Francisco Alvarado - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Francisco Alvarado

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1967

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biophysics including Photosynthesis, 1965

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biophysics including Photosynthesis, 1966

Journal of Chromatography A, 1969

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1962

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1957

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1987

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1985

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology, 1977

The effect of harmaline on rabbit brush border sucrase has been studied at pH 6.8. An initial ana... more The effect of harmaline on rabbit brush border sucrase has been studied at pH 6.8. An initial analysis in classical kinetic terms revealed harmaline to be a fully competitive inhibitor of the substrate, sucrose. In spite of this result however, the following hypothesis has been tested. Harmaline, which is positively charged in the physiological range of pH, might in fact compete, not directly with the substrate site, but rather with an allosterically-related sodium-binding site which has been postulated to be involved in the activation of sucrase by the alkali-metal ions (Mahmood and Alvarado, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 168, 585, 1975). Because of its size, harmaline, when bound to the metal site, could at least partially overlap with the substrate site, thereby behaving as if it were an authentic fully competitive inhibitor of the substrate. This hypothesis appears to be confirmed by the fact that the alkali metals can completely reverse the inhibition caused by harmaline.

Mathematical Biosciences, 1992

Current concepts of pH-dependent enzyme function are expanded to consider enzymes with up to four... more Current concepts of pH-dependent enzyme function are expanded to consider enzymes with up to four key proton families. In an earlier paper the authors extended classical theory to explain the existence, in the acid ionization reaction, of two functionally distinct, V and K, proton families, exemplified by the 1988 sucrase three-proton-families model of Vasseur et al. They now propose that enzymes having two distinguishable proton families at each side of the pH-activity curves exist in nature although there is no previously published evidence of their existence. The resulting, more general, four-proton-families model is treated as a useful framework from which submodels can be derived by simplification, the simplest being the 1911 linear model of Michaelis and Davidsohn, which took into account two proton families out of the theoretical maximum of four proposed here. It is shown that whether a three-proton-families or a four-proton-families model can explain sucrase better is not merely a question of theory but also involves the practical question of having enough data, at each side of the pH spectrum, to permit making an unequivocal choice between the two alternatives. The paper concludes with a discussion of substrate-induced pK shifts according to both models.

Mathematical Biosciences, 1989

Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 1990

Tris and two of its hydroxylated amine analogs were examined in a metal-free, universal n-butylam... more Tris and two of its hydroxylated amine analogs were examined in a metal-free, universal n-butylamine buffer, for their interaction with intestinal brush border sucrase. Our recent three-proton-families model (Vasseur, van Melle, Frangne and Alvarado (1988) Biochem. J., 251, 667-675) has provided the sucrase pK values necessary to interpret the present work. At pH 5.2, 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol (PM) causes activation whereas Tris has a concentration-dependent biphasic effect, first causing activation, then fully competitive inhibition. The amine species causing activation is the protonated, cationic form. The difference between the two amines is related to the fact that Tris has a much lower pKa value than PM (respectively, 8.2 and 9.8). Even at pH 5.2, Tris (but not PM) exists as a significant proportion of the free base which, by inhibiting the enzyme fully competitively, overshadows the activating effect of the cationic, protonated amine. Above pH 6.8, both Tris and PM act as fully competitive inhibitors. These inhibitions increase monotonically between pH 6.5 and 8.0 but, above pH 8, inhibition by 2.5 mM Tris tends to diminish whereas inhibition by 40 mM PM increases abruptly to be essentially complete at pH 9.3 and above. As pH increases from 7.6 to 9.0, the apparent affinity of the free amine bases decreases whereas that of the cationic, protonated amines, increases. In this way, the protonated amines replace their corresponding free bases as the most potent inhibitors at high pH. The pH-dependent inhibition by 300 mM Li+ is essentially complete at pH 8, independent of the presence or absence of either 2.5 mM Tris or 40 mM PM. Even at pH 7.6, an excess (300 mM) of Li+ causes significant increases in the apparent Ki value of each Tris, PD (2-amino-2-methyl-1-3-propanediol) and PM, suggesting the possibility of a relation between the effects of Li+ and those of the hydroxylated amines which in fact are mutually exclusive inhibitors. The inhibitory results are interpreted in terms of a mechanistic model in which the free bases bind at two distinct sites in the enzyme&amp;#39;s active center. Binding at the glucosyl sub-site occurs through the amine&amp;#39;s free hydroxyl groups. This positioning facilitates the interaction between the lone electron pair of the deprotonated amino group with a proton donor in the enzyme&amp;#39;s active center, characterized by a pK0 around 8.1. When this same group deprotonates, then the protonated amines acting as proton donors replace the free bases as the species giving fully competitive inhibition of sucrase.