Barry hafkin - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Barry hafkin

Research paper thumbnail of ANTI-INFECTIVE DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING (68fh) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration Marriott Washingtonian Center, Gaithersburg, MD

Research paper thumbnail of Effects of Food and Sucralfate on a Single Oral Dose of 500 Milligrams of Levofloxacin in Healthy Subjects

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administ... more The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C max ), the time to C max (T max ), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t 1/2 ), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CL R ), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (A e ) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and C max was slightly reduced (T max , 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P ‫؍‬ 0.002]; C max , 5.9 ؎ 1.3 and 5.1 ؎ 0.9 g/ml [90% confidence interval ‫؍‬ 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of C max and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 ؎ 3.2 g/ml and 47.9 ؎ 8.4 g ⅐ h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 ؎ 1.3 g/ml and 50.5 ؎ 8.1 g ⅐ h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t 1/2 , CL/F, CL R , and A e values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.

Research paper thumbnail of Worldwide Assessment of Linezolid's Clinical Safety and Tolerability: Comparator-Controlled Phase III Studies

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has 100% oral bioavailability and favorable activities ag... more Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has 100% oral bioavailability and favorable activities against grampositive pathogens including multidrug-resistant staphylococci, enterococci, and pneumococci. Safety assessments were conducted for 2,046 linezolid-treated patients and 2,001 comparator drug-treated patients from seven controlled clinical trials comparing the activities of linezolid and comparator drugs against nosocomial and community-acquired pneumonia, skin and skin structure infections, and methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Drug-related adverse events were primarily transient. The most frequent (>2%) adverse events caused by linezolid and the comparator drugs were diarrhea (4.3 and 3.2%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.074), nausea (3.4 and 2.3%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.036), and headache (2.2 and 1.3%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.047). Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related events (2.4 and 1.9%, respectively), serious adverse events (11.4 and 10.6%, respectively), and deaths (4.8 and 4.9%, respectively) were similar. No clinically significant drug-related hematologic events were reported, and laboratory safety data were comparable. In the first 6 months of postmarketing surveillance, hematologic abnormalities were reported in 0.1% of linezolid-treated patients, but no irreversible blood dyscrasias were documented. The risk for transient, reversible hematologic effects from treatment with linezolid should be considered together with the clinical benefits associated with its use.

Research paper thumbnail of Hematologic Effects of Linezolid: Summary of Clinical Experience

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002

Linezolid has been associated with reversible myelosuppression. Clinical trial data were evaluate... more Linezolid has been associated with reversible myelosuppression. Clinical trial data were evaluated for anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia and a slight increased risk for anemia were evident at >2 weeks of linezolid treatment. Hematologic abnormalities were consistent with mild, reversible, duration-dependent myelosuppression. Appropriate monitoring is warranted with linezolid use.

Research paper thumbnail of Randomized Comparison of Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus Oxacillin-Dicloxacillin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2000

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, a... more This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin-dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P ‫؍‬ 0.141; 95% confidence interval ؊1.58 to 11.25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Research paper thumbnail of CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS WITH SIGNIFICANT, RESISTANT, GRAM-POSTIVE INFECTIONS ENROLLED IN THE LINEZOLID COMPASSIONATE USE PROTOCOL

Critical Care Medicine, 1999

Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maint... more Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without your express consent. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy. ... Skip Navigation Links Home > ...

Research paper thumbnail of Linezolid versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002

Linezolid, the first available member of a new antibiotic class, the oxazolidinones, is broadly a... more Linezolid, the first available member of a new antibiotic class, the oxazolidinones, is broadly active against gram-positive bacteria, including drug-resistant strains. In this randomized, open-label trial, hospitalized adults with known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were treated with linezolid (600 mg twice daily; n=240) or vancomycin (1 g twice daily; n=220) for 7-28 days. S. aureus was isolated from 53% of patients; 93% of these isolates were MRSA. Skin and soft-tissue infection was the most common diagnosis, followed by pneumonia and urinary tract infection. At the test-of-cure visit (15-21 days after the end of therapy), among evaluable patients with MRSA, there was no statistical difference between the 2 treatment groups with respect to clinical cure rates (73.2% of patients in the linezolid group and 73.1% in the vancomycin group) or microbiological success rates (58.9% in the linezolid group and 63.2% in the vancomycin group). Both regimens were well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events.

Research paper thumbnail of ANTI-INFECTIVE DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING (68fh) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration Marriott Washingtonian Center, Gaithersburg, MD

Research paper thumbnail of Effects of Food and Sucralfate on a Single Oral Dose of 500 Milligrams of Levofloxacin in Healthy Subjects

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administ... more The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C max ), the time to C max (T max ), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t 1/2 ), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CL R ), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (A e ) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and C max was slightly reduced (T max , 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P ‫؍‬ 0.002]; C max , 5.9 ؎ 1.3 and 5.1 ؎ 0.9 g/ml [90% confidence interval ‫؍‬ 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of C max and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 ؎ 3.2 g/ml and 47.9 ؎ 8.4 g ⅐ h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 ؎ 1.3 g/ml and 50.5 ؎ 8.1 g ⅐ h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t 1/2 , CL/F, CL R , and A e values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.

Research paper thumbnail of Worldwide Assessment of Linezolid's Clinical Safety and Tolerability: Comparator-Controlled Phase III Studies

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has 100% oral bioavailability and favorable activities ag... more Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has 100% oral bioavailability and favorable activities against grampositive pathogens including multidrug-resistant staphylococci, enterococci, and pneumococci. Safety assessments were conducted for 2,046 linezolid-treated patients and 2,001 comparator drug-treated patients from seven controlled clinical trials comparing the activities of linezolid and comparator drugs against nosocomial and community-acquired pneumonia, skin and skin structure infections, and methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Drug-related adverse events were primarily transient. The most frequent (>2%) adverse events caused by linezolid and the comparator drugs were diarrhea (4.3 and 3.2%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.074), nausea (3.4 and 2.3%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.036), and headache (2.2 and 1.3%, respectively; P ‫؍‬ 0.047). Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related events (2.4 and 1.9%, respectively), serious adverse events (11.4 and 10.6%, respectively), and deaths (4.8 and 4.9%, respectively) were similar. No clinically significant drug-related hematologic events were reported, and laboratory safety data were comparable. In the first 6 months of postmarketing surveillance, hematologic abnormalities were reported in 0.1% of linezolid-treated patients, but no irreversible blood dyscrasias were documented. The risk for transient, reversible hematologic effects from treatment with linezolid should be considered together with the clinical benefits associated with its use.

Research paper thumbnail of Hematologic Effects of Linezolid: Summary of Clinical Experience

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002

Linezolid has been associated with reversible myelosuppression. Clinical trial data were evaluate... more Linezolid has been associated with reversible myelosuppression. Clinical trial data were evaluated for anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia and a slight increased risk for anemia were evident at >2 weeks of linezolid treatment. Hematologic abnormalities were consistent with mild, reversible, duration-dependent myelosuppression. Appropriate monitoring is warranted with linezolid use.

Research paper thumbnail of Randomized Comparison of Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus Oxacillin-Dicloxacillin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2000

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, a... more This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin-dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P ‫؍‬ 0.141; 95% confidence interval ؊1.58 to 11.25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Research paper thumbnail of CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS WITH SIGNIFICANT, RESISTANT, GRAM-POSTIVE INFECTIONS ENROLLED IN THE LINEZOLID COMPASSIONATE USE PROTOCOL

Critical Care Medicine, 1999

Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maint... more Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without your express consent. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy. ... Skip Navigation Links Home > ...

Research paper thumbnail of Linezolid versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002

Linezolid, the first available member of a new antibiotic class, the oxazolidinones, is broadly a... more Linezolid, the first available member of a new antibiotic class, the oxazolidinones, is broadly active against gram-positive bacteria, including drug-resistant strains. In this randomized, open-label trial, hospitalized adults with known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were treated with linezolid (600 mg twice daily; n=240) or vancomycin (1 g twice daily; n=220) for 7-28 days. S. aureus was isolated from 53% of patients; 93% of these isolates were MRSA. Skin and soft-tissue infection was the most common diagnosis, followed by pneumonia and urinary tract infection. At the test-of-cure visit (15-21 days after the end of therapy), among evaluable patients with MRSA, there was no statistical difference between the 2 treatment groups with respect to clinical cure rates (73.2% of patients in the linezolid group and 73.1% in the vancomycin group) or microbiological success rates (58.9% in the linezolid group and 63.2% in the vancomycin group). Both regimens were well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events.