Harry Tolley - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Harry Tolley

Harvard Theological Review, 2021

Please see publisher's website.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Athens Journal of History, 2019

The dearth of accurately datable documents from the time (323–c. 275 BCE) of Alexander the Great’... more The dearth of accurately datable documents from the time (323–c. 275 BCE) of Alexander the Great’s Successors (also known as the Diadochi or Diadochoi) has contributed to uncertainty regarding the dating of key events from this time. In attempting to explain these inconsistencies, recent scholarship has focused on various different chronologies, some of which are described as “high” and “low.” It would seem that particular importance would be assigned to the date of the end of the reign of Alexander IV, Alexander the Great’s lone legitimate heir. However, little scholarly attention has been paid to the possible date of this very important transition that marked the end of the Macedonian Argead Dynasty. The current article attempts a thorough investigation of this event by examining remaining historical accounts and surviving contemporary government documents along with epigraphical evidence and archaeological discoveries. This information is then utilized in an attempt to arrive at a more precise date for the end of Alexander IV’s reign and the end of the satrapies ruling in his name

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

The Journal of Theological Studies, 2012

A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria's now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagi... more A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria's now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagite material within the writings of Maximus Confessor/John of Scythopolis, claims that Luke the Evangelist wrote the Jewish-Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus. This information seems so fantastic that several scholars have attempted to explain away the attribution through the composition of various hypotheses. The most popular of these was published by Johannes Ernest Grabe in his Spicilegium SS Patrum in 1698. Despite being cited by scholars from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, Grabe's hypothesis has never been the subject of a detailed investigation. Two conclusions result from an investigation of his hypothesis: Grabe's claims of textual corruption are unfounded; and it seems clear that Clement actually did claim Lukan authorship for Jason and Papiscus.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Hermes, 2018

The obscure 2nd century CE writer Ariston of Pella is mentioned in two accepted works: Eusebius' ... more The obscure 2nd century CE writer Ariston of Pella is mentioned in two accepted works: Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History and John of Scythopolis / Maximus Confessor's Notes on the Mystic Theology of the Areopagite. He is also mentioned in two other works but the attributions are currently regarded with suspicion: Moses of Chorene's History of Armenia and the Chronicon Paschale. Upon further investigation, it appears that an 18th century theory regarding Ariston's presence in the Chronicon Paschale as the author of a previously unknown Christian Apology is correct. Also, the investigation of the theory demonstrates that previous claims regarding the Chronicon material's reliance upon Ecclesiastical History are incorrect. With these points established, it becomes clear that Ariston can be regarded as the author of a Christian Apology addressed to the Roman Emperor Hadrian, with an internal assigned date during the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 CE). This attribution sheds new light on Ariston of Pella and establishes a more reliable date for his floruit. In addition, it establishes a new Christian Apology from the time of the reign of Emperor Hadrian. It also contributes new information about Eusebius' sources for Ecclesiastical History and further information about Aquila of Pontus, Emperor Hadrian and the Bar Kokhba Revolt.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

In 1964, the remains of a large house were discovered in the Israeli city of Beth-Shean/ Beth-Sha... more In 1964, the remains of a large house were discovered in the Israeli city of Beth-Shean/ Beth-Shan (also known as Scythopolis). Once excavated, the mid-5th century CE house was found to contain many interesting artifacts, but none as fascinating as a large, elaborate mosaic and two inscribed column lintels. The meanings of the words and images found in the mosaic have spawned several theories, but it is our contention that the theories about the inscriptions in the mosaic must be viewed in light of an intriguing inscription found on one of the column lintels. Unfortunately, of the two major studies published since the initial publication of the house's discovery, neither attempts to address the column lintels. The current article seeks to rectify this situation and reexamines the previous theories and the mosaic inscriptions in light of the inscription from one of the column lintels. The result is a series of conclusions that, it is hoped, help to clarify certain important points regarding the House of Leontis Kloubas.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Biocentrism –the opinion that non-human life and human life have a similar value—is not especiall... more Biocentrism –the opinion that non-human life and human life have a similar value—is not especially difficult to rationalize. However, it is an opinion that comes with a great deal of preconceived notions attached to it, especially regarding the opinions of any philosopher who attempts to demonstrate how Biocentrism can actually be introduced into human society. The following paper explores how Biocentrism initially had a difficult time being taken seriously outside of pro-Biocentric circles. It also demonstrates how Biocentric philosophers were routinely labeled " radicals " for simply attempting to argue in favor of Biocentrism.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Harvard Theological Review, 2021

Please see publisher's website.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Athens Journal of History, 2019

The dearth of accurately datable documents from the time (323–c. 275 BCE) of Alexander the Great’... more The dearth of accurately datable documents from the time (323–c. 275 BCE) of Alexander the Great’s Successors (also known as the Diadochi or Diadochoi) has contributed to uncertainty regarding the dating of key events from this time. In attempting to explain these inconsistencies, recent scholarship has focused on various different chronologies, some of which are described as “high” and “low.” It would seem that particular importance would be assigned to the date of the end of the reign of Alexander IV, Alexander the Great’s lone legitimate heir. However, little scholarly attention has been paid to the possible date of this very important transition that marked the end of the Macedonian Argead Dynasty. The current article attempts a thorough investigation of this event by examining remaining historical accounts and surviving contemporary government documents along with epigraphical evidence and archaeological discoveries. This information is then utilized in an attempt to arrive at a more precise date for the end of Alexander IV’s reign and the end of the satrapies ruling in his name

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

The Journal of Theological Studies, 2012

A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria's now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagi... more A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria's now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagite material within the writings of Maximus Confessor/John of Scythopolis, claims that Luke the Evangelist wrote the Jewish-Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus. This information seems so fantastic that several scholars have attempted to explain away the attribution through the composition of various hypotheses. The most popular of these was published by Johannes Ernest Grabe in his Spicilegium SS Patrum in 1698. Despite being cited by scholars from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, Grabe's hypothesis has never been the subject of a detailed investigation. Two conclusions result from an investigation of his hypothesis: Grabe's claims of textual corruption are unfounded; and it seems clear that Clement actually did claim Lukan authorship for Jason and Papiscus.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Hermes, 2018

The obscure 2nd century CE writer Ariston of Pella is mentioned in two accepted works: Eusebius' ... more The obscure 2nd century CE writer Ariston of Pella is mentioned in two accepted works: Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History and John of Scythopolis / Maximus Confessor's Notes on the Mystic Theology of the Areopagite. He is also mentioned in two other works but the attributions are currently regarded with suspicion: Moses of Chorene's History of Armenia and the Chronicon Paschale. Upon further investigation, it appears that an 18th century theory regarding Ariston's presence in the Chronicon Paschale as the author of a previously unknown Christian Apology is correct. Also, the investigation of the theory demonstrates that previous claims regarding the Chronicon material's reliance upon Ecclesiastical History are incorrect. With these points established, it becomes clear that Ariston can be regarded as the author of a Christian Apology addressed to the Roman Emperor Hadrian, with an internal assigned date during the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 CE). This attribution sheds new light on Ariston of Pella and establishes a more reliable date for his floruit. In addition, it establishes a new Christian Apology from the time of the reign of Emperor Hadrian. It also contributes new information about Eusebius' sources for Ecclesiastical History and further information about Aquila of Pontus, Emperor Hadrian and the Bar Kokhba Revolt.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

In 1964, the remains of a large house were discovered in the Israeli city of Beth-Shean/ Beth-Sha... more In 1964, the remains of a large house were discovered in the Israeli city of Beth-Shean/ Beth-Shan (also known as Scythopolis). Once excavated, the mid-5th century CE house was found to contain many interesting artifacts, but none as fascinating as a large, elaborate mosaic and two inscribed column lintels. The meanings of the words and images found in the mosaic have spawned several theories, but it is our contention that the theories about the inscriptions in the mosaic must be viewed in light of an intriguing inscription found on one of the column lintels. Unfortunately, of the two major studies published since the initial publication of the house's discovery, neither attempts to address the column lintels. The current article seeks to rectify this situation and reexamines the previous theories and the mosaic inscriptions in light of the inscription from one of the column lintels. The result is a series of conclusions that, it is hoped, help to clarify certain important points regarding the House of Leontis Kloubas.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Biocentrism –the opinion that non-human life and human life have a similar value—is not especiall... more Biocentrism –the opinion that non-human life and human life have a similar value—is not especially difficult to rationalize. However, it is an opinion that comes with a great deal of preconceived notions attached to it, especially regarding the opinions of any philosopher who attempts to demonstrate how Biocentrism can actually be introduced into human society. The following paper explores how Biocentrism initially had a difficult time being taken seriously outside of pro-Biocentric circles. It also demonstrates how Biocentric philosophers were routinely labeled " radicals " for simply attempting to argue in favor of Biocentrism.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact