Kenneth Shields - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Kenneth Shields
Indogermanische Forschungen, 1996
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, May 15, 2013
On the basis of formal correspondences and typological data, it is argued in this brief paper tha... more On the basis of formal correspondences and typological data, it is argued in this brief paper that an etymological connection probably exists between the Indo-European dative suffix *-ei and the Indo-European causative element *-ei- via a morpheme which Song (1996) describes as “PURP.” Most significantly, the paper demonstrates how typological data can serve a primary role in reconstruction rather than a merely evaluative one
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lingua Posnaniensis, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1999
On the basis of research previously published by the author, this article explores the origin of ... more On the basis of research previously published by the author, this article explores the origin of the so-called bare stem enclitic accusative personal pronouns of Indo-European, especially the second person singular form in * te. It is proposed that a zero grade first person singular stem in * m- with an affixed objective marker in * -e served as the basis for a reanalysis of the second person singular stem in * te- as zero-grade * t- + affix * -e
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Diachronica, 1986
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Orbis, 1994
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2001
Dans le cadre de la linguistique comparative indo-europeenne, l'hypothese nostratique et la n... more Dans le cadre de la linguistique comparative indo-europeenne, l'hypothese nostratique et la nouvelle image (Adrados, 1992) de la morphologie indo-europeenne suscitent un interet grandissant. Selon la Theorie Nostratique, le proto-indo-europeen n'est pas une langue genetiquement isolee, mais liee a certaines familles de langues de l'Eurasie centrale et du Nord, du sous-continent indien et de l'ancien Proche-Orient. Selon les tenants de la nouvelle image de la morphologie indo-europeenne, ce n'est pas un, mais trois types d'indo-europeens qui sont a reconstruire. L'A. souligne l'importance des correspondances grammaticales dans la validation des differentes methodes de reconstruction utilisees dans ce champ de recherche
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici, 2003
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Linguistica, Dec 29, 2010
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Indogermanische Forschungen, Dec 31, 2000
Hittite presents numerous etymological problems to the field of comparative Indo-European linguis... more Hittite presents numerous etymological problems to the field of comparative Indo-European linguistics. Among the most difficult Hittite lexical items to assess etymologically "are those items where sumerograms tease us with an unpleasant version of hide-and-seek" (Puhvel 1992: 264). Although derivative forms in syllabic script and full attestations in minor dialects of Anatolian often shed light on the formal properties of these words, some lexical items remain largely inaccessible because of their logographic rendering. One such item is the word for 'son' (and 'male child') DUMU.DUMU-&? (nom.) or DUMU-/0— the latter providing a tantalizing clue regarding its final syllable. Since Hittite 'son' appears quite removed from the *sunu(e.g., Skt. sunu-, Go. sunus) "etymologically related to the [Indo-European Proper] root *seuH-l*suH'give birth; cf. Skt. sute 'gives birth', suta'son; born', Avest. hav'give birth' (the IndoEuropean [Proper] word for 'son' is formed from this root by suffixation of *-nor the thematic vowel..." [Gamkrelidze & Ivanov 1995: 667-668]) and from such forms as Lycian tideimi ("a transparent Luwian *f/ta//m-'sucking' not very unlike Latin filius" [Puhvel 1992: 264]), Melchert (1980) uses the phonological glimpse provided by the phonetic complement of DUMU-/0and his "hypothesis that the spelling nu-uz-za ['conjunction plus reflexive particle'] was conditioned by a following vowel" (1980: 92) to identify the form of the word as ayawala-, "which occurs in the 'Tawagalawa Letter', KUB.XIV 3 I 6-12" with, in his view, the appropriate meaning. He goes on to maintain that there is "no compelling reason to assume that the word [ayawala-] is Indo-European at all", although he prefers to see the element -/aas Hittite. In support of the non-IndoEuropean origins of the word, Melchert (1980: 95) argues that the Hittite term of relationship nega'sister similarly lacks cognates in Indo-European Proper. Despite a failure to justify his assertion in detail, Puhvel (1992: 264) observes that "Melchert's ayawala(1980: 90-95) hardly fills the bill" as an explanation and proceeds to characterize the Hittite form simply as an "obscure innova-
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1998
This brief paper explores the origin of the reflexive stems *se-, *s(e)we- traditionally reconstr... more This brief paper explores the origin of the reflexive stems *se-, *s(e)we- traditionally reconstructed for Indo-European. It is argued that a demonstrative in *(e/o)s- underlies the reflexive elements *se- and *s- and that *-we- can be derived from an ancient Indo-European indirect speech marker which was affixed to the demonstrative as a means of formally differentiating the true reflexive and logophoric functions. Both comparative and typological evidence is used to support this theory
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Linguistica, Dec 1, 1979
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Folia Linguistica Historica, 1994
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, Mar 11, 2015
In this brief paper it is proposed, on the basis of formal and typological evidence, that the Ind... more In this brief paper it is proposed, on the basis of formal and typological evidence, that the Indo-European pronominal stem *ei may be related etymologically to the root *ei- ‘go.’
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution, Oct 1, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Historische Sprachforschung, 1998
L'A. tente d'expliquer l'origine de la racine pronominale hittite u- marquant la prem... more L'A. tente d'expliquer l'origine de la racine pronominale hittite u- marquant la premiere personne du singulier, en se basant sur sa reconstruction du systeme original des pronoms personnels indo-europeen. Il fournit ainsi une description de l'evolution typologique de ce systeme et souleve certaines questions concernant les etymologies traditionnelles de la premiere personne du pluriel et du duel en germanique
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Speech, 1989
... REFERENCES Atwood, E. Bagby. 1950. "Grease and Greasy: A Study of Geographical Variation... more ... REFERENCES Atwood, E. Bagby. 1950. "Grease and Greasy: A Study of Geographical Variation." University of Texas Studies in English 29: 249-60. Rpt. ... New York: Holt, 1971. 424-33. . 1962. The Regional Vocabulary of Texas. Austin: U of Texas P. Duckert, Audrey. 1963. ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Indogermanische Forschungen, 1996
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, May 15, 2013
On the basis of formal correspondences and typological data, it is argued in this brief paper tha... more On the basis of formal correspondences and typological data, it is argued in this brief paper that an etymological connection probably exists between the Indo-European dative suffix *-ei and the Indo-European causative element *-ei- via a morpheme which Song (1996) describes as “PURP.” Most significantly, the paper demonstrates how typological data can serve a primary role in reconstruction rather than a merely evaluative one
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lingua Posnaniensis, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1999
On the basis of research previously published by the author, this article explores the origin of ... more On the basis of research previously published by the author, this article explores the origin of the so-called bare stem enclitic accusative personal pronouns of Indo-European, especially the second person singular form in * te. It is proposed that a zero grade first person singular stem in * m- with an affixed objective marker in * -e served as the basis for a reanalysis of the second person singular stem in * te- as zero-grade * t- + affix * -e
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Diachronica, 1986
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Orbis, 1994
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2001
Dans le cadre de la linguistique comparative indo-europeenne, l'hypothese nostratique et la n... more Dans le cadre de la linguistique comparative indo-europeenne, l'hypothese nostratique et la nouvelle image (Adrados, 1992) de la morphologie indo-europeenne suscitent un interet grandissant. Selon la Theorie Nostratique, le proto-indo-europeen n'est pas une langue genetiquement isolee, mais liee a certaines familles de langues de l'Eurasie centrale et du Nord, du sous-continent indien et de l'ancien Proche-Orient. Selon les tenants de la nouvelle image de la morphologie indo-europeenne, ce n'est pas un, mais trois types d'indo-europeens qui sont a reconstruire. L'A. souligne l'importance des correspondances grammaticales dans la validation des differentes methodes de reconstruction utilisees dans ce champ de recherche
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici, 2003
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Linguistica, Dec 29, 2010
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Indogermanische Forschungen, Dec 31, 2000
Hittite presents numerous etymological problems to the field of comparative Indo-European linguis... more Hittite presents numerous etymological problems to the field of comparative Indo-European linguistics. Among the most difficult Hittite lexical items to assess etymologically "are those items where sumerograms tease us with an unpleasant version of hide-and-seek" (Puhvel 1992: 264). Although derivative forms in syllabic script and full attestations in minor dialects of Anatolian often shed light on the formal properties of these words, some lexical items remain largely inaccessible because of their logographic rendering. One such item is the word for 'son' (and 'male child') DUMU.DUMU-&? (nom.) or DUMU-/0— the latter providing a tantalizing clue regarding its final syllable. Since Hittite 'son' appears quite removed from the *sunu(e.g., Skt. sunu-, Go. sunus) "etymologically related to the [Indo-European Proper] root *seuH-l*suH'give birth; cf. Skt. sute 'gives birth', suta'son; born', Avest. hav'give birth' (the IndoEuropean [Proper] word for 'son' is formed from this root by suffixation of *-nor the thematic vowel..." [Gamkrelidze & Ivanov 1995: 667-668]) and from such forms as Lycian tideimi ("a transparent Luwian *f/ta//m-'sucking' not very unlike Latin filius" [Puhvel 1992: 264]), Melchert (1980) uses the phonological glimpse provided by the phonetic complement of DUMU-/0and his "hypothesis that the spelling nu-uz-za ['conjunction plus reflexive particle'] was conditioned by a following vowel" (1980: 92) to identify the form of the word as ayawala-, "which occurs in the 'Tawagalawa Letter', KUB.XIV 3 I 6-12" with, in his view, the appropriate meaning. He goes on to maintain that there is "no compelling reason to assume that the word [ayawala-] is Indo-European at all", although he prefers to see the element -/aas Hittite. In support of the non-IndoEuropean origins of the word, Melchert (1980: 95) argues that the Hittite term of relationship nega'sister similarly lacks cognates in Indo-European Proper. Despite a failure to justify his assertion in detail, Puhvel (1992: 264) observes that "Melchert's ayawala(1980: 90-95) hardly fills the bill" as an explanation and proceeds to characterize the Hittite form simply as an "obscure innova-
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1998
This brief paper explores the origin of the reflexive stems *se-, *s(e)we- traditionally reconstr... more This brief paper explores the origin of the reflexive stems *se-, *s(e)we- traditionally reconstructed for Indo-European. It is argued that a demonstrative in *(e/o)s- underlies the reflexive elements *se- and *s- and that *-we- can be derived from an ancient Indo-European indirect speech marker which was affixed to the demonstrative as a means of formally differentiating the true reflexive and logophoric functions. Both comparative and typological evidence is used to support this theory
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Linguistica, Dec 1, 1979
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Folia Linguistica Historica, 1994
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, Mar 11, 2015
In this brief paper it is proposed, on the basis of formal and typological evidence, that the Ind... more In this brief paper it is proposed, on the basis of formal and typological evidence, that the Indo-European pronominal stem *ei may be related etymologically to the root *ei- ‘go.’
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution, Oct 1, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Historische Sprachforschung, 1998
L'A. tente d'expliquer l'origine de la racine pronominale hittite u- marquant la prem... more L'A. tente d'expliquer l'origine de la racine pronominale hittite u- marquant la premiere personne du singulier, en se basant sur sa reconstruction du systeme original des pronoms personnels indo-europeen. Il fournit ainsi une description de l'evolution typologique de ce systeme et souleve certaines questions concernant les etymologies traditionnelles de la premiere personne du pluriel et du duel en germanique
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Speech, 1989
... REFERENCES Atwood, E. Bagby. 1950. "Grease and Greasy: A Study of Geographical Variation... more ... REFERENCES Atwood, E. Bagby. 1950. "Grease and Greasy: A Study of Geographical Variation." University of Texas Studies in English 29: 249-60. Rpt. ... New York: Holt, 1971. 424-33. . 1962. The Regional Vocabulary of Texas. Austin: U of Texas P. Duckert, Audrey. 1963. ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact