Antonio Casarico - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Antonio Casarico
Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Società italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica / Associazione ricerche in urologia, 2006
We retrospectively investigated the results of the 10-core scheme that our institute has adopted ... more We retrospectively investigated the results of the 10-core scheme that our institute has adopted for three years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cancer detection rate in different sets of biopsies (first, second, third and surgical specimen biopsy). Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer based on abnormal digital rectal examination, increase of PSA or hypoechoic lesion at transrectal ultrasound were subjected to a 10-core biopsy. Ten biopsies were taken following the traditional sextant technique and 4 more biopsies were obtained from the lateral peripheral zone. In addition, a group of 19 specimens of retropubic radical prostatectomy were biopsied immediately following surgery. Of 664 patients 247 (37.2%) were positive for prostate cancer at first biopsy. Eighty-one out of 664 patients were subjected to a second biopsy for persistent elevation or increasing of PSA, or in case of tumor associated histological findings such as high PIN and ASAP. The cancer dete...
Urology, 1991
We report a case of primary malignant melanoma of the male urethra, increasing the total number o... more We report a case of primary malignant melanoma of the male urethra, increasing the total number of reported cases to 31. The experience with our case suggests that urinary cytology is a diagnostic method for malignant melanoma and essential in the preoperative diagnosis of this disease.
Current Opinion in Urology, 2008
As male genital corrective surgery is becoming increasingly requested by patients, the need to re... more As male genital corrective surgery is becoming increasingly requested by patients, the need to reach a general consensus on indications and techniques is now imperative. This review of published data provides an overview concerning patient selection modalities, benefits/risks and expected outcomes of surgery. Finally, the article focuses on ethical issues caused by the growing aesthetic nature of this surgery. Interest has been sparked by animal studies, the description of innovative techniques for lengthening and girth enhancement techniques, reconstructive phalloplasty and penile implant surgery. Data suggest that better objective surgical outcomes are possible, though in many cases long-term data and patient-rated satisfaction details are lacking. Most importantly, studies show the importance of having a multidisciplinary team in charge of patient selection. Although more long-term data are required before a general consensus can be reached, recent findings point to the absolute need for a thorough psychological assessment of men requesting penile enhancement surgery. Urologists should work in very close collaboration with psychologists or psychosexologists both during the preoperative phase (to verify eligibility for surgery) and afterwards (to provide counselling).
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
Background: The first Italian national guidelines were developed by the Italian Association of Ur... more Background: The first Italian national guidelines were developed by the Italian Association of Urologists and published in 2007. Since then, a number of new drugs or classes of drugs have emerged for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), new data have emerged on medical therapy (monotherapies and combination therapies), new surgical techniques have come into practice, and our understanding of disease pathogenesis has increased. Consequently, a new update of the guidelines has become necessary. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted to identify relevant papers published between 1 August 2006 and 12 December 2010. Publications before or after this timeframe were considered only if they were recognised as important milestones in the field or if the literature search did not identify publications within this timeframe. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.
Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Società italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica / Associazione ricerche in urologia, 2006
We retrospectively investigated the results of the 10-core scheme that our institute has adopted ... more We retrospectively investigated the results of the 10-core scheme that our institute has adopted for three years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cancer detection rate in different sets of biopsies (first, second, third and surgical specimen biopsy). Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer based on abnormal digital rectal examination, increase of PSA or hypoechoic lesion at transrectal ultrasound were subjected to a 10-core biopsy. Ten biopsies were taken following the traditional sextant technique and 4 more biopsies were obtained from the lateral peripheral zone. In addition, a group of 19 specimens of retropubic radical prostatectomy were biopsied immediately following surgery. Of 664 patients 247 (37.2%) were positive for prostate cancer at first biopsy. Eighty-one out of 664 patients were subjected to a second biopsy for persistent elevation or increasing of PSA, or in case of tumor associated histological findings such as high PIN and ASAP. The cancer dete...
Urology, 1991
We report a case of primary malignant melanoma of the male urethra, increasing the total number o... more We report a case of primary malignant melanoma of the male urethra, increasing the total number of reported cases to 31. The experience with our case suggests that urinary cytology is a diagnostic method for malignant melanoma and essential in the preoperative diagnosis of this disease.
Current Opinion in Urology, 2008
As male genital corrective surgery is becoming increasingly requested by patients, the need to re... more As male genital corrective surgery is becoming increasingly requested by patients, the need to reach a general consensus on indications and techniques is now imperative. This review of published data provides an overview concerning patient selection modalities, benefits/risks and expected outcomes of surgery. Finally, the article focuses on ethical issues caused by the growing aesthetic nature of this surgery. Interest has been sparked by animal studies, the description of innovative techniques for lengthening and girth enhancement techniques, reconstructive phalloplasty and penile implant surgery. Data suggest that better objective surgical outcomes are possible, though in many cases long-term data and patient-rated satisfaction details are lacking. Most importantly, studies show the importance of having a multidisciplinary team in charge of patient selection. Although more long-term data are required before a general consensus can be reached, recent findings point to the absolute need for a thorough psychological assessment of men requesting penile enhancement surgery. Urologists should work in very close collaboration with psychologists or psychosexologists both during the preoperative phase (to verify eligibility for surgery) and afterwards (to provide counselling).
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
Background: The first Italian national guidelines were developed by the Italian Association of Ur... more Background: The first Italian national guidelines were developed by the Italian Association of Urologists and published in 2007. Since then, a number of new drugs or classes of drugs have emerged for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), new data have emerged on medical therapy (monotherapies and combination therapies), new surgical techniques have come into practice, and our understanding of disease pathogenesis has increased. Consequently, a new update of the guidelines has become necessary. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted to identify relevant papers published between 1 August 2006 and 12 December 2010. Publications before or after this timeframe were considered only if they were recognised as important milestones in the field or if the literature search did not identify publications within this timeframe. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.