D. Gault - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by D. Gault
Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1999
In ruby laser-assisted hair removal, microscopic damage is often seen in the basal epidermal cell... more In ruby laser-assisted hair removal, microscopic damage is often seen in the basal epidermal cells, where melanosomes are concentrated. It is not known whether this treatment leads to cellular hyperproliferation. It was the aim of this study to investigate this. Ten white patients were treated with the Chromos 694-nm Depilation Ruby Laser, and biopsies taken before and after treatments to assess the presence of cell hyperproliferation, which normally accompanies epidermal damage, with immunohistochemical staining of keratin 16 and Ki67. No evidence of cell hyperproliferation was seen in all specimens examined after ruby laser irradiation. The authors conclude that despite the possible microscopic damages seen in the basal epidermis after laser hair removal, there is no evidence of cellular hyperproliferation. This is in contrast to ultraviolet-irradiated cell damage, in which increased basal cell turnover is seen.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2010
Reconstruction of the human ear with a bone-anchored prosthesis is a widely accepted alternative ... more Reconstruction of the human ear with a bone-anchored prosthesis is a widely accepted alternative when autologous reconstruction is technically impossible or declined by the individual. However, there are relatively few data in the literature documenting patient satisfaction with this form of reconstruction. This study examines different aspects of patient satisfaction using an eighteen-point postal questionnaire to measure patient outcomes against a Likert rating scale. The questionnaire was sent to 33 patients who completed prosthetic ear reconstruction over a 16 year period at a specialist plastic surgery unit in the United Kingdom. Medical case notes for these cases were also reviewed. Twenty completed questionnaires were returned. The response rate was 61%. The majority of patients were satisfied with the aesthetics, ease of handling and comfort of the bone-anchored implant and prosthesis. However, the majority of patients was only moderately satisfied or was dissatisfied with this method of reconstruction. Specifically, 15 of the respondents reported skin problems around the abutments of the bone-anchored implant with 10 patients reporting ongoing skin complications. Granulation tissue was the most common skin problem (12 cases) followed by local infection (10 cases). Interestingly, despite the chronic skin problems, most patients indicated that they would undergo the same procedure again or would recommend it to others. Our survey shows that patients fitted with a Branemark-type bone-anchored implant for ear reconstruction are pleased with the aesthetic appearance but experience multiple, chronic, skin complications and other implant related problems. These affect their satisfaction with this method of reconstruction. Our findings may have significant implications for patients and surgeons considering this form of reconstruction and for the institutions making decisions about funding this treatment.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1997
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dec 1, 1998
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, Oct 1, 2004
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery, Feb 1, 2006
Plastic Amp Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
J Hand Surg Brit Eur Vol, 1991
European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery, Feb 1, 1990
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery, Feb 1, 2010
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, Aug 1, 1992
British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)
British Journal of Plastic Surgery
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2014
Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1999
In ruby laser-assisted hair removal, microscopic damage is often seen in the basal epidermal cell... more In ruby laser-assisted hair removal, microscopic damage is often seen in the basal epidermal cells, where melanosomes are concentrated. It is not known whether this treatment leads to cellular hyperproliferation. It was the aim of this study to investigate this. Ten white patients were treated with the Chromos 694-nm Depilation Ruby Laser, and biopsies taken before and after treatments to assess the presence of cell hyperproliferation, which normally accompanies epidermal damage, with immunohistochemical staining of keratin 16 and Ki67. No evidence of cell hyperproliferation was seen in all specimens examined after ruby laser irradiation. The authors conclude that despite the possible microscopic damages seen in the basal epidermis after laser hair removal, there is no evidence of cellular hyperproliferation. This is in contrast to ultraviolet-irradiated cell damage, in which increased basal cell turnover is seen.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2010
Reconstruction of the human ear with a bone-anchored prosthesis is a widely accepted alternative ... more Reconstruction of the human ear with a bone-anchored prosthesis is a widely accepted alternative when autologous reconstruction is technically impossible or declined by the individual. However, there are relatively few data in the literature documenting patient satisfaction with this form of reconstruction. This study examines different aspects of patient satisfaction using an eighteen-point postal questionnaire to measure patient outcomes against a Likert rating scale. The questionnaire was sent to 33 patients who completed prosthetic ear reconstruction over a 16 year period at a specialist plastic surgery unit in the United Kingdom. Medical case notes for these cases were also reviewed. Twenty completed questionnaires were returned. The response rate was 61%. The majority of patients were satisfied with the aesthetics, ease of handling and comfort of the bone-anchored implant and prosthesis. However, the majority of patients was only moderately satisfied or was dissatisfied with this method of reconstruction. Specifically, 15 of the respondents reported skin problems around the abutments of the bone-anchored implant with 10 patients reporting ongoing skin complications. Granulation tissue was the most common skin problem (12 cases) followed by local infection (10 cases). Interestingly, despite the chronic skin problems, most patients indicated that they would undergo the same procedure again or would recommend it to others. Our survey shows that patients fitted with a Branemark-type bone-anchored implant for ear reconstruction are pleased with the aesthetic appearance but experience multiple, chronic, skin complications and other implant related problems. These affect their satisfaction with this method of reconstruction. Our findings may have significant implications for patients and surgeons considering this form of reconstruction and for the institutions making decisions about funding this treatment.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1997
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dec 1, 1998
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, Oct 1, 2004
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery, Feb 1, 2006
Plastic Amp Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
J Hand Surg Brit Eur Vol, 1991
European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery, Feb 1, 1990
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery, Feb 1, 2010
British Journal of Plastic Surgery, Aug 1, 1992
British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)
British Journal of Plastic Surgery
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2014