Lorenzo Vinciguerra - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Lorenzo Vinciguerra
RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA, 2010
God’s gesture. Nature and the origin of the sign in Spinoza. The Author provides the textual and ... more God’s gesture. Nature and the origin of the sign in Spinoza. The Author provides the textual and conceptual elements to outline a thought of event in Spinoza’s philosophy. On the one hand necessitas and contingentia are known to exclude one another while, on the other, necessitas and contingere are not opposite. They are the same when seen in relation to the conception of libera necessitas and to the doctrine of the unity of intellect and will. Also, the unity of a thought of concept and a thought of event appears in the definition of revelation, where the problem of the sign becomes crucial in separating philosophy from theology. A comparative study of the texts confirms the influence of Stoicism on the triadic model of the sign, showing that all interpreters give a pragmatic orientation to the sense of signs. The impossibility for any sign to be signum sui is not due to a defect in its nature. The idea of God, in fact, does not itself need any sign to be known, but it is also true that there is no lack of a sign for its linguistic communication.
L'Homme, 2009
Assuming spinozism as a radical critique of the Western tradition, the article points out three g... more Assuming spinozism as a radical critique of the Western tradition, the article points out three general theses to be considered as prolegomena to any scientific approach to man. According to the spinozistic negation of substantial individuals, the universal essence of man is thought as constituted by three fundamental relations: ontological, cosmological and sociological.
Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy, 2019
This article looks back over Spinoza's philosophical corpus and shows how Nadler's readin... more This article looks back over Spinoza's philosophical corpus and shows how Nadler's reading better suits the big picture of the evolution of Spinoza's thought. He also looks to show how the French literature similar interpretations have been defended, and this says about the relation between American and French Spinoza scholarship. Lastly, he raises an important issue for measuring the meaningfulness for that which is bad and evil in Spinoza's philosophy, namely, wether, for Spinoza, it is knowable to the same degree as that which is good
Jean Jamin, directeur d’etudesFrancois Flahault, directeur de recherche au CNRSLorenzo Vinciguerr... more Jean Jamin, directeur d’etudesFrancois Flahault, directeur de recherche au CNRSLorenzo Vinciguerra, maitre de conferences a l’Universite de Reims Anthropologie generale et philosophie En reponse a la specialisation croissante des sciences humaines et de la philosophie en tant que discipline universitaire, le seminaire entend mener une reflexion philosophique prenant appui sur les sciences empiriques de l’homme. Dans cette perspective, l’expose de Marc Auge a trace une typologie anthropologiqu...
Ligeia, 2007
Titre du fascicule : Art et Espace / Milovan Stanic (dir.
Ligeia, 2009
Titre du fascicule : Art abstraction : forme, objet, chose. Théories artistiques, linguistique et... more Titre du fascicule : Art abstraction : forme, objet, chose. Théories artistiques, linguistique et philosophie / Nadia Podzemskaia (dir.
Galáxia (São Paulo), 2017
Resumo Ao invés de ler a teoria da imaginação de Espinoza de maneira antropocêntrica, como depend... more Resumo Ao invés de ler a teoria da imaginação de Espinoza de maneira antropocêntrica, como dependente da doutrina tradicional das faculdades humanas, o autor a considera como uma consequência de sua física e de sua cosmologia. O conhecimento por signos, como Espinoza chama a imaginação, deve estar enraizado em sua teoria das marcas e imagens, e diz respeito a todos os seres (humanos e não humanos) que são capazes de marcar outros corpos e de serem marcados por eles numa semiose infinita da natureza.
L Homme, 2009
© École des hautes études en sciences sociales 8 Lorenzo Vinciguerra 3. Spinoza était le premier ... more © École des hautes études en sciences sociales 8 Lorenzo Vinciguerra 3. Spinoza était le premier conscient qu'il ne fallait pas mettre ses écrits entre toutes les mains ; il lui arrive même d'en déconseiller la lecture à tous ceux qui ne seraient pas près à faire preuve d'une assez grande liberté de pensée (cf. la préface du Traité théologico-politique). Je cite les textes de Spinoza à partir de la traduction par Charles Appuhn (OEuvres, Paris, Flammarion, 1964, 4 vol.) me réservant le droit de l'amender si nécessaire. 4. Cet article reprend le contenu d'une conférence prononcée le 23 mars 2007 à l'Ehess, à l'invitation de François Flahault et de Jean Jamin dans le cadre de leur séminaire Anthropologie générale et philosophie. Je les remercie ici de leurs remarques et suggestions. 5. Cela a déjà été fait remarquer avant moi : cf.
Isonomia Rivista Di Storia Della Filososofia Dell Universita Di Urbino, 2008
The necessity, the immanence and the antifinalism of substance are the instruments of a radical a... more The necessity, the immanence and the antifinalism of substance are the instruments of a radical anthropological thought in Spinoza, where the theological anthropomorphism appears to be ruled by a finalist anthropocentrism. The theological reform goes together with a anthropological reform, which denounces three native illusions (belief in freedom, in a substantial self and in the power of a free will). In a positive way, man, defined by Spinoza as individuum is to be considered as the effect of a triple natural relation: to the substance, to the universe and to other men (multitudo). The desire, that is the very essence of man, is here conceived as a reaction to these three fundamental and modal relations.
Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia, 1996
Le Nouvel Observateur, 2009
Titre du fascicule : Spinoza : le maître de libert
Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia, 2009
RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA, 2010
God’s gesture. Nature and the origin of the sign in Spinoza. The Author provides the textual and ... more God’s gesture. Nature and the origin of the sign in Spinoza. The Author provides the textual and conceptual elements to outline a thought of event in Spinoza’s philosophy. On the one hand necessitas and contingentia are known to exclude one another while, on the other, necessitas and contingere are not opposite. They are the same when seen in relation to the conception of libera necessitas and to the doctrine of the unity of intellect and will. Also, the unity of a thought of concept and a thought of event appears in the definition of revelation, where the problem of the sign becomes crucial in separating philosophy from theology. A comparative study of the texts confirms the influence of Stoicism on the triadic model of the sign, showing that all interpreters give a pragmatic orientation to the sense of signs. The impossibility for any sign to be signum sui is not due to a defect in its nature. The idea of God, in fact, does not itself need any sign to be known, but it is also true that there is no lack of a sign for its linguistic communication.
L'Homme, 2009
Assuming spinozism as a radical critique of the Western tradition, the article points out three g... more Assuming spinozism as a radical critique of the Western tradition, the article points out three general theses to be considered as prolegomena to any scientific approach to man. According to the spinozistic negation of substantial individuals, the universal essence of man is thought as constituted by three fundamental relations: ontological, cosmological and sociological.
Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy, 2019
This article looks back over Spinoza's philosophical corpus and shows how Nadler's readin... more This article looks back over Spinoza's philosophical corpus and shows how Nadler's reading better suits the big picture of the evolution of Spinoza's thought. He also looks to show how the French literature similar interpretations have been defended, and this says about the relation between American and French Spinoza scholarship. Lastly, he raises an important issue for measuring the meaningfulness for that which is bad and evil in Spinoza's philosophy, namely, wether, for Spinoza, it is knowable to the same degree as that which is good
Jean Jamin, directeur d’etudesFrancois Flahault, directeur de recherche au CNRSLorenzo Vinciguerr... more Jean Jamin, directeur d’etudesFrancois Flahault, directeur de recherche au CNRSLorenzo Vinciguerra, maitre de conferences a l’Universite de Reims Anthropologie generale et philosophie En reponse a la specialisation croissante des sciences humaines et de la philosophie en tant que discipline universitaire, le seminaire entend mener une reflexion philosophique prenant appui sur les sciences empiriques de l’homme. Dans cette perspective, l’expose de Marc Auge a trace une typologie anthropologiqu...
Ligeia, 2007
Titre du fascicule : Art et Espace / Milovan Stanic (dir.
Ligeia, 2009
Titre du fascicule : Art abstraction : forme, objet, chose. Théories artistiques, linguistique et... more Titre du fascicule : Art abstraction : forme, objet, chose. Théories artistiques, linguistique et philosophie / Nadia Podzemskaia (dir.
Galáxia (São Paulo), 2017
Resumo Ao invés de ler a teoria da imaginação de Espinoza de maneira antropocêntrica, como depend... more Resumo Ao invés de ler a teoria da imaginação de Espinoza de maneira antropocêntrica, como dependente da doutrina tradicional das faculdades humanas, o autor a considera como uma consequência de sua física e de sua cosmologia. O conhecimento por signos, como Espinoza chama a imaginação, deve estar enraizado em sua teoria das marcas e imagens, e diz respeito a todos os seres (humanos e não humanos) que são capazes de marcar outros corpos e de serem marcados por eles numa semiose infinita da natureza.
L Homme, 2009
© École des hautes études en sciences sociales 8 Lorenzo Vinciguerra 3. Spinoza était le premier ... more © École des hautes études en sciences sociales 8 Lorenzo Vinciguerra 3. Spinoza était le premier conscient qu'il ne fallait pas mettre ses écrits entre toutes les mains ; il lui arrive même d'en déconseiller la lecture à tous ceux qui ne seraient pas près à faire preuve d'une assez grande liberté de pensée (cf. la préface du Traité théologico-politique). Je cite les textes de Spinoza à partir de la traduction par Charles Appuhn (OEuvres, Paris, Flammarion, 1964, 4 vol.) me réservant le droit de l'amender si nécessaire. 4. Cet article reprend le contenu d'une conférence prononcée le 23 mars 2007 à l'Ehess, à l'invitation de François Flahault et de Jean Jamin dans le cadre de leur séminaire Anthropologie générale et philosophie. Je les remercie ici de leurs remarques et suggestions. 5. Cela a déjà été fait remarquer avant moi : cf.
Isonomia Rivista Di Storia Della Filososofia Dell Universita Di Urbino, 2008
The necessity, the immanence and the antifinalism of substance are the instruments of a radical a... more The necessity, the immanence and the antifinalism of substance are the instruments of a radical anthropological thought in Spinoza, where the theological anthropomorphism appears to be ruled by a finalist anthropocentrism. The theological reform goes together with a anthropological reform, which denounces three native illusions (belief in freedom, in a substantial self and in the power of a free will). In a positive way, man, defined by Spinoza as individuum is to be considered as the effect of a triple natural relation: to the substance, to the universe and to other men (multitudo). The desire, that is the very essence of man, is here conceived as a reaction to these three fundamental and modal relations.
Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia, 1996
Le Nouvel Observateur, 2009
Titre du fascicule : Spinoza : le maître de libert
Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia, 2009