Jelle Baan - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Jelle Baan

Research paper thumbnail of Review of: Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze

Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 2019

In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticu... more In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticulous reconstruction of the logic of Deleuze’s philosophy. It’s a reconstruction, in the sense of a detective-story. Like every good detective Lapoujade knows that personal or emotional considerations are of little importance in investigating. That’s why he does not rely on descriptions of his ‘lived experience’ or personal anecdotes about his former master and friend. For detection ought to be, as Sherlock Holmes once stated, an exact science. It’s from logical reasoning alone then that he tries to come up with an answer to the question that haunts every detective: ‘what happened?’ (79).

Research paper thumbnail of For Felicitas

Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy

Research paper thumbnail of For Felicitas

For Felicitas (Krisis Issue commemorating 70 years Minima Moralia), 2022

Book Reviews by Jelle Baan

Research paper thumbnail of Review of D. Lapoujade's 'Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze', an empirico-transcendental deduction

Baan, J. (2019). Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 40(1), 227-230., 2019

In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticu... more In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticulous reconstruction of the logic of Deleuze's philosophy. It's a reconstruction, in the sense of a detective-story. Like every good detective Lapoujade knows that personal or emotional considerations are of little importance in investigating. That's why he does not rely on descriptions of his 'lived experience' or personal anecdotes about his former master and friend. For detection ought to be, as Sherlock Holmes once stated, an exact science. It’s from logical reasoning alone then that he tries to come up with an answer to the question that haunts every detective: ‘what happened?’

Research paper thumbnail of Review of: Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze

Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 2019

In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticu... more In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticulous reconstruction of the logic of Deleuze’s philosophy. It’s a reconstruction, in the sense of a detective-story. Like every good detective Lapoujade knows that personal or emotional considerations are of little importance in investigating. That’s why he does not rely on descriptions of his ‘lived experience’ or personal anecdotes about his former master and friend. For detection ought to be, as Sherlock Holmes once stated, an exact science. It’s from logical reasoning alone then that he tries to come up with an answer to the question that haunts every detective: ‘what happened?’ (79).

Research paper thumbnail of For Felicitas

Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy

Research paper thumbnail of For Felicitas

For Felicitas (Krisis Issue commemorating 70 years Minima Moralia), 2022

Research paper thumbnail of Review of D. Lapoujade's 'Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze', an empirico-transcendental deduction

Baan, J. (2019). Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 40(1), 227-230., 2019

In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticu... more In Aberrant Movements. The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze David Lapoujade presents us with a meticulous reconstruction of the logic of Deleuze's philosophy. It's a reconstruction, in the sense of a detective-story. Like every good detective Lapoujade knows that personal or emotional considerations are of little importance in investigating. That's why he does not rely on descriptions of his 'lived experience' or personal anecdotes about his former master and friend. For detection ought to be, as Sherlock Holmes once stated, an exact science. It’s from logical reasoning alone then that he tries to come up with an answer to the question that haunts every detective: ‘what happened?’

Log In