Kenneth Rankin - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Kenneth Rankin

Research paper thumbnail of Consultant and trainee attitudes towards supervision of operative procedures in the UK and Ireland

The e-logbook is used to monitor progression through training and to assess training within teach... more The e-logbook is used to monitor progression through training and to assess training within teaching units. We document consultant and trainee opinions with regards to supervision status, and to inform guidelines for trainees and trainers using the e-logbook. A questionnaire was sent to consultants and trainees in the UK and Ireland. Eight theatre scenarios were described and respondents were asked to state what they felt was the appropriate supervision status for the trainee. Significantly more consultants in the UK use the e-logbook than those based in Ireland (58.5%:14.5%). There were differences in consensus response to the scenarios between consultants and trainees, and between Irish and UK based surgeons. We have documented the opinions of consultants and trainees from across the UK and Ireland with regards to supervision status for trainees under certain theatre situations. This information should support formal guidelines for all users of the logbook.

Research paper thumbnail of Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals

Bone & joint research, 2013

The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better unde... more The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245-7.

Research paper thumbnail of The orthopaedic research scene and strategies to improve it

The Bone & Joint Journal, 2014

Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproporti... more Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproportionately small fraction of available national and international funding for health research. With the burden of musculoskeletal disease increasing, high-quality research is required to improve the evidence base for orthopaedic practice. Using the current research landscape in the United Kingdom as an example, but also addressing the international perspective, we highlight the issues surrounding poor levels of research funding in trauma and orthopaedics and indicate avenues for improving the impact and success of surgical musculoskeletal research.

Research paper thumbnail of Of dogs and men: Comparative biology as a tool for the discovery of novel biomarkers and drug development targets in osteosarcoma

Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2012

The similarities between human and canine osteosarcoma with regard to histology, biological behav... more The similarities between human and canine osteosarcoma with regard to histology, biological behavior and molecular genetic alterations suggest that the dog provides a supplementary model for the development and preclinical testing of novel therapeutics. Counter intuitively, careful examination of the differences between OS in the two species may also be rewarding in terms of increasing our understanding of the pathogenesis of this cancer. This review will discuss the arguments in favor of the "dog model" and outline how the evaluation of treatment strategies in dogs has indicated avenues for improvement of protocols for human patients.

Research paper thumbnail of Characterisation of the cartilage DNA methylome in knee and hip osteoarthritis using high-density genome-wide analysis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of Expression analysis of osteoarthritis associated genes in mesenchymal stem cells differentiating into joint-associated cells

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of A Novel in Vitro Model to Investigate Behavior of Articular Chondrocytes in Osteoarthritis

The Journal of Rheumatology, 2010

To investigate in vivo simulation of the microenvironment in which osteoarthritis (OA) chondrocyt... more To investigate in vivo simulation of the microenvironment in which osteoarthritis (OA) chondrocytes are cultured in vitro. Human articular chondrocytes were cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Cells were cultured on standard culture plastic or a porous polyHEMA surface that closely resembles the in vivo cartilage microarchitecture. Morphological changes to the cells were demonstrated by fluorescent staining with DAPI and vinculin. Proteoglycan and type II collagen protein levels were assessed using established techniques. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) production was assessed by ELISA. The gene expression of type II collagen and SOX9 was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cells grown on culture plastic were seen to be flat and hexagonal. Cells cultured on the porous polyHEMA surface exhibited morphology in keeping with the in vivo microenvironment. Glycosaminoglycan release in hypoxia was high from cells cultured on standard culture plastic. Transcriptional expression of type II collagen was upregulated in hypoxia and by culture on the polyHEMA surface. Transcriptional expression of SOX9 in hypoxia was upregulated compared to normoxia; no significant effect was seen by varying the culture surface. Translational expression of type II collagen was upregulated at 20% oxygen on the polyHEMA surface compared to culture plastic and this was related to MMP-1 expression. Culture of chondrocytes in hypoxia and on a porous surface simulates the in vivo microenvironment and illustrates the molecular mechanisms of OA.

Research paper thumbnail of Skin moisturisers and surgical site preparation: a slippery problem?

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2007

Research paper thumbnail of Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?

International Orthopaedics, 2014

Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with clai... more Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with claims of clinical and scientific fact. Since the last assessment of the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements ten years ago, there have been legislative changes and media scrutiny which have shaped this practice. The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate these claims. Fifty claims from 50 advertisements were chosen randomly from six highly respected peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals (published July-December 2011). The evidence supporting each claim was assessed and validated by three orthopaedic surgeons. The assessors, blinded to product and company, rated the evidence and answered the following questions: Does the evidence as presented support the claim made in the advertisement and what is the quality of that evidence? Is the claim supported by enough evidence to influence your own clinical practice? Twenty-eight claims cited evidence from published literature, four from public presentations, 11 from manufacturer "data held on file" and seven had no supporting evidence. Only 12 claims were considered to have high-quality evidence and only 11 were considered well supported. A strong correlation was seen between the quality of evidence and strength of support (Spearman r = 0.945, p < 0.0001). The average ICC between the assessors' ratings was strong (r = 0.85) giving validity to the results. Orthopaedic surgeons must remain sceptical about the claims made in print advertisements. High-quality evidence is required by orthopaedic surgeons to influence clinical practice and this evidence should be sought by manufacturers wishing to market a successful product.

Research paper thumbnail of Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties

International Orthopaedics, 2013

The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the futu... more The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the future of orthopaedic research funding. We aim to characterise the trend in journal IF over the last decade and draw comparisons with other surgical specialties. We conducted an analysis of impact factors from Journal Citation Reports between 2000 and 2010. Between 2000 and 2010 the number of orthopaedic journals increased from 24 to 41, more than any other surgical specialty and the mean IF increased from 0.842 to 1.400. Journals printed in the English language had a significantly higher IF in the year 2010 (1.64 vs. 0.33, p = 0.01) than those printed in other languages. English language journals published in the US had significantly higher mean 2010 IF (1.932 vs. 1.243, p = 0.025) than those published in Europe, and this had changed compared with 2000 mean IF (0.978 Vs. 0.704, p = 0.360). Orthopaedics was ranked sixth out of 11 surgical subspecialties in 2000 but dropped to seventh out of 11 in 2010. The quality of orthopaedic journals has significantly increased over the last decade and this has been accompanied by a rise in mean IF. It is important that orthopaedics continues to improve the quality of research, which may help orthopaedic researchers secure funding in the future.

Research paper thumbnail of Common peroneal and posterior tibial ischemic nerve damage, a rare cause

Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2010

Research paper thumbnail of Floppy Lateral Position: Technique Tip

Foot & Ankle International, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Technique for shoulder ultrasonography in infants with congenital brachial plexus palsy

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Pulmonary embolism following ankle fractures treated without an operation – An analysis using National Health Service data

Injury, 2014

The majority of ankle fractures are stable and can be treated without an operation, most commonly... more The majority of ankle fractures are stable and can be treated without an operation, most commonly with cast immobilisation. Based on concerns regarding the risk of a venous thromboembolic event (VTE) while immobilised, there is currently debate as to whether these patients should receive VTE prophylaxis for the duration of treatment. Rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) in this patient group are unknown. This retrospective cohort study was designed to identify patients treated without an operation for ankle fracture and determine the occurrence of PE and inpatient mortality within 90 days of injury using the English National Health Service administrative databases. Logistic regression models were used to assess the influence of age, gender and Charlson co-morbidity score on these outcomes. We identified 14777 adult patients over a 54-month period (April 2007-September 2011) that met our linkage and inclusion criteria (isolated, unilateral closed ankle fracture that did not require hospitalisation). Mean age was 46.4 years (range 18-99) and the majority had a Charlson 0 score (97.7%). There were 32 (0.22%) PEs within 90 days of the fracture (including in one patient who subsequently died). After adjustment, Charlson score of ≥1 was associated with a greater risk of PE (Odds ratio = 11.97, p < 0.001) compared to Charlson 0. Risk for these patients was 2.08%. In total, fifteen patients (0.11%) died in hospital within 90 days. Pulmonary embolism is rare following ankle fractures treated without an operation. Patients with multiple co-morbidities are at a higher risk. Based on this evidence, an ankle fracture treated without an operation does not appear to be an indication for routine VTE prophylaxis.

Research paper thumbnail of Consultant and trainee attitudes towards supervision of operative procedures in the UK and Ireland

The e-logbook is used to monitor progression through training and to assess training within teach... more The e-logbook is used to monitor progression through training and to assess training within teaching units. We document consultant and trainee opinions with regards to supervision status, and to inform guidelines for trainees and trainers using the e-logbook. A questionnaire was sent to consultants and trainees in the UK and Ireland. Eight theatre scenarios were described and respondents were asked to state what they felt was the appropriate supervision status for the trainee. Significantly more consultants in the UK use the e-logbook than those based in Ireland (58.5%:14.5%). There were differences in consensus response to the scenarios between consultants and trainees, and between Irish and UK based surgeons. We have documented the opinions of consultants and trainees from across the UK and Ireland with regards to supervision status for trainees under certain theatre situations. This information should support formal guidelines for all users of the logbook.

Research paper thumbnail of Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals

Bone & joint research, 2013

The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better unde... more The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245-7.

Research paper thumbnail of The orthopaedic research scene and strategies to improve it

The Bone & Joint Journal, 2014

Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproporti... more Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproportionately small fraction of available national and international funding for health research. With the burden of musculoskeletal disease increasing, high-quality research is required to improve the evidence base for orthopaedic practice. Using the current research landscape in the United Kingdom as an example, but also addressing the international perspective, we highlight the issues surrounding poor levels of research funding in trauma and orthopaedics and indicate avenues for improving the impact and success of surgical musculoskeletal research.

Research paper thumbnail of Of dogs and men: Comparative biology as a tool for the discovery of novel biomarkers and drug development targets in osteosarcoma

Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2012

The similarities between human and canine osteosarcoma with regard to histology, biological behav... more The similarities between human and canine osteosarcoma with regard to histology, biological behavior and molecular genetic alterations suggest that the dog provides a supplementary model for the development and preclinical testing of novel therapeutics. Counter intuitively, careful examination of the differences between OS in the two species may also be rewarding in terms of increasing our understanding of the pathogenesis of this cancer. This review will discuss the arguments in favor of the "dog model" and outline how the evaluation of treatment strategies in dogs has indicated avenues for improvement of protocols for human patients.

Research paper thumbnail of Characterisation of the cartilage DNA methylome in knee and hip osteoarthritis using high-density genome-wide analysis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of Expression analysis of osteoarthritis associated genes in mesenchymal stem cells differentiating into joint-associated cells

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of A Novel in Vitro Model to Investigate Behavior of Articular Chondrocytes in Osteoarthritis

The Journal of Rheumatology, 2010

To investigate in vivo simulation of the microenvironment in which osteoarthritis (OA) chondrocyt... more To investigate in vivo simulation of the microenvironment in which osteoarthritis (OA) chondrocytes are cultured in vitro. Human articular chondrocytes were cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Cells were cultured on standard culture plastic or a porous polyHEMA surface that closely resembles the in vivo cartilage microarchitecture. Morphological changes to the cells were demonstrated by fluorescent staining with DAPI and vinculin. Proteoglycan and type II collagen protein levels were assessed using established techniques. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) production was assessed by ELISA. The gene expression of type II collagen and SOX9 was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cells grown on culture plastic were seen to be flat and hexagonal. Cells cultured on the porous polyHEMA surface exhibited morphology in keeping with the in vivo microenvironment. Glycosaminoglycan release in hypoxia was high from cells cultured on standard culture plastic. Transcriptional expression of type II collagen was upregulated in hypoxia and by culture on the polyHEMA surface. Transcriptional expression of SOX9 in hypoxia was upregulated compared to normoxia; no significant effect was seen by varying the culture surface. Translational expression of type II collagen was upregulated at 20% oxygen on the polyHEMA surface compared to culture plastic and this was related to MMP-1 expression. Culture of chondrocytes in hypoxia and on a porous surface simulates the in vivo microenvironment and illustrates the molecular mechanisms of OA.

Research paper thumbnail of Skin moisturisers and surgical site preparation: a slippery problem?

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2007

Research paper thumbnail of Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?

International Orthopaedics, 2014

Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with clai... more Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with claims of clinical and scientific fact. Since the last assessment of the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements ten years ago, there have been legislative changes and media scrutiny which have shaped this practice. The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate these claims. Fifty claims from 50 advertisements were chosen randomly from six highly respected peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals (published July-December 2011). The evidence supporting each claim was assessed and validated by three orthopaedic surgeons. The assessors, blinded to product and company, rated the evidence and answered the following questions: Does the evidence as presented support the claim made in the advertisement and what is the quality of that evidence? Is the claim supported by enough evidence to influence your own clinical practice? Twenty-eight claims cited evidence from published literature, four from public presentations, 11 from manufacturer "data held on file" and seven had no supporting evidence. Only 12 claims were considered to have high-quality evidence and only 11 were considered well supported. A strong correlation was seen between the quality of evidence and strength of support (Spearman r = 0.945, p < 0.0001). The average ICC between the assessors' ratings was strong (r = 0.85) giving validity to the results. Orthopaedic surgeons must remain sceptical about the claims made in print advertisements. High-quality evidence is required by orthopaedic surgeons to influence clinical practice and this evidence should be sought by manufacturers wishing to market a successful product.

Research paper thumbnail of Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties

International Orthopaedics, 2013

The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the futu... more The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the future of orthopaedic research funding. We aim to characterise the trend in journal IF over the last decade and draw comparisons with other surgical specialties. We conducted an analysis of impact factors from Journal Citation Reports between 2000 and 2010. Between 2000 and 2010 the number of orthopaedic journals increased from 24 to 41, more than any other surgical specialty and the mean IF increased from 0.842 to 1.400. Journals printed in the English language had a significantly higher IF in the year 2010 (1.64 vs. 0.33, p = 0.01) than those printed in other languages. English language journals published in the US had significantly higher mean 2010 IF (1.932 vs. 1.243, p = 0.025) than those published in Europe, and this had changed compared with 2000 mean IF (0.978 Vs. 0.704, p = 0.360). Orthopaedics was ranked sixth out of 11 surgical subspecialties in 2000 but dropped to seventh out of 11 in 2010. The quality of orthopaedic journals has significantly increased over the last decade and this has been accompanied by a rise in mean IF. It is important that orthopaedics continues to improve the quality of research, which may help orthopaedic researchers secure funding in the future.

Research paper thumbnail of Common peroneal and posterior tibial ischemic nerve damage, a rare cause

Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2010

Research paper thumbnail of Floppy Lateral Position: Technique Tip

Foot & Ankle International, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Technique for shoulder ultrasonography in infants with congenital brachial plexus palsy

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Pulmonary embolism following ankle fractures treated without an operation – An analysis using National Health Service data

Injury, 2014

The majority of ankle fractures are stable and can be treated without an operation, most commonly... more The majority of ankle fractures are stable and can be treated without an operation, most commonly with cast immobilisation. Based on concerns regarding the risk of a venous thromboembolic event (VTE) while immobilised, there is currently debate as to whether these patients should receive VTE prophylaxis for the duration of treatment. Rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) in this patient group are unknown. This retrospective cohort study was designed to identify patients treated without an operation for ankle fracture and determine the occurrence of PE and inpatient mortality within 90 days of injury using the English National Health Service administrative databases. Logistic regression models were used to assess the influence of age, gender and Charlson co-morbidity score on these outcomes. We identified 14777 adult patients over a 54-month period (April 2007-September 2011) that met our linkage and inclusion criteria (isolated, unilateral closed ankle fracture that did not require hospitalisation). Mean age was 46.4 years (range 18-99) and the majority had a Charlson 0 score (97.7%). There were 32 (0.22%) PEs within 90 days of the fracture (including in one patient who subsequently died). After adjustment, Charlson score of ≥1 was associated with a greater risk of PE (Odds ratio = 11.97, p < 0.001) compared to Charlson 0. Risk for these patients was 2.08%. In total, fifteen patients (0.11%) died in hospital within 90 days. Pulmonary embolism is rare following ankle fractures treated without an operation. Patients with multiple co-morbidities are at a higher risk. Based on this evidence, an ankle fracture treated without an operation does not appear to be an indication for routine VTE prophylaxis.