Louise T Bøttkjær - Profile on Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Related Authors
Uploads
Papers by Louise T Bøttkjær
Valg i Sydafrika: Er ANC's dominans slut?
Information-an International Interdisciplinary Journal, Aug 15, 2016
Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice... more Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice, however, corrupt politicians frequently get elected for public office in mass elections. In this paper, we examine how voters respond to corruption allegations against political candidates, and how voter responses may be attenuated by patronage and partisanship. We test these explanations through a survey experiment in South Africa-a country where political corruption is a recurrent issue. We find that voters express strong willingness to punish corrupt candidates. However, voters are more lenient towards corrupt politicians when they are offered work or jobs in return for their vote as part of a clientelist exchange. This effect is amplified for people living in economic hardship. These findings suggest that some types of clientelism serve to reproduce corruption-particularly when poverty is rife-and have important implications for the fight against corruption.
Votes for Sale: Essays on Clientelism in New Democracies
Buying the Votes of the Poor: How the Electoral System Matters
Personality and Political participation: Evidence from South Africa
Vote Markets, Latent Opportunism, and the Secret Ballot
The Journal of Politics, 2021
Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice... more Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice, however, corrupt politicians frequently get elected for public office in mass elections. In this paper, we examine how voters respond to corruption allegations against political candidates, and how voter responses may be attenuated by patronage and partisanship. We test these explanations through a survey experiment in South Africa-a country where political corruption is a recurrent issue. We find that voters express strong willingness to punish corrupt candidates. However, voters are more lenient towards corrupt politicians when they are offered work or jobs in return for their vote as part of a clientelist exchange. This effect is amplified for people living in economic hardship. These findings suggest that some types of clientelism serve to reproduce corruption-particularly when poverty is rife-and have important implications for the fight against corruption.
Valg i Sydafrika: Er ANC's dominans slut?
Information-an International Interdisciplinary Journal, Aug 15, 2016
Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice... more Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice, however, corrupt politicians frequently get elected for public office in mass elections. In this paper, we examine how voters respond to corruption allegations against political candidates, and how voter responses may be attenuated by patronage and partisanship. We test these explanations through a survey experiment in South Africa-a country where political corruption is a recurrent issue. We find that voters express strong willingness to punish corrupt candidates. However, voters are more lenient towards corrupt politicians when they are offered work or jobs in return for their vote as part of a clientelist exchange. This effect is amplified for people living in economic hardship. These findings suggest that some types of clientelism serve to reproduce corruption-particularly when poverty is rife-and have important implications for the fight against corruption.
Votes for Sale: Essays on Clientelism in New Democracies
Buying the Votes of the Poor: How the Electoral System Matters
Personality and Political participation: Evidence from South Africa
Vote Markets, Latent Opportunism, and the Secret Ballot
The Journal of Politics, 2021
Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice... more Democratic elections are supposed to prevent corrupt politicians from winning office. In practice, however, corrupt politicians frequently get elected for public office in mass elections. In this paper, we examine how voters respond to corruption allegations against political candidates, and how voter responses may be attenuated by patronage and partisanship. We test these explanations through a survey experiment in South Africa-a country where political corruption is a recurrent issue. We find that voters express strong willingness to punish corrupt candidates. However, voters are more lenient towards corrupt politicians when they are offered work or jobs in return for their vote as part of a clientelist exchange. This effect is amplified for people living in economic hardship. These findings suggest that some types of clientelism serve to reproduce corruption-particularly when poverty is rife-and have important implications for the fight against corruption.