Mark Rosenzweig - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Mark Rosenzweig
Oxford University Press eBooks, May 1, 2015
Social Science Research Network, 2006
Journal of Political Economy, Mar 1, 2022
Social Science Research Network, 2013
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of t... more The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.
that may remain. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
This paper describes and implements a methodology for disentangling empirically in households the... more This paper describes and implements a methodology for disentangling empirically in households the bio10gically-determined supply of births from the demand for births in order to aasess the consequences of exogenous variations in fertility supply for household behavior. The estimation problems arising when there is heterogeneity both in preferences for family size and in the biological capacity to bear children (fecundity) are illustrated wjth a dynamic optimizing model incorporating stochastic fertility. The methodology is applied to monthly longitudinal data on contraceptive use, fertility, and female labor supply in the United States from 1970-75. The empirical results indicate that more than ten percent of the cross-sectional variation in the number of live births in the U.S. is due to interhousehold variation in the exogenous supply of births. Bio10gica11ydetermined fertility supply variation also significantly affects married women's labor supply and earnings. Moreover, use of actual fertility as a proxy for fertility supply results in underestimates of contraceptive effectiveness, and to biased estimates of the consequences of exogenous variations in fertility supply for couples' choice of contraceptives, for female earnings, and for the labor supply of married women.
Social Science Research Network, 2010
Note: Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and c... more Note: Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to Discussion Papers should be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers.
Journal of Political Economy, 1996
for comments on a preliminary draft. I have benefitted from the comments of participants at a num... more for comments on a preliminary draft. I have benefitted from the comments of participants at a number of seminars. Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. I thank ICRISAT for making the data available.
A model of human capital investment and activity choice is used to explain facts describing gende... more A model of human capital investment and activity choice is used to explain facts describing gender differentials in the levels and returns to human capital investments and occupational choice. These include the higher return to and level of schooling, the small effect of healthiness on wages, and the large effect of healthiness on schooling for females relative to males. The model incorporates gender differences in the level and responsiveness of brawn to nutrition in a Roy-economy setting in which activities reward skill and brawn differentially. Evidence from rural Bangladesh provides support for the model and the importance of the distribution of brawn.
The research for this paper is supported in part by grants NIH HD30907 and NSF SBR93-08405. We ar... more The research for this paper is supported in part by grants NIH HD30907 and NSF SBR93-08405. We are grateful to Tim Besley for comments on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.
Demography, 1986
This paper reports estimates of the total numbers of actual legal immigrants to the United States... more This paper reports estimates of the total numbers of actual legal immigrants to the United States that result from the family reunification provisions of U.S. immigration law. These immigration multipliers are estimated separately for major visa categories and by gender and are obtained in the context of an analysis of how individual characteristics of immigrants and their origin country conditions affect (a) the decision to migrate to the United States and (b) once admitted, their propensity to remain and to become U.S. citizens. The analyses combine longitudinal data on the 1971 cohort of legal immigrants and data from the 1970 Census Public Use Tapes. The results suggest that the actual multipliers differ importantly by visa category and that they are substantially lower than the potential multipliers and lower as well than previously supposed.
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, Sep 1, 2010
We use a model of human capital investment and activity choice to explain facts describing gender... more We use a model of human capital investment and activity choice to explain facts describing gender differentials in the levels and returns to human capital investments. These include the higher return to and level of schooling, the small effect of healthiness on wages, and the large effect of healthiness on schooling for females relative to males. The model incorporates gender differences in the level and responsiveness of brawn to nutrition in a Royeconomy setting in which activities reward skill and brawn differentially. Empirical evidence from rural Bangladesh provides support for the model and the importance of the distribution of brawn.
Oxford University Press eBooks, May 1, 2015
Social Science Research Network, 2006
Journal of Political Economy, Mar 1, 2022
Social Science Research Network, 2013
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of t... more The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.
that may remain. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
This paper describes and implements a methodology for disentangling empirically in households the... more This paper describes and implements a methodology for disentangling empirically in households the bio10gically-determined supply of births from the demand for births in order to aasess the consequences of exogenous variations in fertility supply for household behavior. The estimation problems arising when there is heterogeneity both in preferences for family size and in the biological capacity to bear children (fecundity) are illustrated wjth a dynamic optimizing model incorporating stochastic fertility. The methodology is applied to monthly longitudinal data on contraceptive use, fertility, and female labor supply in the United States from 1970-75. The empirical results indicate that more than ten percent of the cross-sectional variation in the number of live births in the U.S. is due to interhousehold variation in the exogenous supply of births. Bio10gica11ydetermined fertility supply variation also significantly affects married women's labor supply and earnings. Moreover, use of actual fertility as a proxy for fertility supply results in underestimates of contraceptive effectiveness, and to biased estimates of the consequences of exogenous variations in fertility supply for couples' choice of contraceptives, for female earnings, and for the labor supply of married women.
Social Science Research Network, 2010
Note: Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and c... more Note: Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to Discussion Papers should be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers.
Journal of Political Economy, 1996
for comments on a preliminary draft. I have benefitted from the comments of participants at a num... more for comments on a preliminary draft. I have benefitted from the comments of participants at a number of seminars. Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. I thank ICRISAT for making the data available.
A model of human capital investment and activity choice is used to explain facts describing gende... more A model of human capital investment and activity choice is used to explain facts describing gender differentials in the levels and returns to human capital investments and occupational choice. These include the higher return to and level of schooling, the small effect of healthiness on wages, and the large effect of healthiness on schooling for females relative to males. The model incorporates gender differences in the level and responsiveness of brawn to nutrition in a Roy-economy setting in which activities reward skill and brawn differentially. Evidence from rural Bangladesh provides support for the model and the importance of the distribution of brawn.
The research for this paper is supported in part by grants NIH HD30907 and NSF SBR93-08405. We ar... more The research for this paper is supported in part by grants NIH HD30907 and NSF SBR93-08405. We are grateful to Tim Besley for comments on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.
Demography, 1986
This paper reports estimates of the total numbers of actual legal immigrants to the United States... more This paper reports estimates of the total numbers of actual legal immigrants to the United States that result from the family reunification provisions of U.S. immigration law. These immigration multipliers are estimated separately for major visa categories and by gender and are obtained in the context of an analysis of how individual characteristics of immigrants and their origin country conditions affect (a) the decision to migrate to the United States and (b) once admitted, their propensity to remain and to become U.S. citizens. The analyses combine longitudinal data on the 1971 cohort of legal immigrants and data from the 1970 Census Public Use Tapes. The results suggest that the actual multipliers differ importantly by visa category and that they are substantially lower than the potential multipliers and lower as well than previously supposed.
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, Sep 1, 2010
We use a model of human capital investment and activity choice to explain facts describing gender... more We use a model of human capital investment and activity choice to explain facts describing gender differentials in the levels and returns to human capital investments. These include the higher return to and level of schooling, the small effect of healthiness on wages, and the large effect of healthiness on schooling for females relative to males. The model incorporates gender differences in the level and responsiveness of brawn to nutrition in a Royeconomy setting in which activities reward skill and brawn differentially. Empirical evidence from rural Bangladesh provides support for the model and the importance of the distribution of brawn.