | 47 | 72 | 24 | | Number of patients (...
c790e2463e5e7b3dfcb06fd98a5c88fd693e3ca1e91ce2133f2d1e9ba2d18483.png
| Group | Location | Gender | Age range (years) | Number of participants | | One | ROI | Female | 20-29 | 8 | | Two | ROI | Female | 30-40 | 9 | | Three | ROI | Male | 29-39 | ...
| Group | Location | Gender | Age range (years) | Number of participants | | One | ROI | Female | 20-29 | 8 |
| Group | Location | Gender | Age range (years) | Number of participants | | Two | ROI | Female | 30-40 | 9 | | Three | ROI | Male | 29-39 | 8 | | Four | NI | Male | 29-59 | 9719396d944e667711b48e627cccebac09e62229ec8e1450c5732639d36c45bf.png
| Gene/Gene Cluster Name | Localization within the POC9 Draft Genome Sequence(GenBank acc. no.) | Protein | Best BLAST Hits:\[% Identity\] Organism(GeneBank acc. no.) | Predicted Antimicrobial Resistance Profile | Tested Antibiotics | Profile | <...
| Gene/Gene Cluster Name | Localization within the POC9 Draft Genome Sequence(GenBank acc. no.) | Protein | Best BLAST Hits:\[% Identity\] Organism(GeneBank acc. no.) | Predicted Antimicrobial Resistance Profile | Tested Antibiotics | Profile | g...
| tetG-tetR | contig00014 (QGST01000014.1)coordinates: 7148–9063 | Tet(A/B/C) family MFS transporter | \[87%\] Ochrobactrum oryzae(WP\_104755825) | tetracyclines | TE | S | | transcriptional regulator ...
6aa169f9d5fbada5f015c1d047606c96fbc7b18a28eeeefc48feb4f09b4b2aa7.png
| Fixed effects model | Growth curve model 1 | Growth curve model 2 | | Fixed part | | | | | Intercept | 0.820 (0.756 to 0.884) | 0.823 (0.779 to 0.866) | 0.830 (0.791 to 0.87) | Age-centred (li...
| Fixed effects model | Growth curve model 1 | Growth curve model 2 | | Fixed part | | | | | Intercept | 0.820 (0.756 to 0.884) | 0.823 (0.779 to 0.866) | 0.830 (0.791 to 0.87) | | Age-centred (linear term) | | Fixed effects model | Growth curve model 1 | Growth curve model 2 | | Level 1 (wave) | | | | | Intercept | | 0.020 | 0.020 | | N observations (level 1) | 27 509 | 27 509 | 27 509 | ccaa30b2b79fc120081d5d0f41702613b88cac6b56335baac2ee9126bd902fbb.png
| Characteristic | N | % | | Age | | | | < = 50 | 22 | 13.3 | | 51-60 | 42 | 25.3 | | 61-70 | 57 | 34.3 | | > 70 | 45 | 27.1 | | Tumor (T) | ...
| Characteristic | | Age | | < = 50 | | 51-60 | | 61-70 | | > 70 | | Tumor (T) | | T1 | | T2 | | T3 | | T4 | | Lymph nodes (N) | | N0 | ...
| N | % | | | | 22 | 13.3 | | 42 | 25.3 | | 57 | 34.3 | | 45 | 27.1 | | | | 68 | 41 | | 40 | 24.1 | | 34 | 20.5 | <...
79e181aa93eba88ac222ea123cb792b90ecdc7862e5cfb598ead0256edc4904b.png
| Month 1 | Month 16 | Month 21 | Total samplen = 72 | | Decisions to be made, n (%) | | | | | | Medical admission or treatment | 17 (81)a | 12 (44)a | 8 (33)a | | Month 1 | Month 16 | Month 21 | Total samplen = 72 | | Decisions to be made, n (%) | | | | | | Medical admission or treatment | 17 (81)a | 12 (44)a | 8 (33)a | 37 (51) | Psychiatric adm...
| Month 1 | Month 16 | Month 21 | Total samplen = 72 | | Agreement status, n (%) | | | | | | Agreeing | 5 (24) | 15 (56) | 12 (50) | 32 (44) | | Not agreeing(or unable to express a choice/n...
81ee06e3d49c6d5e79b5b0194793bb6f3dff718b95f0d6bd127275843a7cac92.png
| Food composition of major foods in Uganda (per 100 g of edible portion) | | Food | Calories | Protein (g) | Iron (Mg) | | Finger millet | 346 | 8.7 | 4.0 | | Sorghum | 354 | 10.2 | | Food composition of major foods in Uganda (per 100 g of edible portion) | | Food | Calories | Protein (g) | Iron (Mg) | | Finger millet | 346 | 8.7 | 4.0 | | Sorghum | 354 | 10.2 | | Simsim | 593 | 20.1 | 9.8 | | Sweet Potato | 166 | 1.3 | 1.2 | | Per capita of protein and calories derived from the major foods | | Food | Protein | Calories...
e671671fe066e5733268260f13cb36a8277c039eaccccd5b61f626a78359a3a7.png
| Cluster # | Expression level | | High | Medium high | Medium | Medium low | Low | | 1 | Ribosome | Lumen | Lumen | Lumen | DNA repair/Stress response | | 2 | Oxidative Phosphor...
| Cluster # | Expression level | | High | Medium high | Medium | Medium low | Low | | 1 | Ribosome | Lumen | Lumen | Lumen | DNA repair/Stress response | | 2 | Oxidative Phosphor...
| al subunits | components | Ankyrin repeats | ion | of differentiation | | 10 | Protein folding | RNA splicing | tRNA | Zinc finger CH2 | Nucleic acid binding |
1760b2a9a980613cd0d31f0518c69959cd5abeae1a41b7c004ec897f66ae1127.png
| Primary reference, Study, Country (secondary references) | Objectives | Design | Sample size | Patient population | Follow-up | | Treatment-related observational studies | Driessen 2008\[68\], Radboud University Registry, The Netherlands...
| Primary reference, Study, Country (secondary references) | Objectives | Design | Sample size | Patient population | Follow-up | | Treatment-related observational studies | Driessen 2008\[68\], Radboud University Registry, The Netherlands...
| Primary reference, Study, Country (secondary references) | Objectives | Design | Sample size | Patient population | Follow-up | | Kane 2003\[95\], St. Vincent's University study, Ireland, (Kane 2003a\[96\]) | Clinical presentation, outcome and prognosis of ear...
e9b63f146dc955559d16fe04f4b008cc06ff86cee61a0a6a21294f06ccd8332c.png
| Characteristics | No OSA | Mild-Moderate OSA | Severe OSA | p value | | n = 10 | n = 33 | n = 34 | | Total sleep time (minutes) | 288.2 ± 88.2 | 268.3 ± 80.7 | 253...
| Characteristics | No OSA | Mild-Moderate OSA | Severe OSA | p value | | n = 10 | n = 33 | n = 34 | | Total sleep time (minutes) | 288.2 ± 88.2 | 268.3 ± 80.7 | 253.8 ± 74.6 | 0.207 | | Sleep efficiency (%) | 76.1 ± 22.9 | 75.8 ± 16.1 | 72.1 ± 18.0 | 0.506 | | AHI event. h−1 | 2.4 ± 1.5 | 16.2 ± 6.6 | 61.4 ± 20.0 | 0.001 | | ODI event. h−1 | 1.7 ± 1.7 | 14.5 ± 6.1 | 52.1 ± 22.8 | 0.001 | ...
ecaa3f8b2afd8c6029196955bef614115131d03d423e995bc8434738abd43359.png
| Animal group | Body weight (g) | Blood glucose (mg/dL) | | Before STZ injection | End experiment | Before drug injection | End experiment | | Control (8) | 270 ± 13.9 | 276.25 ± 13.29 | | Animal group | Body weight (g) | Blood glucose (mg/dL) |
| Animal group | Before STZ injection | End experiment | Before drug injection | End experiment | | Control (8) | 270 ± 13.9 | 276.25 ± 13.29 | 133 ± 33.41 | 132.87 ± 35.62 | | Vehicle (8) | 260 ± 21.60 | 237.14 ± 24.97\*<...
0f11f0c50f89213400914c7a505147442058b668589b9430ede7aef5c13d8c07.png
| Symbol | Name | Function | Reference | | PLK1 | polo-like kinase 1 | cell cycle regulation | \[13-19\] | | CDK16 | cyclin-dependent kinase 16 | cell cycle regulation | \[20\] | | RYK | receptor-like tyrosine ki...
| Symbol | Name | Function | Reference | | PLK1 | polo-like kinase 1 | cell cycle regulation | \[13-19\] | | CDK16 | cyclin-dependent kinase 16 | cell cycle regulation | \[20\] | | RYK | receptor-like tyrosine ki...
| Symbol | Name | Function | Reference | | AURKA | aurora kinase A | cell cycle regulation | \[33,34\] | | BUB1 | mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase | cell cycle regulation | \[35\] | | CDC7 | cell divisi...
8a938dcf98995c1cad36b196933af6ea2d61f6576d11c00cb0996bf830a2545c.png
| | | Dietary supplementationa | Statistical significance of variance ratio (P)b, effects of | | | Control | TTA | FO | TTA + FO | TTA | FO | TTA\*FO | | CPT-I | 2....
| | Dietary supplementationa | Statistical significance of variance ratio (P)b, effects of | | Control | TTA | FO | TTA + FO | TTA | FO | TTA\*FO | | CPT-I | 2.79 ± 0.26c | 1.69 ±...
| CPT-I (with malonyl-CoA) | 1.89 ± 0.21 | 1.23 ± 0.28 | 1.77 ± 0.14 | 1.31 ± 0.13 | <0.001 | 0.73 | 0.14 | | CPT-II | 10.79 ± 1.03 | 23.55 ± 3.15 | 12.40 ± 2.33 | 22.39 ± 4.32 | <0.001 | 0.82 | 0.15 | <...
85dbd38e4c22fe34329f26898b167873c62a81dece6b75b27f9de01171c94c2d.png
| | D-dimer ≥10 μg/mL after treatment | | | | No | Yes | p∗ | | | (n = 31) | (n = 21) | | | Male sex | 18 (58.1%) | 10 (47.6%) | | D-dimer ≥10 μg/mL after treatment | | | No | Yes | p∗ | | (n = 31) | (n = 21) | | | Male sex | 18 (58.1%) | 10 (47.6%) | 0.458 | | Age, years | 63 (55–71) | | D-dimer ≥10 μg/mL after treatment | | | No | Yes | p∗ | | (n = 31) | (n = 21) | | | Warfarin | 10 (32.3%) | 16 (72.6%) | | | Cancer profiles | | | ...
2e223de9d2a4188ea3d600f4da5d81bb8f015ad92f14d270ecae7d7ae159a10a.png
| Generic name | Study drug name (Brand name) | Active ingredient content | Manufacturers/distributors | | amlodipine besilate | Amlodin® tablets 2.5 | containing 2.5 mg of amlodipine | Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. | | | Generic name | Study drug name (Brand name) | Active ingredient content | Manufacturers/distributors | | amlodipine besilate | Amlodin® tablets 2.5 | containing 2.5 mg of amlodipine | Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. |
| Amlodin® tablets 5 | containing 5 mg of amlodipine | | | Norvasc® tablets 2.5 mg | containing 2.5 mg of amlodipine | Pfizer Japan Inc. | | Norvasc® tablets 5 mg | containing 5 mg of amlodipine | |
0a9d75ddd91445ba6a219610e77e40ee6bf6ebcc81a85cc7e82d45983f98cc04.png
| BPG | Patient Eligibility Criteria | Participating Program Units | | Asthma | Patients who present to the participating units with a primary or secondary diagnosis of asthma | Emergency, in-patient and medical units | | Breastfeeding | Postpartum w...
| BPG | Patient Eligibility Criteria | Participating Program Units | | Asthma | Patients who present to the participating units with a primary or secondary diagnosis of asthma | Emergency, in-patient and medical units |
| BPG | Patient Eligibility Criteria | Participating Program Units | | Breastfeeding | Postpartum women and their infants with a singleton birth, gestational age of 37 or more weeks, hospital length of stay for mother and infant 24 hours or more after birth, infant not delive...
912b9b91fdaca3c74a75ca6d1cb893ea7d8a60f1059bd1b71d4691632ce9fa0d.png
| Organism | Precision | Recall | F-score | | Mouse | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.79 | | Yeast | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.90 | | Fly | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.82 | FlyAccept matches of synonyms associated to up...
| Organism | Precision | Recall | F-score |
| Mouse | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.79 | | Yeast | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.90 | | Fly | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.82 | | FlyAccept matches of synonyms associated to up to 3 different Entrez Gene entries | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.79<...
e65e582dc802d0364c209deb4409969b2d88f0a20ace377494eb5d13d4fcd674.png
| Command | Value | Description | | ACK | 0×06 | It is sent when a frame has been received and decoded correctly. | | NACK | 0×15 | It is sent when a frame has not been decoded correctly. | | RESET | 0×08 | | Command | Value | Description | | ACK | 0×06 | It is sent when a frame has been received and decoded correctly. |
| NACK | 0×15 | It is sent when a frame has not been decoded correctly. | | RESET | 0×08 | It forces the node to be reset. After this command, the node sends an ACK and resets itself. For the next 2 seconds the node enters a programing mode which allows the central comp...
f004dd934af35ecfb12802de9b2f588aa0c04d668fb47d61fd9ad800a4cba792.png
| N | % | % susceptible TMP/SMX | Ciprofloxacin | Nitrofurantoin | | E. coli | 73 | 82 | 93 | 100 | 95 | | P. mirabillis | 5 | 5.6 | 100 | 100 | na | K. pne...
| N | % | % susceptible TMP/SMX | Ciprofloxacin | Nitrofurantoin | | E. coli | 73 | 82 | 93 | 100 | 95 | | P. mirabillis | 5 | 5.6 | 100 | 100 | na | | K. pneumonia | 4<...
228a830e40b5d378aff210113a9bb0879ffd29faf1451bf619922c3ee1867680.png
| Dimension | Categories | | Primary diagnosis | Organic mental health problem (most commonly dementia) | | Depression or anxiety | | Other mental health problem e.g., schizophrenia | | Main reason for admission | | Dimension | Categories | | Primary diagnosis | Organic mental health problem (most commonly dementia) | | Depression or anxiety | | Other mental health problem e.g., schizophrenia | | Main reason for admission | | Main reason for admission | Behaviour management related i.e., need for behaviour management, risk of harming others or care breakdown | | Need for diagnostic assessment, medication review or treatment | | Challenging behaviour | Low (behaviou... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|