Jurriaan Wink - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Maritime Conflict Management in Europe and Beyond by Jurriaan Wink
https://www.hsozkult.de/conferencereport/id/tagungsberichte-8424, 2019
Being a rather marginal topic for a long time, the field of premodern maritime conflict and marit... more Being a rather marginal topic for a long time, the field of premodern maritime conflict and maritime violence has raised the attention of
scholars in the past years. New approaches, influenced from cultural and economic history, have studied the practices of conflict management and the dynamic perception of licit and illicit practices in the maritime realm. As such, these micro-studies of maritime conflict management open new perspectives to understand economic and social structures at
sea and on land and its dynamics in a broader sense. In this context, the conference organized by Louis Sicking (Amsterdam/Leiden)
and Philipp Höhn (Halle) was the final in a series of conferences and workshops, which were part of the NWO funded project „Maritime Conflict Management in Atlantic Europe, 1200–1600“ led by Sicking.
The aim of the conference was to bring together scholars
working on the Baltic and the Atlantic in order to compare and to combine the growing field of conflict management studies with new
approaches focusing on the semantics of maritime violence.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2017.1314605 This article discusses how merchants or skippers ... more http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2017.1314605
This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damages in trading and shipping from or with Holland and Zeeland in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century within the context of Anglo–Dutch trade and diplomacy. In accordance with legal doctrine both the English king and the Count of Holland considered reprisal as an ultimate remedy. Both rulers used the possibility of reprisal as a means of pressure within Anglo–Dutch diplomacy. Their willingness to support their subjects went beyond the issue of damage redress as it also enabled them to have more control over their subjects. When reprisal was eventually issued, rulers on both sides of the Channel carefully supervised and controlled its procedures. Even though rulers were prepared to support victims via diplomacy and, ultimately, reprisal, they did consider individual interests in the functioning of the wider political and economic interests of their countries.
Conferences, Workshops, Talks and Lectures by Jurriaan Wink
Papers by Jurriaan Wink
TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History
Comparative Legal History, 2017
This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damage... more This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damages in trading and shipping from or with Holland and Zeeland in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century within the context of Anglo-Dutch trade and diplomacy. In accordance with legal doctrine both the English king and the Count of Holland considered reprisal as an ultimate remedy. Both rulers used the possibility of reprisal as a means of pressure within Anglo-Dutch diplomacy. Their willingness to support their subjects went beyond the issue of damage redress as it also enabled them to have more control over their subjects. When reprisal was eventually issued, rulers on both sides of the Channel carefully supervised and controlled its procedures. Even though rulers were prepared to support victims via diplomacy and, ultimately, reprisal, they did consider individual interests in the functioning of the wider political and economic interests of their countries.
https://www.hsozkult.de/conferencereport/id/tagungsberichte-8424, 2019
Being a rather marginal topic for a long time, the field of premodern maritime conflict and marit... more Being a rather marginal topic for a long time, the field of premodern maritime conflict and maritime violence has raised the attention of
scholars in the past years. New approaches, influenced from cultural and economic history, have studied the practices of conflict management and the dynamic perception of licit and illicit practices in the maritime realm. As such, these micro-studies of maritime conflict management open new perspectives to understand economic and social structures at
sea and on land and its dynamics in a broader sense. In this context, the conference organized by Louis Sicking (Amsterdam/Leiden)
and Philipp Höhn (Halle) was the final in a series of conferences and workshops, which were part of the NWO funded project „Maritime Conflict Management in Atlantic Europe, 1200–1600“ led by Sicking.
The aim of the conference was to bring together scholars
working on the Baltic and the Atlantic in order to compare and to combine the growing field of conflict management studies with new
approaches focusing on the semantics of maritime violence.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2017.1314605 This article discusses how merchants or skippers ... more http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2017.1314605
This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damages in trading and shipping from or with Holland and Zeeland in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century within the context of Anglo–Dutch trade and diplomacy. In accordance with legal doctrine both the English king and the Count of Holland considered reprisal as an ultimate remedy. Both rulers used the possibility of reprisal as a means of pressure within Anglo–Dutch diplomacy. Their willingness to support their subjects went beyond the issue of damage redress as it also enabled them to have more control over their subjects. When reprisal was eventually issued, rulers on both sides of the Channel carefully supervised and controlled its procedures. Even though rulers were prepared to support victims via diplomacy and, ultimately, reprisal, they did consider individual interests in the functioning of the wider political and economic interests of their countries.
TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History
Comparative Legal History, 2017
This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damage... more This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damages in trading and shipping from or with Holland and Zeeland in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century within the context of Anglo-Dutch trade and diplomacy. In accordance with legal doctrine both the English king and the Count of Holland considered reprisal as an ultimate remedy. Both rulers used the possibility of reprisal as a means of pressure within Anglo-Dutch diplomacy. Their willingness to support their subjects went beyond the issue of damage redress as it also enabled them to have more control over their subjects. When reprisal was eventually issued, rulers on both sides of the Channel carefully supervised and controlled its procedures. Even though rulers were prepared to support victims via diplomacy and, ultimately, reprisal, they did consider individual interests in the functioning of the wider political and economic interests of their countries.