Massimo Ampola - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Massimo Ampola

A methodological premise on the content of globality: the general order of the society is corpora... more A methodological premise on the content of globality: the general order of the society is corporate by his "net of negotiations," by his discourse/ social exchange; the frame of such negotiations is developed (it is cause and caused) by the technological systems. The net of the social processes is leavened, today, of different forms of "sovereignty", of different contents of the "power" (normal and recurrent phenomenon in the west society with the diffusion of new means of production) that works like control on the interaction macroprocesses/ social negotiations. In this sense there are, among the others, two peculiars considerations: first ,globality,in effect,consists in the diffusion of a technical setting geared to the technological/economic macrosystems; second, this process of ordering bestows on her the structure of general system of the local nets on which she acts. In reality, the apparent inevitability of the macroprocesses, in this technique,suffers of quite a lot necessity of adaptation to the characteristics of the local nets, that see, even, enhanced their capability of interaction using the carriers and the forms of exchange of the same global processes. The problem is all in the substantial difference among local net and local aggregate: an inferring distinction not by a separate observations but only by the social exchange code of the local area,through the capabilities/ abilities that the social actors of the area have to put themselves in conditions of reciprocity, of feedback,of movement respect their personal nets. In substance,to build a local net means to put in order the equilibrium of interaction and exchange of the subjective nets extending the effects of opportunity and development;to govern the local net means "to check,to balance for guarantee" the interaction among his complex and the general processes. Just this function of balancing among local and global delineates the technical passage from government, from the upright intervention, contained and canalized, to the governance, to the coordination of the individual and institutional, public and private processes, coaching collective based actions on the cooperation among the different subjects. Governance in effect, is formatted by the general relations net that includes whether the institutional actions, whether the formalities of interaction among public institutions, private organisms, collective movements, up to the same social actors that, in this process of continual feedback, are constituted like subjects of citizen. The objective content of citizenship, then, is definited by the "ability" of consistence (subjective motivations, shared representations.) that characterize the identity of the subject and by the "capability" of autonomy and movement that he realizes in the own social surrounding (formative capability, techniques, financial.). But there is an other passage:the reality appears us, then, like a system of interactions/ relations, corporate from other nets, his distributions of weights determines the difference among actor and subject. The individual is characterized for a substantial difficulty to govern the complexity of his relations: he possesses all the informative data from his nets, but he is not in degree, alone, to develop the adequate logic to categorize and govern this kit of experiences.

A methodological premise on the content of globality: the general order of the society is corpora... more A methodological premise on the content of globality: the general order of the society is corporate by his "net of negotiations," by his discourse/ social exchange; the frame of such negotiations is developed (it is cause and caused) by the technological systems. The net of the social processes is leavened, today, of different forms of "sovereignty", of different contents of the "power" (normal and recurrent phenomenon in the west society with the diffusion of new means of production) that works like control on the interaction macroprocesses/ social negotiations. In this sense there are, among the others, two peculiars considerations: first ,globality,in effect,consists in the diffusion of a technical setting geared to the technological/economic macrosystems; second, this process of ordering bestows on her the structure of general system of the local nets on which she acts. In reality, the apparent inevitability of the macroprocesses, in this technique,suffers of quite a lot necessity of adaptation to the characteristics of the local nets, that see, even, enhanced their capability of interaction using the carriers and the forms of exchange of the same global processes. The problem is all in the substantial difference among local net and local aggregate: an inferring distinction not by a separate observations but only by the social exchange code of the local area,through the capabilities/ abilities that the social actors of the area have to put themselves in conditions of reciprocity, of feedback,of movement respect their personal nets. In substance,to build a local net means to put in order the equilibrium of interaction and exchange of the subjective nets extending the effects of opportunity and development;to govern the local net means "to check,to balance for guarantee" the interaction among his complex and the general processes. Just this function of balancing among local and global delineates the technical passage from government, from the upright intervention, contained and canalized, to the governance, to the coordination of the individual and institutional, public and private processes, coaching collective based actions on the cooperation among the different subjects. Governance in effect, is formatted by the general relations net that includes whether the institutional actions, whether the formalities of interaction among public institutions, private organisms, collective movements, up to the same social actors that, in this process of continual feedback, are constituted like subjects of citizen. The objective content of citizenship, then, is definited by the "ability" of consistence (subjective motivations, shared representations.) that characterize the identity of the subject and by the "capability" of autonomy and movement that he realizes in the own social surrounding (formative capability, techniques, financial.). But there is an other passage:the reality appears us, then, like a system of interactions/ relations, corporate from other nets, his distributions of weights determines the difference among actor and subject. The individual is characterized for a substantial difficulty to govern the complexity of his relations: he possesses all the informative data from his nets, but he is not in degree, alone, to develop the adequate logic to categorize and govern this kit of experiences.