Open Source Software, Closed Source Software or Both: Impact (original) (raw)

Author

Listed:

Abstract

There is considerable debate regarding the use of intellectual property rights (IPR) to spur innovation in the software industry. In this paper we focus on the choice of intellectual property right regimes and industry growth. We begin by developing a growth optimal mixture of open source and closed source software. This optimal scenario is then used as a basis to examine the co-existence of open and closed source software within various institutional frameworks ranging from no protection, copyright to patent protection. Such an analysis is beneficial as it enables an objective comparison of the three scenarios under the assumption that both copyrights and patents serve the purpose for which they were designed. Our analysis, based on the existence or absence of spillovers, confirms that a co-existence is growth optimal for the industry. Further, we find that the move from no protection to copyright protection increases the maximum growth rate. However, despite assuming properly functioning patents, the benefits of moving from copyright to patent protection are less clear.

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher

References listed on IDEAS

  1. Michael Noel & Mark Schankerman, 2013. "Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation,"Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 481-520, September.
  2. Quah, Danny, 2003. "Digital Goods and the New Economy,"CEPR Discussion Papers3846, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  3. James Bessen & Robert M. Hunt, 2007. "An Empirical Look at Software Patents,"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 157-189, March.
  4. Claude Crampes & Corinne Langinier, 2009. "Are Intellectual Property Rights Detrimental to Innovation?,"International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 249-268.
  5. Petra Moser, 2005. "How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs,"American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1214-1236, September.
  6. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value,"American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
  7. James Bessen, 2004. "Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies,"Working Papers0401, Research on Innovation.
  8. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,"NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Arundel, Anthony, 2001. "The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation,"Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 611-624, April.
  10. James Bessen & Eric Maskin, 2009. "Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation,"RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(4), pages 611-635, December.
  1. Wesley M. Cohen & Richard R. Nelson & John P. Walsh, 2000. "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not),"NBER Working Papers7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  1. Nancy Gallini & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2002. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?,"NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 2, pages 51-78, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  1. Levin, Richard C, 1988. "Appropriability, R&D Spending, and Technological Performance,"American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(2), pages 424-428, May.
  2. Justin Pappas Johnson, 2002. "Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good,"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 637-662, December.
  3. James Bessen & Robert M. Hunt, 2004. "The software patent experiment,"Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q3, pages 22-32.
  4. Quah, Danny, 2003. "Digital goods and the new economy,"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics2236, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  5. Frederick R. Warren-Boulton & Kenneth C. Baseman & Glenn A. Woroch, 1994. "The Economics of Intellectual Property Protection for Software: The Proper Role for Copyright,"Industrial Organization9411004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  6. James Bessen, 2006. "A Comment on “Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry?”,"Working Papers0601, Research on Innovation.
  7. Jeffrey Church & Ian King, 1993. "Bilingualism and Network Externalities,"Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 337-345, May.
  8. James J. Anton & Dennis A. Yao, 2004. "Little Patents and Big Secrets: Managing Intellectual Property,"RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, Spring.
  9. Suzanne Scotchmer, 1991. "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law,"Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 29-41, Winter.

Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

Cited by:

  1. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source,"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
  2. Alexia Gaudeul, 2008. "Consumer Welfare and Market Structure in a Model of Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software,"Working Papers08-31, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia.

These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

  1. Rockett, Katharine, 2010. "Property Rights and Invention,"Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 315-380, Elsevier.
  2. Encaoua, David & Guellec, Dominique & Martinez, Catalina, 2006. "Patent systems for encouraging innovation: Lessons from economic analysis,"Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1423-1440, November.
  3. Cohen, Wesley M., 2010. "Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance,"Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 129-213, Elsevier.
  4. Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2019. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence from Trade Secrets Laws,"CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Seriescrctr224_2019_119v1, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  5. Schwiebacher, Franz, 2013. "Does fragmented or heterogeneous IP ownership stifle investments in innovation?,"ZEW Discussion Papers13-096, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  6. Rentocchini, Francesco, 2011. "Sources and characteristics of software patents in the European Union: Some empirical considerations,"Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 141-157, March.
  7. Nancy Gallini, 2017. "Do patents work? Thickets, trolls and antibiotic resistance,"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 893-926, November.
  8. Penin, Julien, 2005. "Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look,"Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 641-656, June.
  9. Anja, Breitwieser & Neil, Foster, 2012. "Intellectual property rights, innovation and technology transfer: a survey,"MPRA Paper36094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  10. Antonelli Cristiano, 2012. "Compulsory licensing: the foundations of an institutional innovation,"Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio201207, University of Turin.
  11. Giovanni Dosi & Luigi Marengo & Corrado Pasquali, 2010. "How Much Should Society Fuel the Greed of Innovators? On the Relations between Appropriability, Opportunities and Rates of Innovation,"Chapters, in: Riccardo Viale & Henry Etzkowitz (ed.), The Capitalization of Knowledge, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  1. Griffith, Rachel & Lee, Sokbae & Straathof, Bas, 2017. "Recombinant innovation and the boundaries of the firm,"International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 34-56.
  1. Alexandre Almeida & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2007. "Does Patenting negatively impact on R&D investment?An international panel data assessment,"FEP Working Papers255, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
  2. Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto, 2008. "Intellectual property rights and efficient firm organization,"Economics Working Papers1254, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised May 2014.
  1. Malte Mosel, 2012. "The role of patents and secrecy for intellectual property protection: theory and evidence,"Working Papers117, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
  2. Miric, Milan & Boudreau, Kevin J. & Jeppesen, Lars Bo, 2019. "Protecting their digital assets: The use of formal & informal appropriability strategies by App developers,"Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
  3. Silvana Krasteva, 2014. "Imperfect Patent Protection and Innovation,"Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 682-708, December.
  4. Yann Ménière & Sarah Parlane, 2004. "A Dynamic Model of Cross Licensing,"Working Papers200424, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  5. Stefano Comino & Fabio M. Manenti & NIkolaus Thumm, 2017. "The Role of Patents in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). A survey of the Literature,""Marco Fanno" Working Papers0212, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
  6. Arora, Ashish & Ceccagnoli, Marco & Cohen, Wesley M., 2008. "R&D and the patent premium,"International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 1153-1179, September.

More about this item

Keywords

Intellectual Property rights; software; open source; spillovers; co-existence; innovative growth;
[All these keywords](/cgi-bin/htsearch2?q=%22Intellectual+Property+rights%22 %22software%22 %22open+source%22 %22spillovers%22 %22co-existence%22 %22innovative+growth%22 ).

JEL classification:

NEP fields

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Lists

This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:

  1. Portal:Freie Software/Literatur in Wikipedia German

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.