Jennifer Hendriks - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Jennifer Hendriks

Research paper thumbnail of 105. English in Contact: German and Dutch

Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 34.2, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of Prenominal possessor doubling constructions in (West) Germanic: reassessing the evidence for grammaticalisation

Research paper thumbnail of Migration and linguistic change in early modern Holland: The case of Leiden

Research paper thumbnail of Taalgebruik in woelige tijden: Het belang van egodocumenten in het archief van de Bibliotheca Thysiana (Language change in turbulent times. The importance of egodocuments in the Bibliotheca Thysiana archive)

Research paper thumbnail of English in Contact: German and Dutch

Research paper thumbnail of The effects of complex migration trajectories on individual linguistic repertoires in the early modern dutch urban context

Research paper thumbnail of Grammatical change : theory and description

Research paper thumbnail of On the use and abuse of social history in the history of the Dutch language

Research paper thumbnail of Case marking (accounts) in collapse:Evidence from Early Modern Dutch egodocuments (1570-1630)

Als2011 Australian Linguistics Society Annual Conference Conference Proceedings, Jul 25, 2011

Research paper thumbnail of Re-examining the ‘origins’ of the prenominal periphrastic possessive construction Jan z’n boek in Dutch: An empirical approach

Diachronica, 2012

The dative reanalysis ‘origins’ explanation for prenominal periphrastic possessive constructions ... more The dative reanalysis ‘origins’ explanation for prenominal periphrastic possessive constructions (PPPCs) in Dutch has been maintained for well over a century. This paper brings new evidence to bear on this hypothesis, arguing that while genitive relational case marking on the possessor NP in earlier Dutch PPPCs is clearly attested, we lack evidence that the dative was used in this way. Instead, two types of case marking strategies are in use in earlier Dutch PPPCs — one relational and one concordial — as a solution to case conflict in instances which would otherwise give rise to double case marking. Historical and present-day dialect data from German is also examined to address the common assumption that developments in Dutch PPPCs mirrored those in German. Similar to Dutch, clear evidence attests to genitive relational case marking in earlier German PPPCs.

Research paper thumbnail of Agreement and Animacy in 'Auxiliary Pronoun Possessives' in Middle and Early Modern Dutch1

Research paper thumbnail of 105. English in Contact: German and Dutch

Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 34.2, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of Prenominal possessor doubling constructions in (West) Germanic: reassessing the evidence for grammaticalisation

Research paper thumbnail of Migration and linguistic change in early modern Holland: The case of Leiden

Research paper thumbnail of Taalgebruik in woelige tijden: Het belang van egodocumenten in het archief van de Bibliotheca Thysiana (Language change in turbulent times. The importance of egodocuments in the Bibliotheca Thysiana archive)

Research paper thumbnail of English in Contact: German and Dutch

Research paper thumbnail of The effects of complex migration trajectories on individual linguistic repertoires in the early modern dutch urban context

Research paper thumbnail of Grammatical change : theory and description

Research paper thumbnail of On the use and abuse of social history in the history of the Dutch language

Research paper thumbnail of Case marking (accounts) in collapse:Evidence from Early Modern Dutch egodocuments (1570-1630)

Als2011 Australian Linguistics Society Annual Conference Conference Proceedings, Jul 25, 2011

Research paper thumbnail of Re-examining the ‘origins’ of the prenominal periphrastic possessive construction Jan z’n boek in Dutch: An empirical approach

Diachronica, 2012

The dative reanalysis ‘origins’ explanation for prenominal periphrastic possessive constructions ... more The dative reanalysis ‘origins’ explanation for prenominal periphrastic possessive constructions (PPPCs) in Dutch has been maintained for well over a century. This paper brings new evidence to bear on this hypothesis, arguing that while genitive relational case marking on the possessor NP in earlier Dutch PPPCs is clearly attested, we lack evidence that the dative was used in this way. Instead, two types of case marking strategies are in use in earlier Dutch PPPCs — one relational and one concordial — as a solution to case conflict in instances which would otherwise give rise to double case marking. Historical and present-day dialect data from German is also examined to address the common assumption that developments in Dutch PPPCs mirrored those in German. Similar to Dutch, clear evidence attests to genitive relational case marking in earlier German PPPCs.

Research paper thumbnail of Agreement and Animacy in 'Auxiliary Pronoun Possessives' in Middle and Early Modern Dutch1