Antje Linkenbach - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
2020 - Religious Individualisation: by Antje Linkenbach
Ed. vols by Antje Linkenbach
Religious Individualisation: Historical Dimensions and Comparative Perspectives, 2020
This volume brings together key findings of the long-term research project ‘Religious Individuali... more This volume brings together key findings of the long-term research project ‘Religious Individualisation in Historical Perspective’ (Max Weber Centre for
Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, Erfurt University). Combining a wide range of disciplinary approaches, methods and theories, the volume assembles over 50 contributions that explore and compare processes of religious individualisation in different religious environments and historical periods, in particular in Asia, the Mediterranean, and Europe from antiquity to the recent past.
Contrary to standard theories of modernisation, which tend to regard religious individualisation as a specifically modern or early modern as well as an essentially Western or Christian phenomenon, the chapters reveal processes of religious individualisation in a large variety of non-Western and pre-modern scenarios. Furthermore, the volume challenges prevalent views that regard religions primarily as collective phenomena and provides nuanced perspectives on the appropriation of religious agency, the pluralisation of religious options, dynamics of de-traditionalisation and privatisation, the development of elaborated notions of the self, the facilitation of religious deviance, and on the notion of dividuality.
Papers by Antje Linkenbach
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks, Dec 31, 2022
BRILL eBooks, Apr 11, 2023
Religious Individualisation, 2019
Current Anthropology, 1988
Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation), 2020
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Focusing on the work of Johann P. Arnason and Peter Wagner, this article examines in its first pa... more Focusing on the work of Johann P. Arnason and Peter Wagner, this article examines in its first part recent sociological, non-linear and contingency-sensitive ways of engagement with modernity, which refer to different levels of socio-historical configuration (civilization analysis vs. world sociology) and attribute different significance to normative questions. While both authors acknowledge the entanglement of European and non-European cultural worlds as well as its power dynamics, they still fail to fully grasp and theorize the devastating role of colonialism, which today is still felt in the marginalisation and even erasure of knowledge, perspectives, ideas and experiences from the ‘non-West’. Their approaches also lack a serious engagement with post- and decolonial scholarship. The second part of this contribution presents decolonial thinking as a theoretical and normative-political project. Theorising modernity from ‘beyond’ invites us to ‘break the Western code’ (Mignolo) and ...
A Place in the World, 2002
... It is said that around AD 800 the sacred shrines of Kedarnath and Badrinath were established ... more ... It is said that around AD 800 the sacred shrines of Kedarnath and Badrinath were established by the famous Hindu saint Shankaracharya. These, together with the sources of the holy rivers of Yamuna and Bhagirathi became Krthas (pilgrimage sites) of'eminent sanctity'. ...
SAGE Publications eBooks, Sep 9, 2022
Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften, 2022
Die Rezeption der Geschichtenphilosophie Wilhelm Schapps
Handbuch Entwicklungsforschung, 2016
Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen unterscheiden sich von Umweltbewegungen darin, dass sie die Sorge ... more Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen unterscheiden sich von Umweltbewegungen darin, dass sie die Sorge fur die Umwelt mit Forderungen nach sozialer Gerechtigkeit verbinden. Sie vertreten einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit der Natur und wollen in der sozialen Sphare Korrekturen durchzusetzen. Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen verstehen Natur als Lebensraum menschlicher Gemeinschaften – Menschen leben in der Natur. Umweltbewegungen dagegen tendieren dazu, Natur hauptsachlich als (externe) Um-Welt des Menschen zu sehen, die es zu schutzen gilt – auch und gerade vor den Menschen.
Das Jahr 2019 wurde von der UNO zum "Internationalen Jahr der indigenen Sprachen" ausge... more Das Jahr 2019 wurde von der UNO zum "Internationalen Jahr der indigenen Sprachen" ausgerufen. In diesem Zusammenhang ist der nachfolgende Text entstanden.
Religious Individualisation, Dec 16, 2019
Religious Individualisation, Dec 16, 2019
Religious Individualisation: Historical Dimensions and Comparative Perspectives, 2020
This volume brings together key findings of the long-term research project ‘Religious Individuali... more This volume brings together key findings of the long-term research project ‘Religious Individualisation in Historical Perspective’ (Max Weber Centre for
Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, Erfurt University). Combining a wide range of disciplinary approaches, methods and theories, the volume assembles over 50 contributions that explore and compare processes of religious individualisation in different religious environments and historical periods, in particular in Asia, the Mediterranean, and Europe from antiquity to the recent past.
Contrary to standard theories of modernisation, which tend to regard religious individualisation as a specifically modern or early modern as well as an essentially Western or Christian phenomenon, the chapters reveal processes of religious individualisation in a large variety of non-Western and pre-modern scenarios. Furthermore, the volume challenges prevalent views that regard religions primarily as collective phenomena and provides nuanced perspectives on the appropriation of religious agency, the pluralisation of religious options, dynamics of de-traditionalisation and privatisation, the development of elaborated notions of the self, the facilitation of religious deviance, and on the notion of dividuality.
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks, Dec 31, 2022
BRILL eBooks, Apr 11, 2023
Religious Individualisation, 2019
Current Anthropology, 1988
Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation), 2020
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Focusing on the work of Johann P. Arnason and Peter Wagner, this article examines in its first pa... more Focusing on the work of Johann P. Arnason and Peter Wagner, this article examines in its first part recent sociological, non-linear and contingency-sensitive ways of engagement with modernity, which refer to different levels of socio-historical configuration (civilization analysis vs. world sociology) and attribute different significance to normative questions. While both authors acknowledge the entanglement of European and non-European cultural worlds as well as its power dynamics, they still fail to fully grasp and theorize the devastating role of colonialism, which today is still felt in the marginalisation and even erasure of knowledge, perspectives, ideas and experiences from the ‘non-West’. Their approaches also lack a serious engagement with post- and decolonial scholarship. The second part of this contribution presents decolonial thinking as a theoretical and normative-political project. Theorising modernity from ‘beyond’ invites us to ‘break the Western code’ (Mignolo) and ...
A Place in the World, 2002
... It is said that around AD 800 the sacred shrines of Kedarnath and Badrinath were established ... more ... It is said that around AD 800 the sacred shrines of Kedarnath and Badrinath were established by the famous Hindu saint Shankaracharya. These, together with the sources of the holy rivers of Yamuna and Bhagirathi became Krthas (pilgrimage sites) of'eminent sanctity'. ...
SAGE Publications eBooks, Sep 9, 2022
Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften, 2022
Die Rezeption der Geschichtenphilosophie Wilhelm Schapps
Handbuch Entwicklungsforschung, 2016
Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen unterscheiden sich von Umweltbewegungen darin, dass sie die Sorge ... more Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen unterscheiden sich von Umweltbewegungen darin, dass sie die Sorge fur die Umwelt mit Forderungen nach sozialer Gerechtigkeit verbinden. Sie vertreten einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit der Natur und wollen in der sozialen Sphare Korrekturen durchzusetzen. Umweltgerechtigkeitsbewegungen verstehen Natur als Lebensraum menschlicher Gemeinschaften – Menschen leben in der Natur. Umweltbewegungen dagegen tendieren dazu, Natur hauptsachlich als (externe) Um-Welt des Menschen zu sehen, die es zu schutzen gilt – auch und gerade vor den Menschen.
Das Jahr 2019 wurde von der UNO zum "Internationalen Jahr der indigenen Sprachen" ausge... more Das Jahr 2019 wurde von der UNO zum "Internationalen Jahr der indigenen Sprachen" ausgerufen. In diesem Zusammenhang ist der nachfolgende Text entstanden.
Religious Individualisation, Dec 16, 2019
Religious Individualisation, Dec 16, 2019
Religious Individualisation, 2019