Erin Dolan - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Erin Dolan

Research paper thumbnail of Guiding Students' Scientific Practice: Distinct and Common Roles for Teachers and Scientists

SAGE Open, 2014

Many science education programs involve scientists in K-12 education to support students' engagem... more Many science education programs involve scientists in K-12 education to support students' engagement in scientific practices and learning science process skills and scientific epistemologies. Little research has studied the actions of scientists in classrooms or how scientists' actions may (or may not) supplement or complement the actions of teachers. In this descriptive study, we explore how teachers and scientists, working in pairs, guide high school students in the practice of scientific experimentation. In particular, we study the ways by which teachers and scientists act independently and in concert to guide students in designing and conducting biology experiments with unknown outcomes. We analyzed video recordings of classroom instruction in two different school settings, focusing on teachers' and scientists' acts as they are manifested through their language-in-use during face-to-face interactions with students. We argue that scientists and teachers act to support students in scientific experimentation in both distinct and common ways influenced by the particular teaching acts they perform and distinct authority roles they possess in the classroom (e.g., classroom authority vs. scientific authority).

Research paper thumbnail of Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report

Cell Biology Education, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of The Laboratory Course Assessment Survey: A Tool to Measure Three Dimensions of Research-Course Design

CBE life sciences education, 2015

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are increasingly being offered as scalabl... more Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are increasingly being offered as scalable ways to involve undergraduates in research. Yet few if any design features that make CUREs effective have been identified. We developed a 17-item survey instrument, the Laboratory Course Assessment Survey (LCAS), that measures students' perceptions of three design features of biology lab courses: 1) collaboration, 2) discovery and relevance, and 3) iteration. We assessed the psychometric properties of the LCAS using established methods for instrument design and validation. We also assessed the ability of the LCAS to differentiate between CUREs and traditional laboratory courses, and found that the discovery and relevance and iteration scales differentiated between these groups. Our results indicate that the LCAS is suited for characterizing and comparing undergraduate biology lab courses and should be useful for determining the relative importance of the three design features for a...

Research paper thumbnail of Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: an agenda for future research and evaluation

CBE life sciences education, Jan 2, 2015

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are being championed as scalable ways of ... more Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are being championed as scalable ways of involving undergraduates in science research. Studies of CUREs have shown that participating students achieve many of the same outcomes as students who complete research internships. However, CUREs vary widely in their design and implementation, and aspects of CUREs that are necessary and sufficient to achieve desired student outcomes have not been elucidated. To guide future research aimed at understanding the causal mechanisms underlying CURE efficacy, we used a systems approach to generate pathway models representing hypotheses of how CURE outcomes are achieved. We started by reviewing studies of CUREs and research internships to generate a comprehensive set of outcomes of research experiences, determining the level of evidence supporting each outcome. We then used this body of research and drew from learning theory to hypothesize connections between what students do during CUREs and ...

Research paper thumbnail of GETTING STARTED TO MAKE AN IMPACT IN EDUCATION AND OUTREACH

Research paper thumbnail of Teaching quantitative biology: goals, assessments, and resources

Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2014

More than a decade has passed since the publication of BIO2010, calling for an increased emphasis... more More than a decade has passed since the publication of BIO2010, calling for an increased emphasis on quantitative skills in the undergraduate biology curriculum. In that time, relatively few papers have been published that describe educational innovations in quantitative biology or provide evidence of their effects on students. Using a "backward design" framework, we lay out quantitative skill and attitude goals, assessment strategies, and teaching resources to help biologists teach more quantitatively. Collaborations between quantitative biologists and education researchers are necessary to develop a broader and more appropriate suite of assessment tools, and to provide much-needed evidence on how particular teaching strategies affect biology students' quantitative skill development and attitudes toward quantitative work.

Research paper thumbnail of Factors influencing student perceptions of high-school science laboratory environments

Learning Environments Research, 2013

Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive studen... more Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive student attitudes about science and developing students' interest in science and ability to use equipment. An expanding body of research has demonstrated the significant influence of laboratory environment on student learning. Further research has demonstrated differences in student perceptions based on giftedness. To explore the relationship between giftedness and students' perceptions of their learning environment, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in biology courses, including courses designated for high-achieving versus regular-achieving students. In addition, to explore the relationship between students' perceptions and the extent of their experience with laboratory learning in a particular discipline, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in first-year biology courses versus elective biology courses that require first-year biology as a prerequisite. We found that students in highachieving courses had a more favourable perception of all aspects of their learning environment when compared with students in regular courses. In addition, student perceptions of their laboratory appeared to be influenced by the extent of their experience in learning science. Perceptions were consistent amongst regular-and high-achieving students regardless of grade level. In addition, perceptions of students in first year and beyond were consistent regardless of grade level. These findings have critical applications in curriculum development as well as in the classroom. Teachers can use student perceptions of their learning environment to emphasize critical pedagogical approaches and modify other areas that enable enhancement of the science laboratory learning environment.

Research paper thumbnail of Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry

Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2010

Teaching by inquiry is touted for its potential to encourage students to reason scientifically. Y... more Teaching by inquiry is touted for its potential to encourage students to reason scientifically. Yet, even when inquiry teaching is practiced, complexity of students' reasoning may be limited or unbalanced. We describe an analytic tool for recognizing when students are engaged in complex reasoning during inquiry teaching. Using classrooms that represented ''best case scenarios'' for inquiry teaching, we adapted and applied a matrix to categorize the complexity of students' reasoning. Our results revealed points when students' reasoning was quite complex and occasions when their reasoning was limited by the curriculum, instructional choices, or students' unprompted prescription. We propose that teachers use the matrix as a springboard for reflection and discussion that takes a sustained, critical view of inquiry teaching practice. Posing preliminary hypotheses B, J P Designing and conducting the research Selecting variables J B, P Considering experimentally controlled conditions B J P Explaining results Considering meaning of data representations B, J, P Considering limitations or flaws of experiment J B P Connecting data to research question J B, P Providing suggestions for future research J B, P Communicating and defending findings B, J, P B Bonnie's class; J Janet's class; P PREP context Recognizing Reasoning During Inquiry Teaching 43

Research paper thumbnail of The Project Ownership Survey: Measuring Differences in Scientific Inquiry Experiences

Cell Biology Education, 2014

A growing body of research documents the positive outcomes of research experiences for undergradu... more A growing body of research documents the positive outcomes of research experiences for undergraduates, including increased persistence in science. Study of undergraduate lab learning experiences has demonstrated that the design of the experience influences the extent to which students report ownership of the project and that project ownership is one of the psychosocial factors involved in student retention in the sciences. To date, methods for measuring project ownership have not been suitable for the collection of larger data sets. The current study aims to rectify this by developing, presenting, and evaluating a new instrument for measuring project ownership. Eighteen scaled items were generated based on prior research and theory related to project ownership and combined with 30 items shown to measure respondents' emotions about an experience, resulting in the Project Ownership survey (POS). The POS was analyzed to determine its dimensionality, reliability, and validity. The POS had a coefficient alpha of 0.92 and thus has high internal consistency. Known-groups validity was analyzed through the ability of the instrument to differentiate between students who studied in traditional versus research-based laboratory courses. The POS scales as differentiated between the groups and findings paralleled previous results in relation to the characteristics of project ownership.

Research paper thumbnail of Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report

Cell Biology Education, 2014

The Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Network (CUREnet) was initiated in 2012 with ... more The Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Network (CUREnet) was initiated in 2012 with funding from the National Science Foundation program for Research Coordination Networks in Undergraduate Biology Education. CUREnet aims to address topics, problems, and opportunities inherent to integrating research experiences into undergraduate courses. During CUREnet meetings and discussions, it became apparent that there is need for a clear definition of what constitutes a CURE and systematic exploration of what makes CUREs meaningful in terms of student learning. Thus, we assembled a small working group of people with expertise in CURE instruction and assessment to: 1) draft an operational definition of a CURE, with the aim of defining what makes a laboratory course or project a "research experience"; 2) summarize research on CUREs, as well as findings from studies of undergraduate research internships that would be useful for thinking about how students are influenced by participating in CUREs; and 3) identify areas of greatest need with respect to CURE assessment, and directions for future research on and evaluation of CUREs. This report summarizes the outcomes and recommendations of this meeting.

Research paper thumbnail of Adding to the Biology Education Research Tool Kit: Research Methods Essays

Cell Biology Education, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of DNA Biotechnology Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Protein Electrophoresis Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Sustaining Biotechnology Education: Challenges and Strategies

Research paper thumbnail of Fralin Life Science Institute Protein Electrophoresis Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Fralin Life Science Institute DNA Biotechnology Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Partnership for Research & Education in Plants: A teacher-student-scientist collaboration

Research paper thumbnail of Undergraduate students’ development of social, cultural, and human capital in a networked research experience

Recent calls for reform in undergraduate biology education have emphasized integrating research e... more Recent calls for reform in undergraduate biology education have emphasized integrating research experiences into the learning experiences of all undergraduates. Contemporary science research increasingly demands collaboration across disciplines and institutions to investigate complex research questions, providing new contexts and models for involving undergraduates in research. In this study, we examined the experiences of undergraduates participating in a multi-institution and interdisciplinary biology research network. Unlike the traditional apprenticeship model of research, in which a student participates in research under the guidance of a single faculty member, students participating in networked research have the opportunity to develop relationships with additional faculty and students working in other areas of the project, at their own and at other institutions. We examined how students in this network develop social ties and to what extent a networked research experience affords opportunities for students to develop social, cultural, and human capital. Most studies of undergraduate involvement in science research have focused on documenting student outcomes rather than elucidating how students gain access to research experiences or how elements of research participation lead to desired student outcomes. By taking a qualitative approach framed by capital theories, we have identified Lead editor: M. Reiss Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

Research paper thumbnail of Guiding Students' Scientific Practice: Distinct and Common Roles for Teachers and Scientists

SAGE Open, 2014

Many science education programs involve scientists in K-12 education to support students' engagem... more Many science education programs involve scientists in K-12 education to support students' engagement in scientific practices and learning science process skills and scientific epistemologies. Little research has studied the actions of scientists in classrooms or how scientists' actions may (or may not) supplement or complement the actions of teachers. In this descriptive study, we explore how teachers and scientists, working in pairs, guide high school students in the practice of scientific experimentation. In particular, we study the ways by which teachers and scientists act independently and in concert to guide students in designing and conducting biology experiments with unknown outcomes. We analyzed video recordings of classroom instruction in two different school settings, focusing on teachers' and scientists' acts as they are manifested through their language-in-use during face-to-face interactions with students. We argue that scientists and teachers act to support students in scientific experimentation in both distinct and common ways influenced by the particular teaching acts they perform and distinct authority roles they possess in the classroom (e.g., classroom authority vs. scientific authority).

Research paper thumbnail of Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report

Cell Biology Education, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of The Laboratory Course Assessment Survey: A Tool to Measure Three Dimensions of Research-Course Design

CBE life sciences education, 2015

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are increasingly being offered as scalabl... more Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are increasingly being offered as scalable ways to involve undergraduates in research. Yet few if any design features that make CUREs effective have been identified. We developed a 17-item survey instrument, the Laboratory Course Assessment Survey (LCAS), that measures students' perceptions of three design features of biology lab courses: 1) collaboration, 2) discovery and relevance, and 3) iteration. We assessed the psychometric properties of the LCAS using established methods for instrument design and validation. We also assessed the ability of the LCAS to differentiate between CUREs and traditional laboratory courses, and found that the discovery and relevance and iteration scales differentiated between these groups. Our results indicate that the LCAS is suited for characterizing and comparing undergraduate biology lab courses and should be useful for determining the relative importance of the three design features for a...

Research paper thumbnail of Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: an agenda for future research and evaluation

CBE life sciences education, Jan 2, 2015

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are being championed as scalable ways of ... more Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are being championed as scalable ways of involving undergraduates in science research. Studies of CUREs have shown that participating students achieve many of the same outcomes as students who complete research internships. However, CUREs vary widely in their design and implementation, and aspects of CUREs that are necessary and sufficient to achieve desired student outcomes have not been elucidated. To guide future research aimed at understanding the causal mechanisms underlying CURE efficacy, we used a systems approach to generate pathway models representing hypotheses of how CURE outcomes are achieved. We started by reviewing studies of CUREs and research internships to generate a comprehensive set of outcomes of research experiences, determining the level of evidence supporting each outcome. We then used this body of research and drew from learning theory to hypothesize connections between what students do during CUREs and ...

Research paper thumbnail of GETTING STARTED TO MAKE AN IMPACT IN EDUCATION AND OUTREACH

Research paper thumbnail of Teaching quantitative biology: goals, assessments, and resources

Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2014

More than a decade has passed since the publication of BIO2010, calling for an increased emphasis... more More than a decade has passed since the publication of BIO2010, calling for an increased emphasis on quantitative skills in the undergraduate biology curriculum. In that time, relatively few papers have been published that describe educational innovations in quantitative biology or provide evidence of their effects on students. Using a "backward design" framework, we lay out quantitative skill and attitude goals, assessment strategies, and teaching resources to help biologists teach more quantitatively. Collaborations between quantitative biologists and education researchers are necessary to develop a broader and more appropriate suite of assessment tools, and to provide much-needed evidence on how particular teaching strategies affect biology students' quantitative skill development and attitudes toward quantitative work.

Research paper thumbnail of Factors influencing student perceptions of high-school science laboratory environments

Learning Environments Research, 2013

Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive studen... more Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive student attitudes about science and developing students' interest in science and ability to use equipment. An expanding body of research has demonstrated the significant influence of laboratory environment on student learning. Further research has demonstrated differences in student perceptions based on giftedness. To explore the relationship between giftedness and students' perceptions of their learning environment, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in biology courses, including courses designated for high-achieving versus regular-achieving students. In addition, to explore the relationship between students' perceptions and the extent of their experience with laboratory learning in a particular discipline, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in first-year biology courses versus elective biology courses that require first-year biology as a prerequisite. We found that students in highachieving courses had a more favourable perception of all aspects of their learning environment when compared with students in regular courses. In addition, student perceptions of their laboratory appeared to be influenced by the extent of their experience in learning science. Perceptions were consistent amongst regular-and high-achieving students regardless of grade level. In addition, perceptions of students in first year and beyond were consistent regardless of grade level. These findings have critical applications in curriculum development as well as in the classroom. Teachers can use student perceptions of their learning environment to emphasize critical pedagogical approaches and modify other areas that enable enhancement of the science laboratory learning environment.

Research paper thumbnail of Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry

Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2010

Teaching by inquiry is touted for its potential to encourage students to reason scientifically. Y... more Teaching by inquiry is touted for its potential to encourage students to reason scientifically. Yet, even when inquiry teaching is practiced, complexity of students' reasoning may be limited or unbalanced. We describe an analytic tool for recognizing when students are engaged in complex reasoning during inquiry teaching. Using classrooms that represented ''best case scenarios'' for inquiry teaching, we adapted and applied a matrix to categorize the complexity of students' reasoning. Our results revealed points when students' reasoning was quite complex and occasions when their reasoning was limited by the curriculum, instructional choices, or students' unprompted prescription. We propose that teachers use the matrix as a springboard for reflection and discussion that takes a sustained, critical view of inquiry teaching practice. Posing preliminary hypotheses B, J P Designing and conducting the research Selecting variables J B, P Considering experimentally controlled conditions B J P Explaining results Considering meaning of data representations B, J, P Considering limitations or flaws of experiment J B P Connecting data to research question J B, P Providing suggestions for future research J B, P Communicating and defending findings B, J, P B Bonnie's class; J Janet's class; P PREP context Recognizing Reasoning During Inquiry Teaching 43

Research paper thumbnail of The Project Ownership Survey: Measuring Differences in Scientific Inquiry Experiences

Cell Biology Education, 2014

A growing body of research documents the positive outcomes of research experiences for undergradu... more A growing body of research documents the positive outcomes of research experiences for undergraduates, including increased persistence in science. Study of undergraduate lab learning experiences has demonstrated that the design of the experience influences the extent to which students report ownership of the project and that project ownership is one of the psychosocial factors involved in student retention in the sciences. To date, methods for measuring project ownership have not been suitable for the collection of larger data sets. The current study aims to rectify this by developing, presenting, and evaluating a new instrument for measuring project ownership. Eighteen scaled items were generated based on prior research and theory related to project ownership and combined with 30 items shown to measure respondents' emotions about an experience, resulting in the Project Ownership survey (POS). The POS was analyzed to determine its dimensionality, reliability, and validity. The POS had a coefficient alpha of 0.92 and thus has high internal consistency. Known-groups validity was analyzed through the ability of the instrument to differentiate between students who studied in traditional versus research-based laboratory courses. The POS scales as differentiated between the groups and findings paralleled previous results in relation to the characteristics of project ownership.

Research paper thumbnail of Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report

Cell Biology Education, 2014

The Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Network (CUREnet) was initiated in 2012 with ... more The Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Network (CUREnet) was initiated in 2012 with funding from the National Science Foundation program for Research Coordination Networks in Undergraduate Biology Education. CUREnet aims to address topics, problems, and opportunities inherent to integrating research experiences into undergraduate courses. During CUREnet meetings and discussions, it became apparent that there is need for a clear definition of what constitutes a CURE and systematic exploration of what makes CUREs meaningful in terms of student learning. Thus, we assembled a small working group of people with expertise in CURE instruction and assessment to: 1) draft an operational definition of a CURE, with the aim of defining what makes a laboratory course or project a "research experience"; 2) summarize research on CUREs, as well as findings from studies of undergraduate research internships that would be useful for thinking about how students are influenced by participating in CUREs; and 3) identify areas of greatest need with respect to CURE assessment, and directions for future research on and evaluation of CUREs. This report summarizes the outcomes and recommendations of this meeting.

Research paper thumbnail of Adding to the Biology Education Research Tool Kit: Research Methods Essays

Cell Biology Education, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of DNA Biotechnology Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Protein Electrophoresis Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Sustaining Biotechnology Education: Challenges and Strategies

Research paper thumbnail of Fralin Life Science Institute Protein Electrophoresis Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Fralin Life Science Institute DNA Biotechnology Kit

Research paper thumbnail of Partnership for Research & Education in Plants: A teacher-student-scientist collaboration

Research paper thumbnail of Undergraduate students’ development of social, cultural, and human capital in a networked research experience

Recent calls for reform in undergraduate biology education have emphasized integrating research e... more Recent calls for reform in undergraduate biology education have emphasized integrating research experiences into the learning experiences of all undergraduates. Contemporary science research increasingly demands collaboration across disciplines and institutions to investigate complex research questions, providing new contexts and models for involving undergraduates in research. In this study, we examined the experiences of undergraduates participating in a multi-institution and interdisciplinary biology research network. Unlike the traditional apprenticeship model of research, in which a student participates in research under the guidance of a single faculty member, students participating in networked research have the opportunity to develop relationships with additional faculty and students working in other areas of the project, at their own and at other institutions. We examined how students in this network develop social ties and to what extent a networked research experience affords opportunities for students to develop social, cultural, and human capital. Most studies of undergraduate involvement in science research have focused on documenting student outcomes rather than elucidating how students gain access to research experiences or how elements of research participation lead to desired student outcomes. By taking a qualitative approach framed by capital theories, we have identified Lead editor: M. Reiss Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (