Jorge Salazar - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Jorge Salazar

Journal of composite Materials, 1983

This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by ... more This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by the American Helicopter Society, March 1983 l_i_)er presents results of a study on the energy absorption characteristics of selected composite material systems and compares the results with aluminum. Composite compression tube specimens were fabricated with both tape and woven fabric prepreg using graphite/epoxy (Gr/E), Kevlar (_H /epoxy (K/E) and glass/epoxy (GI/E). Chamfering and notching one end of the composite tube specimen reduced the peak load at initial failure without altering the sustained crushing load. and prevented catastrophic failure. Static compression and vertical impact tests were performed on 128 tubes. The results varied significant]y as a function of material type and ply orientation. In general, the Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the GI/E or K/E tubes for the same ply orientation. The [0/_15] Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the aluminum tubes. Gr/E and GI/E tubes failed in a brittle mode and had negligible post crushing integrity, whereas the K/E tubes failed in an accord.ian buckling mode similar to the aluminum tubes. The energy absorption and post crushing integrity of hybrid composite tubes were not significantly y better than that of the single material tubes.

Journal of composite Materials, 1983

This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by ... more This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by the American Helicopter Society, March 1983 l_i_)er presents results of a study on the energy absorption characteristics of selected composite material systems and compares the results with aluminum. Composite compression tube specimens were fabricated with both tape and woven fabric prepreg using graphite/epoxy (Gr/E), Kevlar (_H /epoxy (K/E) and glass/epoxy (GI/E). Chamfering and notching one end of the composite tube specimen reduced the peak load at initial failure without altering the sustained crushing load. and prevented catastrophic failure. Static compression and vertical impact tests were performed on 128 tubes. The results varied significant]y as a function of material type and ply orientation. In general, the Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the GI/E or K/E tubes for the same ply orientation. The [0/_15] Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the aluminum tubes. Gr/E and GI/E tubes failed in a brittle mode and had negligible post crushing integrity, whereas the K/E tubes failed in an accord.ian buckling mode similar to the aluminum tubes. The energy absorption and post crushing integrity of hybrid composite tubes were not significantly y better than that of the single material tubes.

Journal of composite Materials, 1983

This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by ... more This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by the American Helicopter Society, March 1983 l_i_)er presents results of a study on the energy absorption characteristics of selected composite material systems and compares the results with aluminum. Composite compression tube specimens were fabricated with both tape and woven fabric prepreg using graphite/epoxy (Gr/E), Kevlar (_H /epoxy (K/E) and glass/epoxy (GI/E). Chamfering and notching one end of the composite tube specimen reduced the peak load at initial failure without altering the sustained crushing load. and prevented catastrophic failure. Static compression and vertical impact tests were performed on 128 tubes. The results varied significant]y as a function of material type and ply orientation. In general, the Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the GI/E or K/E tubes for the same ply orientation. The [0/_15] Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the aluminum tubes. Gr/E and GI/E tubes failed in a brittle mode and had negligible post crushing integrity, whereas the K/E tubes failed in an accord.ian buckling mode similar to the aluminum tubes. The energy absorption and post crushing integrity of hybrid composite tubes were not significantly y better than that of the single material tubes.

Journal of composite Materials, 1983

This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by ... more This paper was presented at the National Specialists' Meeting-Composite Structures, sponsored by the American Helicopter Society, March 1983 l_i_)er presents results of a study on the energy absorption characteristics of selected composite material systems and compares the results with aluminum. Composite compression tube specimens were fabricated with both tape and woven fabric prepreg using graphite/epoxy (Gr/E), Kevlar (_H /epoxy (K/E) and glass/epoxy (GI/E). Chamfering and notching one end of the composite tube specimen reduced the peak load at initial failure without altering the sustained crushing load. and prevented catastrophic failure. Static compression and vertical impact tests were performed on 128 tubes. The results varied significant]y as a function of material type and ply orientation. In general, the Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the GI/E or K/E tubes for the same ply orientation. The [0/_15] Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the aluminum tubes. Gr/E and GI/E tubes failed in a brittle mode and had negligible post crushing integrity, whereas the K/E tubes failed in an accord.ian buckling mode similar to the aluminum tubes. The energy absorption and post crushing integrity of hybrid composite tubes were not significantly y better than that of the single material tubes.

Log In