Elisa Scarpelli - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Elisa Scarpelli
Biomedicines, May 29, 2024
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Journal of personalized medicine, Mar 27, 2024
Journal of personalized medicine, Jan 29, 2024
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dec 28, 2023
Background: Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) predominantly affects young women and is often diagnos... more Background: Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) predominantly affects young women and is often diagnosed at an early stage. BOT accounts for 15% of all epithelial tumors. In this regard, a minimally invasive surgical approach and the ability to preserve fertility, without increasing the incidence of recurrences or worsening the prognosis, are crucial. This review aims to provide an update on the role and indications of laparoscopic surgery in BOTs. Methods: The electronic research was performed on Pubmed, Medline, and Embase. Articles published in the last 20 years (2004-2023) were included, and the following keywords were used: 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'laparoscopic surgery', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'minimally invasive surgery', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'fertility sparing', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'recurrence' and 'Borderline ovarian tumor' and 'relapse'. The agreement about potential relevance was reached by consensus of the researchers and according to PRISMA statement guidelines. We thoroughly reviewed all bibliographies to assess the inclusion of any further eligible studies. We excluded studies that did not align with the study's objectives. Results: The electronic database search yielded 767 total studies. Of whom, 188 were published before 2004, 84 were case reports, and 45 were not in the English language. Of the remaining 450 studies, 148 were considered eligible for the study. We included 20 studies in this review. Conclusions: Despite the latest guidelines recommending an open approach for the treatment of BOT, the laparoscopic approach has gained popularity as a feasible and safe alternative. The use of an endo-bag, along with advanced laparoscopic skills, has made the minimally invasive approach increasingly safe, with oncological outcomes almost comparable to those of reference. Moreover, in the context of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), laparoscopy seems to be associated with improved obstetrical outcomes, without detrimental effects on overall survival and disease-free survival. Therefore, the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of BOT appears to be a safe and effective option, especially in the case of FSS.
TriNetX healthcare organization (HCO) networks in the US (TNX-US) and EMEA (TNX-EMEA) to analyze ... more TriNetX healthcare organization (HCO) networks in the US (TNX-US) and EMEA (TNX-EMEA) to analyze the impact of endometriosis as a risk factor for the development of EC. Methodology Using TriNetX Platform, we defined a cohort of 284,287 patients with endometriosis and at least 6 months of follow up at the HCO, 254,726 from TNX-US and 29,561 TNX-EMEA. Propensity score matching between these cohorts and the female control cohorts in each regional network was used to remove the possible confounding effects of age, body mass index (BMI), previous diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, breast cancer, other cancer of female genital organs or genetic susceptibility to cancer. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to compare the incidence of EC between the matched cohorts. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) of EC patients with previous endometriosis vs those without endometriosis patients after propensity score matching. The time window of observation in both analyses was 10 years.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Apr 8, 2022
Introduction: In the last decades, the introduction of laparoscopy and, more recently, of robotic... more Introduction: In the last decades, the introduction of laparoscopy and, more recently, of robotic surgery, offered new options for surgical treatment also in gynecological malignancies, as an alternative to open surgery. When considering the best surgical treatment option for gynecological malignancies, evidence about safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes must be taken into account, to offer the best treatment to the patient. The present review aims to provide an updated scenario over the available evidence in the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gynecological malignancies. Material and methods: An electronic search was performed using the following keywords: 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'gynecology', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'endometrial cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'ovarian cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'cervical cancer'. The agreement about potential relevance was reached by consensus of the researchers and according to PRISMA statement guidelines. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and original articles were included in the present review. Results: Fifty-eight studies were considered eligible for the study, 23 studies regarding MIS in endometrial cancer (EC), 19 studies on MIS in ovarian cancer (OC), and 16 studies regarding MIS in cervical cancer (CC). The total of patients enrolled was 180,057, 131,430 in the EC group, 23,774 in the OC groups, and 24,853 in the CC group. Conclusions: According to the available evidence and current clinical practice, MIS is undoubtedly the gold standard for early-stage EC treatment and may represent an acceptable option even in high-risk EC patients. Concerning OC, MIS is a safe and useful tool for staging purposes in advanced-stage disease, and a treatment option only in high volume centres with expert oncologic surgeons. On the contrary, MIS should be abandoned in the context of CC, exception made for well-selected patients, who received adequate counselling about current evidence.
Cervical cancer, Oct 1, 2022
methods were comparable in detecting tumor extension and equally good at detecting lymph node met... more methods were comparable in detecting tumor extension and equally good at detecting lymph node metastases and distant metastases. The radiologists experienced more certainty in analysing malignant lesions with the additional information of PET, however, the lesions were more easily defined on MRI.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Mar 23, 2023
Medicina-lithuania, Dec 18, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Medicina-lithuania, Apr 17, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Journal of Clinical Medicine, May 18, 2023
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Ovarian cancer, Oct 1, 2022
Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polyme... more Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib therapy has demonstrated efficacy in first-line (1L) maintenance for Breast Cancer gene mutated (BRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients in 2018 and in combination with bevacizumab for Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD+) AOC patients in 2020. This study describes biomarker testing and treatment patterns in a representative AOC patient sample. Methodology A retrospective observational study utilizing the electronic health record-derived de-identified US-based Flatiron Health database was performed including women aged 18 years at AOC diagnosis between July 2018 and December 2021 with 2 clinical visits. Patients were followed from diagnosis until 31 December 2021, cessation of dataset coverage, or death, whichever occurred first. Biomarker testing was defined as evidence of a test for BRCA or HRD.
PubMed, Nov 3, 2021
Background and aim: Ninety-four thousand gynecological cancer diagnoses are performed each year i... more Background and aim: Ninety-four thousand gynecological cancer diagnoses are performed each year in the United States. The majority of these tumors require systemic adjuvant therapy. Sustained venous access was overcome by indwelling long-term central venous catheter (CVC). The best choice of which CVC to use is often arbitrary or dependent on physician confidence. This meta-analysis aims to compare PORT and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) outcomes during adjuvant treatment for gynecological cancer. Methods: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement (PRISMA)were used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: 1320 patients were included, 794 belonging to the PORT group and 526 to the PICC group. Total complication rates were fewer in the PORT group, p = 0.05. CVC malfunction was less frequent in the PORT group than in the PICC group, p <0.01. Finally, thrombotic events were less expressed in the PORT group than in the PICC group, p = 0.02. No difference was found in operative complication, migration, malposition, extravasation, infection, and complication requiring catheter removal. Conclusions: PORT had fewer thrombotic complications and fewer malfunction problems than PICC devices. Unless specific contraindications, PORTs can be preferred for systemic treatment in gynecological cancer patients.
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) accounts for 15–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. Concerns hav... more Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) accounts for 15–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. Concerns have arisen about the clinical and prognostic implications of BOT with exophytic growth patterns. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of BOT patients surgically treated from 2015 to 2020. Patients were divided into an endophytic pattern (with intracystic tumor growth and intact ovarian capsule) and an exophytic pattern (with tumor growth outside the ovarian capsule) group. Among the 254 patients recruited, 229 met the inclusion criteria, and of these, 169 (73.8%) belonged to the endophytic group. The endophytic group showed more commonly an early FIGO stage than the exophytic group (100.0% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, tumor cells in peritoneal washing (20.0% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), elevated Ca125 levels (51.7% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.003), peritoneal implants (0 vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and invasive peritoneal implants (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.003) were more frequently observed in the exophy...
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Mar 23, 2023
Ovarian cancer
Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polyme... more Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib therapy has demonstrated efficacy in first-line (1L) maintenance for Breast Cancer gene mutated (BRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients in 2018 and in combination with bevacizumab for Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD+) AOC patients in 2020. This study describes biomarker testing and treatment patterns in a representative AOC patient sample. Methodology A retrospective observational study utilizing the electronic health record-derived de-identified US-based Flatiron Health database was performed including women aged 18 years at AOC diagnosis between July 2018 and December 2021 with 2 clinical visits. Patients were followed from diagnosis until 31 December 2021, cessation of dataset coverage, or death, whichever occurred first. Biomarker testing was defined as evidence of a test for BRCA or HRD.
Biomedicines, May 29, 2024
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Journal of personalized medicine, Mar 27, 2024
Journal of personalized medicine, Jan 29, 2024
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dec 28, 2023
Background: Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) predominantly affects young women and is often diagnos... more Background: Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) predominantly affects young women and is often diagnosed at an early stage. BOT accounts for 15% of all epithelial tumors. In this regard, a minimally invasive surgical approach and the ability to preserve fertility, without increasing the incidence of recurrences or worsening the prognosis, are crucial. This review aims to provide an update on the role and indications of laparoscopic surgery in BOTs. Methods: The electronic research was performed on Pubmed, Medline, and Embase. Articles published in the last 20 years (2004-2023) were included, and the following keywords were used: 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'laparoscopic surgery', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'minimally invasive surgery', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'fertility sparing', 'borderline ovarian tumor' and 'recurrence' and 'Borderline ovarian tumor' and 'relapse'. The agreement about potential relevance was reached by consensus of the researchers and according to PRISMA statement guidelines. We thoroughly reviewed all bibliographies to assess the inclusion of any further eligible studies. We excluded studies that did not align with the study's objectives. Results: The electronic database search yielded 767 total studies. Of whom, 188 were published before 2004, 84 were case reports, and 45 were not in the English language. Of the remaining 450 studies, 148 were considered eligible for the study. We included 20 studies in this review. Conclusions: Despite the latest guidelines recommending an open approach for the treatment of BOT, the laparoscopic approach has gained popularity as a feasible and safe alternative. The use of an endo-bag, along with advanced laparoscopic skills, has made the minimally invasive approach increasingly safe, with oncological outcomes almost comparable to those of reference. Moreover, in the context of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), laparoscopy seems to be associated with improved obstetrical outcomes, without detrimental effects on overall survival and disease-free survival. Therefore, the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of BOT appears to be a safe and effective option, especially in the case of FSS.
TriNetX healthcare organization (HCO) networks in the US (TNX-US) and EMEA (TNX-EMEA) to analyze ... more TriNetX healthcare organization (HCO) networks in the US (TNX-US) and EMEA (TNX-EMEA) to analyze the impact of endometriosis as a risk factor for the development of EC. Methodology Using TriNetX Platform, we defined a cohort of 284,287 patients with endometriosis and at least 6 months of follow up at the HCO, 254,726 from TNX-US and 29,561 TNX-EMEA. Propensity score matching between these cohorts and the female control cohorts in each regional network was used to remove the possible confounding effects of age, body mass index (BMI), previous diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, breast cancer, other cancer of female genital organs or genetic susceptibility to cancer. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to compare the incidence of EC between the matched cohorts. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) of EC patients with previous endometriosis vs those without endometriosis patients after propensity score matching. The time window of observation in both analyses was 10 years.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Apr 8, 2022
Introduction: In the last decades, the introduction of laparoscopy and, more recently, of robotic... more Introduction: In the last decades, the introduction of laparoscopy and, more recently, of robotic surgery, offered new options for surgical treatment also in gynecological malignancies, as an alternative to open surgery. When considering the best surgical treatment option for gynecological malignancies, evidence about safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes must be taken into account, to offer the best treatment to the patient. The present review aims to provide an updated scenario over the available evidence in the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gynecological malignancies. Material and methods: An electronic search was performed using the following keywords: 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'gynecology', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'endometrial cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'ovarian cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery' and 'cervical cancer'. The agreement about potential relevance was reached by consensus of the researchers and according to PRISMA statement guidelines. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and original articles were included in the present review. Results: Fifty-eight studies were considered eligible for the study, 23 studies regarding MIS in endometrial cancer (EC), 19 studies on MIS in ovarian cancer (OC), and 16 studies regarding MIS in cervical cancer (CC). The total of patients enrolled was 180,057, 131,430 in the EC group, 23,774 in the OC groups, and 24,853 in the CC group. Conclusions: According to the available evidence and current clinical practice, MIS is undoubtedly the gold standard for early-stage EC treatment and may represent an acceptable option even in high-risk EC patients. Concerning OC, MIS is a safe and useful tool for staging purposes in advanced-stage disease, and a treatment option only in high volume centres with expert oncologic surgeons. On the contrary, MIS should be abandoned in the context of CC, exception made for well-selected patients, who received adequate counselling about current evidence.
Cervical cancer, Oct 1, 2022
methods were comparable in detecting tumor extension and equally good at detecting lymph node met... more methods were comparable in detecting tumor extension and equally good at detecting lymph node metastases and distant metastases. The radiologists experienced more certainty in analysing malignant lesions with the additional information of PET, however, the lesions were more easily defined on MRI.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Mar 23, 2023
Medicina-lithuania, Dec 18, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Medicina-lithuania, Apr 17, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Journal of Clinical Medicine, May 18, 2023
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative... more This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Ovarian cancer, Oct 1, 2022
Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polyme... more Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib therapy has demonstrated efficacy in first-line (1L) maintenance for Breast Cancer gene mutated (BRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients in 2018 and in combination with bevacizumab for Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD+) AOC patients in 2020. This study describes biomarker testing and treatment patterns in a representative AOC patient sample. Methodology A retrospective observational study utilizing the electronic health record-derived de-identified US-based Flatiron Health database was performed including women aged 18 years at AOC diagnosis between July 2018 and December 2021 with 2 clinical visits. Patients were followed from diagnosis until 31 December 2021, cessation of dataset coverage, or death, whichever occurred first. Biomarker testing was defined as evidence of a test for BRCA or HRD.
PubMed, Nov 3, 2021
Background and aim: Ninety-four thousand gynecological cancer diagnoses are performed each year i... more Background and aim: Ninety-four thousand gynecological cancer diagnoses are performed each year in the United States. The majority of these tumors require systemic adjuvant therapy. Sustained venous access was overcome by indwelling long-term central venous catheter (CVC). The best choice of which CVC to use is often arbitrary or dependent on physician confidence. This meta-analysis aims to compare PORT and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) outcomes during adjuvant treatment for gynecological cancer. Methods: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement (PRISMA)were used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: 1320 patients were included, 794 belonging to the PORT group and 526 to the PICC group. Total complication rates were fewer in the PORT group, p = 0.05. CVC malfunction was less frequent in the PORT group than in the PICC group, p <0.01. Finally, thrombotic events were less expressed in the PORT group than in the PICC group, p = 0.02. No difference was found in operative complication, migration, malposition, extravasation, infection, and complication requiring catheter removal. Conclusions: PORT had fewer thrombotic complications and fewer malfunction problems than PICC devices. Unless specific contraindications, PORTs can be preferred for systemic treatment in gynecological cancer patients.
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) accounts for 15–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. Concerns hav... more Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) accounts for 15–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. Concerns have arisen about the clinical and prognostic implications of BOT with exophytic growth patterns. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of BOT patients surgically treated from 2015 to 2020. Patients were divided into an endophytic pattern (with intracystic tumor growth and intact ovarian capsule) and an exophytic pattern (with tumor growth outside the ovarian capsule) group. Among the 254 patients recruited, 229 met the inclusion criteria, and of these, 169 (73.8%) belonged to the endophytic group. The endophytic group showed more commonly an early FIGO stage than the exophytic group (100.0% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, tumor cells in peritoneal washing (20.0% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), elevated Ca125 levels (51.7% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.003), peritoneal implants (0 vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and invasive peritoneal implants (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.003) were more frequently observed in the exophy...
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Mar 23, 2023
Ovarian cancer
Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polyme... more Introduction/Background With the approval of the first poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib therapy has demonstrated efficacy in first-line (1L) maintenance for Breast Cancer gene mutated (BRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients in 2018 and in combination with bevacizumab for Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD+) AOC patients in 2020. This study describes biomarker testing and treatment patterns in a representative AOC patient sample. Methodology A retrospective observational study utilizing the electronic health record-derived de-identified US-based Flatiron Health database was performed including women aged 18 years at AOC diagnosis between July 2018 and December 2021 with 2 clinical visits. Patients were followed from diagnosis until 31 December 2021, cessation of dataset coverage, or death, whichever occurred first. Biomarker testing was defined as evidence of a test for BRCA or HRD.