Andualem Lema - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Andualem Lema

The period of ten year stipulated in Article 1845 of the Civil Code is widely accepted as a Gener... more The period of ten year stipulated in Article 1845 of the Civil Code is widely accepted as a General Period of Limitation (GPoL) and is often applied to all civil claims irrespective of the origin and nature of obligations unless a special period of limitation has been fixed by law. However, due to the absence of a clear rule regarding the dimension and scope of its application, the general applicability of Article 1845 has been contested on different occasions. Thus, this article examines the issue of whether the period of ten year is appropriate for all civil claims or not while assessing the instances where such GPoL could be disregarded by the discretion of the court under the guidance of certain considerations. Accordingly, it canvasses the issue of whether the court should always apply the ten year GPoL by the mere fact that the law provides neither a special period of limitation nor exclusionary rule, or ought there be a little room where the court may apply some other period of limitation to other similar claims by analogy; or exempt certain claims from the subject of limitation before the move to apply Article 1845 of the Civil Code, which is explicitly stipulated for contractual claims. This article concludes that even though the argument advocating for the general application of the ten-year period in the absence of special periods of limitation is a widely shared view, the door should not be totally closed for judicial discretion whereby the period maybe disregarded on the basis of different considerations. However, since the reliance on judicial discretion to override a limitation period would render the law too uncertain, the author maintains that Ethiopia should adopt a separate and relatively comprehensive statute of limitation that clearly provides, inter alia, the dimension and scope of application of the ten year GPoL and lists of claims exempted from the subject of limitation to avoid the misuse of Article 1845 of the Civil Code.

Haramaya Law Review, Feb 3, 2015

The 1997 Watercourses Convention is the first and the only worldwide instrument enacted under the... more The 1997 Watercourses Convention is the first and the only worldwide instrument enacted under the auspice of the United Nations as far as the non-navigational uses of international watercourses is concerned. Although the Convention has entered in to force in 2014 after seventeen years of its adoption, many watercourse states are still hesitant to join the Convention. Given the divergent views of the respective countries towards the provisions of the Convention coupled with the existing tension and lack of genuine trust among downstream vis-à-vis upstream blocks, none of the Nile riparian states are currently parties to the Convention. The article is thus aimed to examine whether joining to or staying out from the Convention provides a betteroff position for Ethiopia particularly in its relation with the two downstream Countries-Egypt and Sudan. Owing to the confusing and downstream favored provisions of the Convention coupled with the Egyptians' long lasting adherence to historic right based argument, the article asserted that the move to join the Convention might be expensive for Ethiopia which may force it to pay unnecessary bills for the advantages of the two downstream countries. Therefore, I argue that it is better for Ethiopia to stay out from the Convention and the complexities thereto while expecting at least 'a half and a loaf' from the application of the customary international water law regime, if there is any.

Haramaya Law Review, Feb 3, 2015