Andrea Brassard - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Andrea Brassard
Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2011
OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importanc... more OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration. J
Purpose: The goal of this project was to gauge public response to the 15 nursing sensitive qualit... more Purpose: The goal of this project was to gauge public response to the 15 nursing sensitive quality measures endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF-15). This project asked consumers and patients if the NQF-15 measures were understandable, important, and if nurses vary in their performance. Background/Significance: Public reporting of quality measures is on the rise, e.g. "Hospital Compare." Yet many public reports are not looked at, not understood, and not used by the intended audience - consumers and pateints. If public reports on hospital quality do not include measures that the public finds important, they are unlikely to pay attention to such reports. To date, the process by which measures have been chosen for reporting has been driven almost exclusively by health professionals. Methods: Nine focus groups in three locations were conducted with recently hospitalized patients who received obstetric, medical, or surgical services. Participants were asked if they could...
Public Health Nursing, 1996
The purpose of this study was to examine the health patterns of cardiac surgical patients in the ... more The purpose of this study was to examine the health patterns of cardiac surgical patients in the home health care population and their relationships to outcomes and duration of home health care using Gordon's Functional Health Pattern framework. Home health care records of 96 cardiac surgical clients were reviewed. Admission health pattern data, reasons for admission, duration and outcomes of home care services, characteristics of hospital experience, and demographic data were analyzed. Dysfunctional health patterns were primarily in the area of activity/exercise. The most common reasons for admission were monitoring of cardiopulmonary status, wound care, and instruction on diet, medications, and cardiac regimen. The mean duration of home care was 28.8 days. Thirty percent of the sample were readmitted to the hospital. Duration of home care was shorter for those who were married and for those who reported weakness, tiredness, or fatigue as a chief complaint. Readmission to the hospital was more likely for those who had complications during their initial hospital stay and those who required at least partial assistance with bathing, dressing, feeding, or toileting. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importanc... more OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration. J
Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 2006
Nurses, certified nursing assistants, activity personnel, social workers, and physicians in 5 cit... more Nurses, certified nursing assistants, activity personnel, social workers, and physicians in 5 cities rated their ability to affect each of 17 quality of life (QoL) items for 2 hypothetical cases. Those closest to the residents feel the most empowered to make a difference. Overall, certified nursing assistants were consistently the most optimistic about their ability to influence QoL. Perceptions of ability to influence QoL were correlated with attitudes about nursing homes. These perceptions may be helpful in retaining such staff.
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2005
Quality-of-life (QoL) is now recognized as a principal outcome marker for long-term care. However... more Quality-of-life (QoL) is now recognized as a principal outcome marker for long-term care. However, QoL is difficult to define and measure, especially in residents with dementia. Providers of longterm care services (n = 182) were asked to rate the importance of 19 psychosocial quality-of-life elements for hypothetical residents with physical impairment and for residents with cognitive impairment. Respondents also were asked to rate their ability to influence these elements for each type of resident. Respondents rated the importance of 18 of the 19 elements and their ability to influence 17 of 19 elements lower for residents with cognitive impairment. Of the five types of respondents, certified nursing assistants (CNAs) rated their ability to influence these QoL elements the highest for both types of residents; physicians' ratings were the lowest. Pain management was given high ratings for both importance and ability to influence for both resident types; the lowest ratings were given for elements that pertained to residents' understanding. A strong correlation between ratings for importance and ability to influence was observed. Additional research is needed on the psychosocial aspects of long-term care residents' QoL, especially those with cognitive impairment.
Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 2009
This book is aptly titled because, indeed, it is a handbook for the professional or layperson who... more This book is aptly titled because, indeed, it is a handbook for the professional or layperson who is interested in planning and conducting a structured life review with another person. In fact, the specific audience for The Handbook of Structured Life Review is the person ...
Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2011
OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importanc... more OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration. J
Purpose: The goal of this project was to gauge public response to the 15 nursing sensitive qualit... more Purpose: The goal of this project was to gauge public response to the 15 nursing sensitive quality measures endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF-15). This project asked consumers and patients if the NQF-15 measures were understandable, important, and if nurses vary in their performance. Background/Significance: Public reporting of quality measures is on the rise, e.g. "Hospital Compare." Yet many public reports are not looked at, not understood, and not used by the intended audience - consumers and pateints. If public reports on hospital quality do not include measures that the public finds important, they are unlikely to pay attention to such reports. To date, the process by which measures have been chosen for reporting has been driven almost exclusively by health professionals. Methods: Nine focus groups in three locations were conducted with recently hospitalized patients who received obstetric, medical, or surgical services. Participants were asked if they could...
Public Health Nursing, 1996
The purpose of this study was to examine the health patterns of cardiac surgical patients in the ... more The purpose of this study was to examine the health patterns of cardiac surgical patients in the home health care population and their relationships to outcomes and duration of home health care using Gordon's Functional Health Pattern framework. Home health care records of 96 cardiac surgical clients were reviewed. Admission health pattern data, reasons for admission, duration and outcomes of home care services, characteristics of hospital experience, and demographic data were analyzed. Dysfunctional health patterns were primarily in the area of activity/exercise. The most common reasons for admission were monitoring of cardiopulmonary status, wound care, and instruction on diet, medications, and cardiac regimen. The mean duration of home care was 28.8 days. Thirty percent of the sample were readmitted to the hospital. Duration of home care was shorter for those who were married and for those who reported weakness, tiredness, or fatigue as a chief complaint. Readmission to the hospital was more likely for those who had complications during their initial hospital stay and those who required at least partial assistance with bathing, dressing, feeding, or toileting. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importanc... more OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration. J
Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 2006
Nurses, certified nursing assistants, activity personnel, social workers, and physicians in 5 cit... more Nurses, certified nursing assistants, activity personnel, social workers, and physicians in 5 cities rated their ability to affect each of 17 quality of life (QoL) items for 2 hypothetical cases. Those closest to the residents feel the most empowered to make a difference. Overall, certified nursing assistants were consistently the most optimistic about their ability to influence QoL. Perceptions of ability to influence QoL were correlated with attitudes about nursing homes. These perceptions may be helpful in retaining such staff.
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2005
Quality-of-life (QoL) is now recognized as a principal outcome marker for long-term care. However... more Quality-of-life (QoL) is now recognized as a principal outcome marker for long-term care. However, QoL is difficult to define and measure, especially in residents with dementia. Providers of longterm care services (n = 182) were asked to rate the importance of 19 psychosocial quality-of-life elements for hypothetical residents with physical impairment and for residents with cognitive impairment. Respondents also were asked to rate their ability to influence these elements for each type of resident. Respondents rated the importance of 18 of the 19 elements and their ability to influence 17 of 19 elements lower for residents with cognitive impairment. Of the five types of respondents, certified nursing assistants (CNAs) rated their ability to influence these QoL elements the highest for both types of residents; physicians' ratings were the lowest. Pain management was given high ratings for both importance and ability to influence for both resident types; the lowest ratings were given for elements that pertained to residents' understanding. A strong correlation between ratings for importance and ability to influence was observed. Additional research is needed on the psychosocial aspects of long-term care residents' QoL, especially those with cognitive impairment.
Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 2009
This book is aptly titled because, indeed, it is a handbook for the professional or layperson who... more This book is aptly titled because, indeed, it is a handbook for the professional or layperson who is interested in planning and conducting a structured life review with another person. In fact, the specific audience for The Handbook of Structured Life Review is the person ...