Moshe Segal - Profile on Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Moshe Segal

But, if that Massive Body Accelerates according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma, this also implies, as will be presented in this paper, that all the Work done by this external Force, which is also all the Energy exerted on this Massive Body, is already converted to the Kinetic Energy that that Massive Body acquires, or, in other words, is already manifested and embedded in the Kinetic Energy that that Massive Body acquires, because of the above-mentioned external Force which was exerted on it.

However, if an external Force is exerted on an Electrically Charged Massive Body, what was presented above might need modifications.

Because, if an Electrically Charged Massive Body does indeed Accelerates also according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma, and all the Work done by the external Force exerted on it, is already manifested and embedded in the Kinetic Energy embedded in this Electrically Charged Massive Body, then this cannot explain the origin of the Extra Energy that an Electrically Charged Massive Body acquires, which is manifested in the Electromagnetic Waves that it emits when it Accelerates, and the Magnetic Field that surrounds it when it moves.

If the above presented dilemma is further substantiated, then, the resolution to this dilemma should be only one of two possibilities: either the Extra Energy mentioned-above, is generated from nothing, which clearly violates the Energy Conservation Principle, or, as this paper predicts, that Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma might not be the proper equation which should be used to calculate the Acceleration that an Electrically Charged Body acquires, when an external Force is exerted on it.

Despite the fact that the proof provided to the prediction that F=ma might not be correct for Electrically Charged Bodies, is based on very simple but significant arguments, as can be also concluded from what was already presented above, since that prediction does challenge a significant element of the nowadays Science of Physics (F=ma), which is accepted as a definitely correct element, then, an additional support for that prediction might be required, to further substantiate that prediction.

But because, the proof provided to that dilemma is based on very simple arguments, that additional support should not be provided from additional theoretical arguments, but rather, it should be provided by a proposal for a physical experiment, which if implemented, might provide validity to that prediction.

Thus, this paper does also propose such an experiment, which is based on measurements related to the Acceleration embedded in the Attraction between two Electrically Charged Bodies under Coulomb's Law Force, which is clearly a scenario of Forces exerted on Electrically Charged Bodies.

Based on the Identical Structures of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, F = G⋅(m1⋅m2)/ r^2, and Coulomb's Law, F = Ke⋅(q1⋅q2)/r^2, this paper predicts that the origin of the Acceleration embedded in the Attraction between two Electrically Charged Bodies under Coulomb's Law Force is the Electric Fields, which also implies, that the Electric Fields Strength are also forms of Acceleration, as the Gravitational Field Strength is already recognized as a form of Acceleration, which also implies, that the Acceleration embedded in the Attraction between two Electrically Charged Bodies under the Coulomb's Law Force cannot be calculated by the equation F=ma, as was also presented before above.

Thus, a measurement of the Time to collision between two Electrically Charged Bodies, in a scenario of the Attraction between two Electrically Charged Bodies under the Coulomb's Law Force, is a good indication for concluding, if the Acceleration in that scenario does indeed complies, or does not comply with the equation F=ma.

As already presented above, such an experiment is proposed, and described in this paper.

If that experiment will be implemented, and its results will be successful, this will provide the required additional substantiation, to the prediction that F=ma might not be correct for Electrically Charged Bodies.

However, the substantiation of the above-mentioned prediction, will have also additional significant implications.

Because, if the above-mentioned prediction will be validated, and also the Electric Fields Strength will be recognized as a form of Acceleration, then, this will have significant implications also on how the entities of Space and Time should be perceived.

The nowadays Science of Physics states, that there is only one, single, three-dimensional entity of Space, and just one, single, one-dimensional entity of Time, which together are Interweaved to form the real one, single, four-dimensional Interwoven Space/Time entity, presented in Einstein's General Relativity Theory.

However, if the Electric Field Strength will be recognized as a form of Acceleration, this paper presents that this will also imply that there must be multiple, separate, Interwoven Space/Time entities, each attributed to a separate form of Energy, and not just one single, four-dimensional Interwoven Space/Time entity, presented in Einstein's General Relativity Theory.

The analogy presented by Einstein's General Relativity of mass curving Space/Time works well for Gravity, where the curvature always leads to Attraction. However, it struggles to explain the bidirectional nature of Electromagnetic Forces (Attraction and repulsion). A simple "dent" in Space/Time cannot account for both pushing and pulling.

Thus, as also presented in this paper, the prediction of multiple, separate, Interwoven Space/Time entities might be the lead to start a Unification between Gravity and Electromagnetism, a significantly unresolved issue today, and explain the origin of the Attraction or the Repulsion between Electric Charges, an issue which is still a mystery today.

Thus, from the above follows, that the prediction, presented in this paper, that F=ma might not be correct for Electrically Charged Bodies, which as presented above can be proved with very simple but significant arguments, might be only the first step, of more significant implications, and thus, an implementation of the above-mentioned proposed experiment, might be an important endeavor.

This paper is based on several additional papers, by the author of this paper, and as such, summa... more This paper is based on several additional papers, by the author of this paper, and as such, summarizes a broad theoretical research work. These papers intended initially to investigate the nature and the characteristics of the Entity of the Electric Charge. The first two parts of this research, dealing with Electric Charge, Energy, and Space, were published in two papers: "Energy Analysis of a Null Electromagnetic Wave" and "The Nature of Space and Dark Energy, Based on Electric and Magnetic Fields' Behavior in Space in the Energy Pairs Theory Framework" . The first paper, , concluded that the Electric Charge is a form of Energy, similarly to Mass being recognized as a form of Energy by Einstein's Special Relativity Theory. And since all the tangible and perceptible matter in the universe is composed of only two Entities: Mass and Electric Charge, then, the first paper, , concluded that all the tangible and perceptible matter in the universe is just a form of Energy. The second paper, , provided a reasonable explanation for the mysterious Dark Energy and concluded that also Space might be a form (or facet) of Energy. A third paper, by the author of this paper, "A New Theory Expands Einstein's General Relativity Theory to Include Both Electric Charge and Mass Entities" , studied the origins of the Electrically Charged Bodies' Interactions. It provided an explanation for what causes the Attraction/Repulsion between Electric Charges, which is still a mystery, similarly to the explanation of Einstein's General Relativity Theory for what causes the Attraction between Massive Objects. As such, the third paper, , is an expansion of Einstein's General Relativity Theory to include in it not only Massive Objects but also

Gravity is already recognized as form of Acceleration, but the nowadays Science of Physics does n... more Gravity is already recognized as form of Acceleration, but the nowadays Science of Physics does not recognize (yet) the Electric Field also as a form of Acceleration. However, Structural Identities between Newton's Universal Gravitational Law and Coulomb's Law, strongly indicate that the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of Acceleration. The implications resulting from the realization, that the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, might not seem to be very significant implications, at first glance. However, this paper does present that, the implications resulting from the realization that the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, are indeed very significant. One immediate implication, from the realization that the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, presented in this paper, is the realization that Newton's Second Law of Motion (F=ma) might not be always valid. Newton's Second Law of Motion is accepted, by the nowadays Science of Physics, as a Universal Law, and as such, it is accepted as being valid for any scenario containing a Force exerted on a Massive Body. However, as presented in this paper, if the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, then, Newton's Second Law of Motion might not be valid for Electrically Charged bodies attracted or repelled under Coulomb's Law, and, in such a scenario, Newton's Second Law of Motion should be replaced by a different Law. In addition to the above, additional more significant and revolutionary implications, regarding how Humans should perceive, the very Nature of the entities of Space and Time, also arise, if the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, which also might provide an answer to the question: why Electric Charges attract or repel each other? That question is still a mystery today, although the answer to the question: why Massive Bodies attract each other? is already provided by Einstein's General Relativity theory. The above might also provide a lead to achieve a simple Unification between Gravity and Electricity, a quest which the nowadays Science of Physics is still struggling with, without achieving yet satisfactory results. In addition to presenting very convincing arguments that the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, based on Structural Identities between Newton's Universal Gravitational Law and Coulomb's Law, this article also proposes a relatively simple experiment, which if implemented, it might physically prove, (or disprove) that the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of Acceleration. Parts of this paper also exist in additional preprints, by the author of this paper, which are already posted on the web. But this paper contains additional materials, relating mainly to additional more significant implications, if the Electric Field will be also recognized as a form of Acceleration. The discussion, in this paper, starts with an introduction presenting why Gravity is already recognized as a form of acceleration, and then, continues to the arguments why the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of acceleration.

Implications if the Electric Field will be recognized as a form of Acceleration

Authorea (Authorea), Dec 26, 2023

he Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, then, Newton's Seco... more he Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, then, Newton's Second Law of Motion might not be valid for Electrically Charged bodies attracted or repelled under Coulomb's Law, and, in such a scenario, Newton's Second Law of Motion should be replaced by a different Law. In addition to the above, additional more significant and revolutionary implications, regarding how Humans should perceive, the very Nature of the entities of Space and Time, also arise, if the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, which also might provide an answer to the question: why Electric Charges attract or repel each other? That question is still a mystery today, although the answer to the question: why Massive Bodies attract each other? is already provided by Einstein's General Relativity theory. The above might also provide a lead to achieve a simple Unification between Gravity and Electricity, a quest which the nowadays Science of Physics is still struggling with, without achieving yet satisfactory results. In addition to presenting very convincing arguments that the Electric Field might be also recognized as a form of acceleration, based on Structural Identities between Newton's Universal Gravitational Law and Coulomb's Law, this article also proposes a relatively simple experiment, which if implemented, it might physically prove, (or disprove) that Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 16, 2024 Qeios ID: 4VBWL7.3 · https://doi.org/10.32388/4VBWL7.3 1/21 the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of Acceleration. Parts of this paper also exist in additional preprints, by the author of this paper, which are already posted on the web. But this paper contains additional materials, relating mainly to additional more significant implications, if the Electric Field will be also recognized as a form of Acceleration. The discussion, in this paper, starts with an introduction presenting why Gravity is already recognized as a form of acceleration, and then, continues to the arguments why the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of acceleration.

Authorea (Authorea), Dec 5, 2023

Like Gravity, the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of Acceleration

Social Science Research Network, Dec 31, 2022

A New Angle for Explaining the Wave-Particle Duality of Light

Social Science Research Network, Dec 31, 2022

The Wave-Particle duality of Light should be considered as an unresolved mystery. Indeed, Light m... more The Wave-Particle duality of Light should be considered as an unresolved mystery. Indeed, Light manifests these two very different phenomena simultaneously. On one hand Light should be viewed as a stream of Particles. Einstein initially introduced the understanding that Light should be viewed as a stream of Particles (named Photons), to explain the Photoelectric effect. On the other hand, Light clearly exhibits a Wave facet, dating back to Newton's days, who measured the wavelength of Light with his Newton's rings interference observations. However, these two very different facets of Light, its Particle facet, and its Wave facet, are so significantly different, which implies that the Wave-Particle duality of Light still awaits additional clarification and additional explanation, which was not yet provided by mainstream Physics. Instead, nowadays mainstream Physics just accepts the fact that Light embed these two very different facets simultaneously, and exhibits each facet in different experiments or situations. This paper proposes a new angle for explaining the Wave-Particle duality of Light, based on the famous Mutual Annihilation process, in which an Electron and a Positron annihilate each other to create Photons, and on the famous inverse Pair Production process, in which a Photon, in certain conditions, converts back into a pair of an Electron and a Positron. Actually, the connection between the nature of Photons and the Electron and the Positron is already presented in another paper, namely, the Electron Positron-Photon idea. The Electron Positron-Photon idea, which is due originally to (the late) Prof. J. P. Wesley, in his paper titled: "Light, a Flux of Electric Dipole Photons" [4], proposed a model of the Photon as an Electric Dipole Photon which might be an Electron-Positron pair separated by a distance L. There are two reasons why the Electron Positron-Photon idea, as presented in Prof. J. P. Wesley's paper, cannot be considered a viable concept: • The science of Physics recognizes Photons as being composed of pure Energy, without any Mass or Electric Charges associated to Photons. However, the Electron and the Positron do embed Mass and Electric Charges, and thus, Photons cannot be composed of pairs of Electrons and Positrons as the Electron Positron-Photon idea presented in Prof. J. P. Wesley's paper, states. • Photons travel at the velocity of Light, and thus, according to Einstein's Special Relativity Theory, if Photons are composed of pairs of Electrons and Positrons as Prof. J. P. Wesley's Electron Positron-Photon idea states, then, their Masses must increase to virtually an infinite Mass magnitude. This paper proposes another aspect of the Photon nature, which is also based on the Electron and the Positron, which does not have the limitations which were already presented above, in Prof. J. P. Wesley's Electron Positron-Photon idea.

Dark Energy is one of the most disturbing mysteries of the nowadays Science of Physics. This conc... more Dark Energy is one of the most disturbing mysteries of the nowadays Science of Physics. This concept was introduced after it was discovered that the expansion rate of the Universe is much bigger than an expansion rate that can be supported by all the amount of the Traceable Energy that the nowadays Science of Physics can calculate and detect. Thus, the nowadays Science of Physics presented the assumption, that there must be an additional amount of Energy, in the Universe, which cannot be detected, and thus, it is denoted as Dark Energy. The amount of this mysterious Dark Energy, assumed by the nowadays Science of Physics, amounts to 70% of the assumed amount of the Total Energy in the Universe (Dark plus Traceable Energy), in order to explain the detected expansion rate of the Universe. This study presents the prediction, that Electromagnetism might be the source of most of this mysterious Dark Energy. This prediction is based on scenarios, related to Electromagnetism, in which Energy seems to be either disappearing, or be created out of nothing, and thus, seems to be violating the Energy Conservation Principle, which is a corner stone of the Science of Physics. Because the Dark Energy concept is already an acceptable concept, by the nowadays Science of Physics, then, this paper predicts, that in the above-mentioned scenarios, in which Energy seems to disappear, the Energy did not disappear, it was converted into Dark Energy. And, this paper also predicts, that in the above-mentioned scenarios, in which Energy seems to be created out of nothing, this Energy was not created out of nothing, it was Dark Energy which converted back into Traceable Energy. The scenarios mentioned above, in which Energy seems to either disappear or be created out of nothing, are scenarios of Consolidating Electromagnetic Waves, from separate sources.

The Nowadays Science of Physics states that when an external Force is exerted on any Massive Body... more The Nowadays Science of Physics states that when an external Force is exerted on any Massive Body it causes an Acceleration of this Massive Body according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma. From the above follows that, when an external Force is exerted on an Uncharged (Not Electrically Charged) Body, since that Body Accelerates according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma, then, this also implies, as will be presented also in this paper, that that Body acquires a Kinetic Energy equal to: mv ^2 /2, according to the Newtonian Physics.
But, if that Uncharged Body Accelerates according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma, this also implies, as will be also presented in this paper, that all the Work done by this external Force, is already manifested and embedded in the Kinetic Energy that that Uncharged Body
acquired, because of the above-mentioned external Force which was exerted on it.
However, if an external Force is exerted on an Electrically Charged Body, what was presented above might need some modifications.
Because, if an Electrically Charged Massive Body does indeed Accelerates also according to Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma, and all the Work done by the external Force exerted on it, is already manifested and embedded in the Kinetic Energy embedded in this Electrically
Charged Massive Body, then this cannot explain the origin of the Extra Energy that an Electrically Charged Body acquires when it Accelerates, which is manifested in the Electromagnetic Waves it emits and the Magnetic Field that surrounds it when it moves.
A possible resolution to the above stated dilemma might be, as presented in this paper, that Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma might not be the proper equation which should be used to calculate the Acceleration that an Electrically Charged Body acquires, when an external Force
is exerted on it.
This might provide extra support to what is already presented in additional papers, by the author of this paper, which also present the above possibility. The above-mentioned additional papers also propose an experiment.
Thus, what is presented in this paper might provide extra support to the statement that an implementation of the above-mentioned experiment, might be an important endeavor.

A corner stone of Physics is the Energy Conservation principle which states that the Energy is al... more A corner stone of Physics is the Energy Conservation principle which states that the Energy is always conserved and that the Energy, embedded in the Universe, cannot disappear or be created from nothing. This should imply that the Total amount of the Energy, which is embedded in the whole Universe, must be a constant value. However, this paper provides significant arguments that evaluations of Energy amounts by Humans, might be also relative to the Human evaluator who evaluates the Energy amount, and two separate Human evaluators evaluating the Total Energy Content of several specific Energy components, in the Universe, might arrive at different results, relating to this Total Energy Content, of these several specific Energy components, which they evaluated. The paper also elaborates on the Implications of the conclusion that evaluations of Energy amounts by Humans might be also relative.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Jun 21, 2023

The acceptable notion today is that Electromagnetic waves from separate sources cannot consolidat... more The acceptable notion today is that Electromagnetic waves from separate sources cannot consolidate [4]. However, the author of this article published several articles [1], [2], [3], [5] which argue that Electromagnetic (EM) waves from separate sources do consolidate. In addition to the scenarios described in articles [1], [2], [3], Article [5] adds further support to the statement that EM waves from separate sources can consolidate, support that everybody can experience, from everyday experience, every day, which can also be recorded on photos. This scenario is presented again, also in this article. However, if EM waves from separate sources do consolidate, this seems to embed paradoxes, which must be addressed, because the Energy Conservation Principle seems to be violated. The Energy Pairs Theory, proposed initially by the author of this article in article [1], and presented again briefly in this article, proposes a framework which resolves and explains the paradoxes embedded in consolidations of EM waves from separate sources, and other paradoxes and unanswered and open questions, as presented already in article [1], and presented briefly again in this article.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Jul 19, 2023

A discussion related to the uniqueness of the velocity of Light

SSRN Electronic Journal

Light velocity, when measured by Humans, would always result in a constant value and the maximum ... more Light velocity, when measured by Humans, would always result in a constant value and the maximum possible velocity, a claim that was presented by Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory as an axiom, without any proof. The above demonstrates the uniqueness of the velocity of Light. But it should be also emphasized that the velocity of Light also presents a severe peculiarity, which is presented as follows: When a moving Human spectator measures the velocity value of any tangible substance, for example, the velocity of a moving Mass body, the velocity, and the direction of motion of this spectator, relative to the velocity and the direction of motion of this Mass body, does affect the measured velocity value of this Mass body, by this Human spectator. But, when a moving Human spectator, measures the velocity value of a Light beam, the velocity, and the direction of motion of this spectator, relative to the direction of motion of this Light beam, does not affect at all, the measured velocity value of this Light beam, by this Human spectator, which always results in a constant Light velocity value, which is also the maximum velocity value that Humans can measure. This should be regarded as a severe peculiarity, in any velocity value measurements of Light beams, by Humans, which must be also explained. This paper provides a tentative explanation to the uniqueness related to the velocity of Light and to the severe peculiarity related to the velocity of Light that are presented above. This explanation is based on a prediction that Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, do not really exit. The author of this paper presented this prediction in an additional paper titled: “A discussion related to the existence of the entities of Space and Time” (12) which is referenced in this paper. The details related to this prediction are also presented in this paper. That referenced paper (12) also suggests an experiment, which if implemented, and its result will be successful, might provide validity, or disprove, the predictions presented in that referenced paper, and, as a result, also might provide validity, or disprove, what is presented in this paper

The Electron Positron-Photon idea, which is due originally to (the late) Prof. J. P. Wesley, in h... more The Electron Positron-Photon idea, which is due originally to (the late) Prof. J. P. Wesley, in his article titled: “Light, a Flux of Electric Dipole Photons” [4], proposed a model of the Photon as an Electric Dipole Photon which might be an Electron-Positron pair separated by a distance L. However, since Photons propagate at the speed of light, and Electrons and Positrons have rest Mass values which are not zero, then, if Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory conclusion, relating to Mass gain with velocity, is accepted as valid, then, if Photons are Electron-Positron pairs, their Mass must increase to be virtually an infinite value. Thus, if Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory is accepted as a valid theory, Photons cannot be pairs of Electrons and Positrons. J.P. Wesley did not accept the relativistic Mass gain with velocity as concluded from Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory, and as such, proposed this Photon model, which provides a possible resolution to the Wave-Particle prob...

A New Model of Space Which Expands Einstein's General Relativity Theory to Relate Also to Electric Charges

viXra, Sep 1, 2020

Energy Pairs Theory Resolves Energy Conservation Issues

viXra, 2019

The primary aim of this study was to explain some energy conservation issues which seem to be ign... more The primary aim of this study was to explain some energy conservation issues which seem to be ignored today. These energy conservation issues relate to energy conservation issues in the field of energies embedded in static electric fields and in magnetic fields generated by moving charges which move at a constant velocity. The study uses the Energy Pair Theory (EPT) developed in another article (that can be found at: http://viXra.org/abs/1911.0176) (Ref. 4), which seems to provide a reasonable explanation to these energy conservation issues. The article also arrives at the surprising conclusion that Space itself might be also some form of Energy.

This article presents the hypothesis that the only independent entity is Energy. This is based on... more This article presents the hypothesis that the only independent entity is Energy. This is based on conclusions derived from several published articles, by the author of this article, which conclude the following: This hypothesis might also provide an explanation to why Light speed must be a constant value and the maximum Based on the conclusions of these published articles, mentioned above, this article suggests a tentative connection between Energy and Light speed which might provide an explanation to why Light speed is a constant value, causing Light speed measurements by any spectator which monitors that Light speed, to result always to be that constant value, and this is not dependent on the spectator velocity relative to the velocity of that measured Light speed. This also might explain why the maximum attainable velocity is that constant value attributed to the speed of Light. These statements, about Light speed being the maximum attainable velocity and being a constant value w...

September 19, 2023

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023

Humans need the entity of Space to perceive relative positions between objects. Humans also need ... more Humans need the entity of Space to perceive relative positions between objects. Humans also need the entities of Space and Time to calculate values that Humans attribute to Motions, such as Velocity or Acceleration. The entities of Space and Time are also the entities that compose the four-dimensional Interwoven Space/Time entity, introduced by Einstein’s General Relativity theory, which provided an explanation of the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies. However, although the notions of Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, do provide the significant explanation of the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies, via Einstein’s General Relativity theory, the notions of Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, are not sufficient for providing explanations to additional similar unanswered questions, such as : what is the origin of the attraction or the repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies? Or, why the velocity of Light, measured by Humans, always results in a constant value and the maximum velocity that Humans can measure? This paper presents the following prediction: Electric (or Magnetic) Fields are forms of Accelerations, like the Gravitational Field, which is already recognized as a form of Acceleration. This prediction also leads to the following thesis: Changes and Movements are the result of Interactions between Energies, and the entities of Space and Time are not entities that exist. The entities of Space and Time are notions (or entities), invented by Humans, because Humans need such notions to perceive Changes and Motions. For some Interactions between Energies, which result in Changes or Motions, Humans can attribute, to these Interactions, attributes of Space and Time, which will assist in providing explanations to why these Changes or Motions are the result of these Energies Interactions. However, this paper predicts, that different sets of Interactions between Energies, should be assigned separate and independent attributes of Space and Time, different and independent from the Space and the Time attributes, assigned to other sets of Interactions between Energies, to provide an explanation for the origin of motions which are yet unexplained, such as: what is the origin of the attraction or the repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies? 2 Because different and independent Space and Time attributes should be assigned to different sets of Interactions between Energies, then, Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, cannot exist, because the above implies, that there should be multiple, independent notions of Space, and multiple, independent notions of Time, and not just one universal Space entity, and just one universal Time entity, as Humans perceive the Space and the Time entities. By abandoning the conclusion that the entities of Space and Time exist, and by concluding that Changes and Motions are only the results of Interactions between Energies, the origin of attraction or repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies can be explained, in addition to the explanation, already provided by Einstein’s General Relativity theory, relating to the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies. Also, by abandoning the conclusion that the entities of Space and Time exist, and by concluding that Changes and Motions are only the results of Interactions between Energies, a possible partial, tentative explanation might be also provided to the question: why the velocity of Light, measured by Humans, always results in a constant value and the maximum velocity that Humans can measure? The prediction that the entities of Space and Time do not really exist sounds as an extraordinary, unbelievable, and out of line statement, at first. This is because, as presented above, the notions of Space and Time are crucial notions, which Humans need them, to perceive, understand and calculate Motions and Changes. However, this paper also proposes a relatively simple experiment, which if implemented, and its results will be successful, as this paper predicts, this will either validate or disprove, what is presented in this paper.

However, if an external Force is exerted on an Electrically Charged Massive Body, what was presented above might need modifications.

As already presented above, such an experiment is proposed, and described in this paper.

However, the substantiation of the above-mentioned prediction, will have also additional significant implications.

Implications if the Electric Field will be recognized as a form of Acceleration

Authorea (Authorea), Dec 26, 2023

Authorea (Authorea), Dec 5, 2023

Like Gravity, the Electric Field should be also recognized as a form of Acceleration

Social Science Research Network, Dec 31, 2022

A New Angle for Explaining the Wave-Particle Duality of Light

Social Science Research Network, Dec 31, 2022

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Jun 21, 2023

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Jul 19, 2023

A discussion related to the uniqueness of the velocity of Light

SSRN Electronic Journal

A New Model of Space Which Expands Einstein's General Relativity Theory to Relate Also to Electric Charges

viXra, Sep 1, 2020

Energy Pairs Theory Resolves Energy Conservation Issues

viXra, 2019

September 19, 2023

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023