Rob Painting - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Rob Painting

Uploads

Papers by Rob Painting

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

Environmental Research Letters, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

Environmental Research Letters, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Supplementary Material

Research paper thumbnail of The Consensus Project: Survey of the peer-reviewed scientific literature to determine the degree of consensus on anthropogenic climate change

Research paper thumbnail of Comment on “Ocean heat content and Earthʼs radiation imbalance. II. Relation to climate shifts”

Physics Letters A, 2012

A recent paper by Douglass and Knox (hereafter DK12) states that the global flux imbalance betwee... more A recent paper by Douglass and Knox (hereafter DK12) states that the global flux imbalance between 2002 and 2008 was approximately −0.03 ± 0.06 W/m 2 , from which they concluded the CO 2 forcing feedback is negative. However, DK12 only consider the ocean heat content (OHC) increase from 0 to 700 meters, neglecting the OHC increase at greater depths. Here we include OHC data to a depth of 2000 meters and demonstrate this data explains the majority of the discrepancies between DK12 and previous works, and that the current global flux imbalance is consistent with continued anthropogenic climate change.

Research paper thumbnail of Reply to ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis’

Energy Policy, 2014

T14 0 s consensus value is based on a math error that manufactures 300 nonexistent rejection pape... more T14 0 s consensus value is based on a math error that manufactures 300 nonexistent rejection papers. T14 infers data drift using an inappropriate statistic that poorly correlates with consensus. Analysis of appropriate consensus statistics reveals no significant data drift. T14 wrongly conflates abstract ratings and author self-ratings; differences are detailed in C13. Re-analysis without T14 0 s errors confirms 97 71% consensus on AGW.

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

Environmental Research Letters, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

Environmental Research Letters, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Supplementary Material

Research paper thumbnail of The Consensus Project: Survey of the peer-reviewed scientific literature to determine the degree of consensus on anthropogenic climate change

Research paper thumbnail of Comment on “Ocean heat content and Earthʼs radiation imbalance. II. Relation to climate shifts”

Physics Letters A, 2012

A recent paper by Douglass and Knox (hereafter DK12) states that the global flux imbalance betwee... more A recent paper by Douglass and Knox (hereafter DK12) states that the global flux imbalance between 2002 and 2008 was approximately −0.03 ± 0.06 W/m 2 , from which they concluded the CO 2 forcing feedback is negative. However, DK12 only consider the ocean heat content (OHC) increase from 0 to 700 meters, neglecting the OHC increase at greater depths. Here we include OHC data to a depth of 2000 meters and demonstrate this data explains the majority of the discrepancies between DK12 and previous works, and that the current global flux imbalance is consistent with continued anthropogenic climate change.

Research paper thumbnail of Reply to ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis’

Energy Policy, 2014

T14 0 s consensus value is based on a math error that manufactures 300 nonexistent rejection pape... more T14 0 s consensus value is based on a math error that manufactures 300 nonexistent rejection papers. T14 infers data drift using an inappropriate statistic that poorly correlates with consensus. Analysis of appropriate consensus statistics reveals no significant data drift. T14 wrongly conflates abstract ratings and author self-ratings; differences are detailed in C13. Re-analysis without T14 0 s errors confirms 97 71% consensus on AGW.

Log In