Jean-baptiste Rauzy - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Jean-baptiste Rauzy

Pour rendre compte de la theorie leibnizienne de la verite, l'auteur a choisi de proceder de ... more Pour rendre compte de la theorie leibnizienne de la verite, l'auteur a choisi de proceder de maniere genealogique. La genealogie est d'abord effectuee dans l'oeuvre elle-meme. Pour chaque these abordee, y compris pour les plus connues, on a cherche a etablir les principaux moments de sa formation, en remontant aux textes de jeunesse pertinents. Mais la methode genealogique a ete aussi employee de maniere externe : les fragments leibniziens sont confrontes a des textes plus anciens et le sens des concepts fondamentaux est eclaire par l'heritage de la scolastique ancienne et tardive. Par sa methode, ce travail est le premier en son genre consacre a la logique de leibniz dans son entier : il prolonge et elargit la perspective ouverte par le professeur massimo mugnai a partir de la logique des relations. Les theses defendues peuvent etre resumees de la maniere suivante : 1) leibniz defend une conception conceptualiste par ce qui se trouve thematise comme "restrictio...

Jean-Baptiste Rauzy, maitre de conferences a l’Universite Aix-Marseille-I Compte rendu non commun... more Jean-Baptiste Rauzy, maitre de conferences a l’Universite Aix-Marseille-I Compte rendu non communique

Traduction collective, realisee a l'Universite de Provence par les membres du GRAPPHIC et coo... more Traduction collective, realisee a l'Universite de Provence par les membres du GRAPPHIC et coordonnee par Jean-Baptise Rauzy

Jean-Baptiste Rauzy, maitre de conferences a l’Universite Aix-Marseille-I/Provence Compte rendu n... more Jean-Baptiste Rauzy, maitre de conferences a l’Universite Aix-Marseille-I/Provence Compte rendu non communique

Les Études philosophiques

I Garber in Context. A general and simplified overview of the way commentaries2 of Leibniz's... more I Garber in Context. A general and simplified overview of the way commentaries2 of Leibniz's metaphysics have evolved over the past twenty years or so can be given by observing that we have moved successively through two different frameworks. The first framework concentrated above all on Leibniz's nominalism and can be traced back to Benson Mates's book published in 1986. The second framework insisted rather on Leibniz's idealism, starting from Robert M. Adams's book which came out in 1994. This is not to ...

Les Études philosophiques

Leibniz Society Review, 2002

Phenomenological Realism and Dialectical Ontology, 2009

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2005

Les Études philosophiques

Leibniz Society Review, 2002

Phenomenological Realism and Dialectical Ontology, 2009

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2005

Rauzy, Jean-Baptiste. ‘Leibniz on the Frege Point’. JOLMA no. 2 (15 December 2021). doi:10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2021/02/003., 2021

In the debate on the Frege Point, the 'Spinoza thesis' is often mentioned. But Leibniz is kept ou... more In the debate on the Frege Point, the 'Spinoza thesis' is often mentioned. But Leibniz is kept out. Yet, on this topic, Spinoza and Leibniz shared a fairly similar goal. They sought to root the assertive force in the conceptual activity of the subject. But Leibniz, unlike Spinoza, wanted also to build a coherent theory of propositions. Propositions are for him always provided with assertive force. But what is affirmed by the propositions of logic is only a possibility-the possibility of the conceptual link they express. Stronger assertions require something more: a mark of actuality, a modal symbol in logic or the use of notae or particulae which belong to natural languages. Leibniz does not modify his conception of propositions in his "analysis particularum". He tries to understand what we do when we use them in various contexts. The Leibnizian proposition is neutral, but it is not forceless. Since it is not forceless, there is no need to appeal to an external act or to a judgment. Leibniz thinks, like most of the authors of the Aristotelian tradition, that the proposition contains the act of judging. Since it is neutral, there is no need to venture into the many difficulties raised by cancellation to account for the force/content relation in the conditional, disjunctive or fictional contexts.