Massimo Perrone - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Books by Massimo Perrone

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 20-25 libri Quarti, ed. C. Burdich – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Bristol, CT 2020 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.4.2/2)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 18-35 libri Primi, ed. M. Perrone – F. Retucci, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Bristol, CT 2019 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.1.3)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 4-17 libri Primi, ed. F. Retucci – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2017 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.1.2)

[1] Hic oritur questio etc. Circ... more [1] Hic oritur questio etc. Circa distinctionem istam primo queritur utrum generatio sit in diuinis, secundo de ueritate propositionum exprimentium hanc generationem. Ad primum sic proceditur, et uidetur quod in diuinis non sit generatio, quia a quo remouetur superius, et inferius; set mutatio superior est ad generationem; ergo, cum in diuinis non sit mutatio, uidetur quod nec generatio. [2] Item, si in diuinis esset generatio, illa esset equiuoca uel uniuoca; set non est equiuoca nec uniuoca; ergo etc. Probatio minoris, et primo quod non sit ibi generatio equiuoca, | quia, secundum Avgvstinvm, in Filio est perfecta ratio ymaginis, quia in eo nulla est dissimilitudo; set ratio equiuoca excludit perfectam similitudinem; ergo etc. Item, nec uniuoca, quia tantum differunt gignens et genitum quantum proprietates eorum constitutiue; set paternitas et filiatio, que constituunt Patrem gignentem | et Filium genitum, sunt diuersarum

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 39-44 libri Secundi, ed. M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2014 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.2.4)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 22-38 libri Secundi, ed. F. Retucci – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2013 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.2.3)

Papers by Massimo Perrone

Research paper thumbnail of L’Opus imperfectum in Matthaeum dello ps.-Crisostomo nell’opera di Meister Eckhart, in: Per studium et doctrinam. Fonti e testi di filosofia medievale dal XII al XIV secolo. Studi in onore di Loris Sturlese, a cura di A. Beccarisi – A. Palazzo, Aracne Editrice, Roma 2018, pp. 173-195.

Research paper thumbnail of «La ‘Licenza di Naaman il Siro’ (4Re 5,18-19) nel contesto della tradizione esegetica del Medioevo latino», in: Parrhesia e dissimulazione. La verità di fronte al potere, (a cura di) M. Nicoletti, Morcelliana, Brescia 2014 (Politica e Religione, 2012/2013), pp. 267-290

Research paper thumbnail of «Utrum relatio in divinis prius constituat quam distinguat aut e converso. Il dibattito sulle relazioni trinitarie in una quaestio di Enrico di Lubecca (Quodl. I/1)», in: Per perscrutationem philosophicam, A. Beccarisi – R. Imbach – P. Porro (hrsg.), Hamburg 2008 , pp. 224-239

Research paper thumbnail of «Il Quodlibet di Adenulfo di Anagni. Analisi ed edizione», in: Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 63 (2021), pp. 11-54.

This article provides the first complete edition of the eighteen quodlibetal questions ascribed t... more This article provides the first complete edition of the eighteen quodlibetal questions ascribed to Adenulf of Anagni (†1289) with an introductory study concerning the life and works of this author. Although the analysis of the texts reveals a strong dependence of Adenulf on the Summa Halensis, Thomas Aquinas and Gerard of Abbeville and a modest degree of originality, these questions represent an important source for the rising Thomism and the reception of the most prominent 13th-century figures.

Research paper thumbnail of «The Quodlibet of Richard Knapwell OP», in: Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 86/2 (2019), pp. 315-364.

The English Dominican theologian Richard Knapwell, master of theology at Oxford in 1284-85, was o... more The English Dominican theologian Richard Knapwell, master of theology at Oxford in 1284-85, was one of the most significant figures that contributed to the early diffusion of Thomism in England. Knapwell, who is mainly known for his Correctorium 'Quare' (transmitted anonymously but generally ascribed to him) and for his disputed questions on the unicity of the substantial form and on the word, is also the author of 29 short quodlibetal questions, probably discussed at Oxford, in which Aquinas's teaching is, in most cases, defended. Knapwell supports, for instance, the real distinction between essence and the act of existing as well as the doctrine of angels as individual immaterial essences. Nevertheless, the unicity of substantial form is not yet defended. This evidence suggests that Knapwell's adherence to Thomism has not been an uncritical process, but a gradual approach that was subject to evaluation. In the first part of the present contribution, the main aspects concerning Knapwell's life and works are summarized. The second part offers the first complete critical edition of Knapwell's Quodlibet.

Research paper thumbnail of «Das Quodlibet des Wilhelm von Hothum O.P. (ca. 1235-1298). Untersuchung und kritische Edition», in: Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 84/2 (2017), pp. 285-342.

William of hothum (also called de hozum or de odone) was probably born in Yorkshire, joined the D... more William of hothum (also called de hozum or de odone) was probably born in Yorkshire, joined the Dominican order, and studied in Paris at the convent of st. Jacques, where he became doctor of theology before 1280. appointed provincial of the Dominican order in england in 1282, he came into conflict with the Franciscan archbishop of canterbury, John Peckham, over hothum's defense of 'thomistic' positions; most important among these controversial positions was the doctrine of the unicity of the substantial form in human beings. the present investigation shows that hothum played a leading role in the defense of 'thomism' at oxford. nonetheless, his Quodlibet, here edited for the first time, also reveals a critical attitude toward thomas aquinas and a proximity to the augustinian tradition, especially in the fields of epistemology and angelology.

Research paper thumbnail of «Alcune osservazioni sulle fasi redazionali del Commento al I libro delle Sentenze di Durando di Saint-Pourçain (1270/75-1334)», in: Studi Filosofici, 39 (2016), pp. 49-68.

Joseph Kock, the foremost scholar of the works of Durand of St. Pourçain, maintains that the Firs... more Joseph Kock, the foremost scholar of the works of Durand of St. Pourçain, maintains that the First Book of his Commentary on the Sentences did not undergo revision, despite alterations to the Second and Fourth Books. My research, however, demonstrates considerable modifications in the First Book. This is evident both through internal indications in the text and the presence of external testimony to these modifications; two manuscripts from the Evidentiae contra Durandum, attributed to Durandellus, a well known Thomist critic of Durand, add five new arguments taken from "the new work" (in novo opere) which are preserved in Durand's imparted text. On the basis of this evidence this article argues that the manuscript tradition of the First Book reveals a very elaborate phase that can be considered a "second redaction".

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 20-25 libri Quarti, ed. C. Burdich – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Bristol, CT 2020 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.4.2/2)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 18-35 libri Primi, ed. M. Perrone – F. Retucci, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Bristol, CT 2019 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.1.3)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 4-17 libri Primi, ed. F. Retucci – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2017 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.1.2)

[1] Hic oritur questio etc. Circ... more [1] Hic oritur questio etc. Circa distinctionem istam primo queritur utrum generatio sit in diuinis, secundo de ueritate propositionum exprimentium hanc generationem. Ad primum sic proceditur, et uidetur quod in diuinis non sit generatio, quia a quo remouetur superius, et inferius; set mutatio superior est ad generationem; ergo, cum in diuinis non sit mutatio, uidetur quod nec generatio. [2] Item, si in diuinis esset generatio, illa esset equiuoca uel uniuoca; set non est equiuoca nec uniuoca; ergo etc. Probatio minoris, et primo quod non sit ibi generatio equiuoca, | quia, secundum Avgvstinvm, in Filio est perfecta ratio ymaginis, quia in eo nulla est dissimilitudo; set ratio equiuoca excludit perfectam similitudinem; ergo etc. Item, nec uniuoca, quia tantum differunt gignens et genitum quantum proprietates eorum constitutiue; set paternitas et filiatio, que constituunt Patrem gignentem | et Filium genitum, sunt diuersarum

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 39-44 libri Secundi, ed. M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2014 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.2.4)

Research paper thumbnail of Durandi de Sancto Porciano, Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Distinctiones 22-38 libri Secundi, ed. F. Retucci – M. Perrone, Peeters, Leuven-Paris-Walpole, MA 2013 (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca, Bd. 10.2.3)

Research paper thumbnail of L’Opus imperfectum in Matthaeum dello ps.-Crisostomo nell’opera di Meister Eckhart, in: Per studium et doctrinam. Fonti e testi di filosofia medievale dal XII al XIV secolo. Studi in onore di Loris Sturlese, a cura di A. Beccarisi – A. Palazzo, Aracne Editrice, Roma 2018, pp. 173-195.

Research paper thumbnail of «La ‘Licenza di Naaman il Siro’ (4Re 5,18-19) nel contesto della tradizione esegetica del Medioevo latino», in: Parrhesia e dissimulazione. La verità di fronte al potere, (a cura di) M. Nicoletti, Morcelliana, Brescia 2014 (Politica e Religione, 2012/2013), pp. 267-290

Research paper thumbnail of «Utrum relatio in divinis prius constituat quam distinguat aut e converso. Il dibattito sulle relazioni trinitarie in una quaestio di Enrico di Lubecca (Quodl. I/1)», in: Per perscrutationem philosophicam, A. Beccarisi – R. Imbach – P. Porro (hrsg.), Hamburg 2008 , pp. 224-239

Research paper thumbnail of «Il Quodlibet di Adenulfo di Anagni. Analisi ed edizione», in: Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 63 (2021), pp. 11-54.

This article provides the first complete edition of the eighteen quodlibetal questions ascribed t... more This article provides the first complete edition of the eighteen quodlibetal questions ascribed to Adenulf of Anagni (†1289) with an introductory study concerning the life and works of this author. Although the analysis of the texts reveals a strong dependence of Adenulf on the Summa Halensis, Thomas Aquinas and Gerard of Abbeville and a modest degree of originality, these questions represent an important source for the rising Thomism and the reception of the most prominent 13th-century figures.

Research paper thumbnail of «The Quodlibet of Richard Knapwell OP», in: Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 86/2 (2019), pp. 315-364.

The English Dominican theologian Richard Knapwell, master of theology at Oxford in 1284-85, was o... more The English Dominican theologian Richard Knapwell, master of theology at Oxford in 1284-85, was one of the most significant figures that contributed to the early diffusion of Thomism in England. Knapwell, who is mainly known for his Correctorium 'Quare' (transmitted anonymously but generally ascribed to him) and for his disputed questions on the unicity of the substantial form and on the word, is also the author of 29 short quodlibetal questions, probably discussed at Oxford, in which Aquinas's teaching is, in most cases, defended. Knapwell supports, for instance, the real distinction between essence and the act of existing as well as the doctrine of angels as individual immaterial essences. Nevertheless, the unicity of substantial form is not yet defended. This evidence suggests that Knapwell's adherence to Thomism has not been an uncritical process, but a gradual approach that was subject to evaluation. In the first part of the present contribution, the main aspects concerning Knapwell's life and works are summarized. The second part offers the first complete critical edition of Knapwell's Quodlibet.

Research paper thumbnail of «Das Quodlibet des Wilhelm von Hothum O.P. (ca. 1235-1298). Untersuchung und kritische Edition», in: Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 84/2 (2017), pp. 285-342.

William of hothum (also called de hozum or de odone) was probably born in Yorkshire, joined the D... more William of hothum (also called de hozum or de odone) was probably born in Yorkshire, joined the Dominican order, and studied in Paris at the convent of st. Jacques, where he became doctor of theology before 1280. appointed provincial of the Dominican order in england in 1282, he came into conflict with the Franciscan archbishop of canterbury, John Peckham, over hothum's defense of 'thomistic' positions; most important among these controversial positions was the doctrine of the unicity of the substantial form in human beings. the present investigation shows that hothum played a leading role in the defense of 'thomism' at oxford. nonetheless, his Quodlibet, here edited for the first time, also reveals a critical attitude toward thomas aquinas and a proximity to the augustinian tradition, especially in the fields of epistemology and angelology.

Research paper thumbnail of «Alcune osservazioni sulle fasi redazionali del Commento al I libro delle Sentenze di Durando di Saint-Pourçain (1270/75-1334)», in: Studi Filosofici, 39 (2016), pp. 49-68.

Joseph Kock, the foremost scholar of the works of Durand of St. Pourçain, maintains that the Firs... more Joseph Kock, the foremost scholar of the works of Durand of St. Pourçain, maintains that the First Book of his Commentary on the Sentences did not undergo revision, despite alterations to the Second and Fourth Books. My research, however, demonstrates considerable modifications in the First Book. This is evident both through internal indications in the text and the presence of external testimony to these modifications; two manuscripts from the Evidentiae contra Durandum, attributed to Durandellus, a well known Thomist critic of Durand, add five new arguments taken from "the new work" (in novo opere) which are preserved in Durand's imparted text. On the basis of this evidence this article argues that the manuscript tradition of the First Book reveals a very elaborate phase that can be considered a "second redaction".