David Harris - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by David Harris

Research paper thumbnail of Terry Stops and Frisks: The Troubling Use of Common Sense in a World of Empirical Data

The investigative detention doctrine first announced in Terry v. Ohio and amplified over the past... more The investigative detention doctrine first announced in Terry v. Ohio and amplified over the past fifty years has been much analyzed, praised, and criticized from a number of perspectives. Significantly, however, over this time period commentators have only occasionally questioned the Supreme Court’s “common sense” judgments regarding the factors sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for stops and frisks. For years, the Court has provided no empirical basis for its judgments, due in large part to the lack of reliable data. Now, with the emergence of comprehensive data on these police practices, much can be learned about the predictive power of suspect conduct and other predicates for law enforcement interventions. And what has been learned calls into question a number of factors that have been credited over many years. No observer of the legal system can fail to notice the growing role of data and empirical analysis in the courts. A disparate set of cases have turned in large...

Research paper thumbnail of The Importance of Research on Race and Policing: Making Race Salient to Individuals and Institutions Within Criminal Justice

Criminology & Public Policy, 2007

Research paper thumbnail of U.S. experiences with racial and ethnic profiling: history, current issues, and the future

Critical Criminology, 2006

Research paper thumbnail of Terry Stops and Frisks: The Troubling Use of Common Sense in a World of Empirical Data

The investigative detention doctrine first announced in Terry v. Ohio and amplified over the past... more The investigative detention doctrine first announced in Terry v. Ohio and amplified over the past fifty years has been much analyzed, praised, and criticized from a number of perspectives. Significantly, however, over this time period commentators have only occasionally questioned the Supreme Court’s “common sense” judgments regarding the factors sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for stops and frisks. For years, the Court has provided no empirical basis for its judgments, due in large part to the lack of reliable data. Now, with the emergence of comprehensive data on these police practices, much can be learned about the predictive power of suspect conduct and other predicates for law enforcement interventions. And what has been learned calls into question a number of factors that have been credited over many years. No observer of the legal system can fail to notice the growing role of data and empirical analysis in the courts. A disparate set of cases have turned in large...

Research paper thumbnail of The Importance of Research on Race and Policing: Making Race Salient to Individuals and Institutions Within Criminal Justice

Criminology & Public Policy, 2007

Research paper thumbnail of U.S. experiences with racial and ethnic profiling: history, current issues, and the future

Critical Criminology, 2006

Log In