Awais Taj - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Awais  Taj

Uploads

Papers by Awais Taj

Research paper thumbnail of A theory of prudential values and a rule utilitarian theory of morality

Social Choice and Welfare, 1995

Ethics can be divided into a theory of prudential values and a theory of morality in a narrower s... more Ethics can be divided into a theory of prudential values and a theory of morality in a narrower sense. My paper proposes a utilitarian -a rule-utilitariantheory of morality. But it deviates from most of the utilitarian tradition by rejecting the hedonistic and subjectivistic accounts of prudential values favored by many utilitarian writers. While economists tend to define people's utility levels in terms of their actual preferences, ethics must define them in terms of their informed preferences. To prefer A over B does not mean to have a stronger desire for A than for B. Rather, it means to regard one's access to A as being more important than one's access to B. Even though different people often have quite different preferences, their basic desires seem to be much the same. We must choose our moral rules, and our society's moral code as a whole, by their social utility. An important factor in determining their social utility are their expectation effects. Unlike the rule -utilitarian more code, the act -utilitarian moral code would be unable to give proper weight to these expectation effects. It would also unduly restrict our individual freedom. Finally, I shall argue against Kant that morality is primarily a servant of many other human values rather than itself the highest value of human life.

Research paper thumbnail of Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications

Health Care Analysis, 2003

Despite the prevalence of the terms utilitarianism and utilitarian in the health care and health ... more Despite the prevalence of the terms utilitarianism and utilitarian in the health care and health policy literature, anecdotal evidence suggests that authors are often not fully aware of the diversity of utilitarian theories, their principles, and implications. Further, it seems that authors often categorically reject utilitarianism under the assumption that it violates individual rights. The tendency of act utilitarianism to neglect individual rights is attenuated, however, by the diminishing marginal utility of wealth and the disutility of a protest by those who are disadvantaged. In practice, act utilitarians tend to introduce moral rules and preserve traditional rules. At the same time, the tenability of rule utilitarianism is limited because it ultimately collapses into act utilitarianism or a deontological theory. Negative utilitarianism is a viable utilitarian variant only if we accept complete aversion to suffering, ie, if we disregard any forgone opportunities to increase pleasure. Finally, the adoption of preference utilitarianism requires us to accept the subjectivity of individual claims which may be perceived as unfair.

Research paper thumbnail of A utilitarian theory of excuses

The Philosophical Review, 1969

Page 1. A UTILITARIAN THEORY OF EXCUSES IF WE AIM to formulate and defend a utilitarian theory of... more Page 1. A UTILITARIAN THEORY OF EXCUSES IF WE AIM to formulate and defend a utilitarian theory of excuses, we should begin with a rough indication of what the "theory" is to be about-what, in broad terms, an excuse is ...

Research paper thumbnail of A theory of prudential values and a rule utilitarian theory of morality

Social Choice and Welfare, 1995

Ethics can be divided into a theory of prudential values and a theory of morality in a narrower s... more Ethics can be divided into a theory of prudential values and a theory of morality in a narrower sense. My paper proposes a utilitarian -a rule-utilitariantheory of morality. But it deviates from most of the utilitarian tradition by rejecting the hedonistic and subjectivistic accounts of prudential values favored by many utilitarian writers. While economists tend to define people's utility levels in terms of their actual preferences, ethics must define them in terms of their informed preferences. To prefer A over B does not mean to have a stronger desire for A than for B. Rather, it means to regard one's access to A as being more important than one's access to B. Even though different people often have quite different preferences, their basic desires seem to be much the same. We must choose our moral rules, and our society's moral code as a whole, by their social utility. An important factor in determining their social utility are their expectation effects. Unlike the rule -utilitarian more code, the act -utilitarian moral code would be unable to give proper weight to these expectation effects. It would also unduly restrict our individual freedom. Finally, I shall argue against Kant that morality is primarily a servant of many other human values rather than itself the highest value of human life.

Research paper thumbnail of Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications

Health Care Analysis, 2003

Despite the prevalence of the terms utilitarianism and utilitarian in the health care and health ... more Despite the prevalence of the terms utilitarianism and utilitarian in the health care and health policy literature, anecdotal evidence suggests that authors are often not fully aware of the diversity of utilitarian theories, their principles, and implications. Further, it seems that authors often categorically reject utilitarianism under the assumption that it violates individual rights. The tendency of act utilitarianism to neglect individual rights is attenuated, however, by the diminishing marginal utility of wealth and the disutility of a protest by those who are disadvantaged. In practice, act utilitarians tend to introduce moral rules and preserve traditional rules. At the same time, the tenability of rule utilitarianism is limited because it ultimately collapses into act utilitarianism or a deontological theory. Negative utilitarianism is a viable utilitarian variant only if we accept complete aversion to suffering, ie, if we disregard any forgone opportunities to increase pleasure. Finally, the adoption of preference utilitarianism requires us to accept the subjectivity of individual claims which may be perceived as unfair.

Research paper thumbnail of A utilitarian theory of excuses

The Philosophical Review, 1969

Page 1. A UTILITARIAN THEORY OF EXCUSES IF WE AIM to formulate and defend a utilitarian theory of... more Page 1. A UTILITARIAN THEORY OF EXCUSES IF WE AIM to formulate and defend a utilitarian theory of excuses, we should begin with a rough indication of what the "theory" is to be about-what, in broad terms, an excuse is ...

Log In