Sean Young - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Sean Young
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Background: Fluoropyrimidine toxicity is often due to variations in the gene (DPYD) encoding dihy... more Background: Fluoropyrimidine toxicity is often due to variations in the gene (DPYD) encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). DPYD genotyping can be used to adjust doses to reduce the likelihood of fluoropyrimidine toxicity while maintaining therapeutically effective drug levels.Methods: A multiplex QPCR assay was locally developed to allow genotyping for six DPYD variants. The test was offered prospectively for all patients starting on fluoropyrimidines at the BC Cancer Centre in Vancouver and then across B.C., Canada as well as retrospectively for patients suspected to have had an adverse reaction to therapy. Dose adjustments were made for variant carriers. The incidence of toxicity in the first three cycles was compared between DPYD variant allele carriers and non-variant carriers. Subsequent to an initial implementation phase, this test was made available province-wide.Results: In 9 months, 186 patients were tested and 14 were found to be heterozygous variant carriers. Flu...
European Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
Translational Lung Cancer Research
Background: EGFR T790M testing is the standard of care for activating EGFR mutation (EGFRm) nonsm... more Background: EGFR T790M testing is the standard of care for activating EGFR mutation (EGFRm) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on 1st/2nd generation TKIs to select patients for osimertinib. Despite sensitive assays, detection of circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) is variable and influenced by clinical factors. The number and location of sites of progressive disease at time of testing were reviewed to explore the effect on EGFR ctDNA detection. The prognostic value of EGFR ctDNA detection on survival outcomes was assessed. Methods: Following extraction of cell-free DNA from plasma using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit, custom droplet digital polymerase chair reaction (ddPCR) assays were used to assess EGFR ctDNA using the Bio-Rad QX200 system. The ddPCR assay has a limit of detection of ≤0.15% variant allele fraction. Baseline characteristics and imaging reports at time of EGFR ctDNA testing were reviewed retrospectively for a 1 year period. Results: The study included 177 patients who had an EGFR ctDNA test. Liver (aOR 3.13) or bone (aOR 2.76) progression or 3-5 sites of progression (aOR 2.22) were predictive of EGFR ctDNA detection. The median OS from first ctDNA test after multiple testing iterations was 12.3 m undetectable EGFR ctDNA, 7.6 m for original EGFR mutation only and 24.1 m with T790M (P=0.001). Conclusions: Patients with liver or bone progression and 3-5 progressing sites are more likely to have informative EGFR ctDNA testing. Detection of EGFR ctDNA is a negative prognostic indicator in the absence of a T790M resistance mutation, potentially reflecting the disease burden in the absence of targeted therapy options.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
e13021 Background: Multi-gene panel tumour testing (TT) has been available in British Columbia si... more e13021 Background: Multi-gene panel tumour testing (TT) has been available in British Columbia since mid-2016 for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), melanoma (MEL), low-grade glioma (LGG), and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST). TT can detect somatic driver mutations and potential pathogenic germline variants (pPGVs) associated with hereditary cancer susceptibility. We reviewed the frequency of pPGVs identified by TT and examined referral rates to the Hereditary Cancer Program (HCP) for confirmatory germline testing (GT) and therapeutic implications of PGV findings. Methods: All patients (pts) undergoing TT testing from October 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were identified. Diagnosis, age, gender, family history and treatment data were obtained. TT was performed by next-generation sequencing for all/selected regions of the following genes: AKT1, ALK, BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2, CCND1, CCND3, CIC, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, FUBP1, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, KRA...
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, Mar 20, 2017
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a national program for Canadian diagnostic labora... more PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a national program for Canadian diagnostic laboratories to compare DNA-variant interpretations and resolve discordant-variant classifications using the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a case study.MethodsBRCA1 and BRCA2 variant data were uploaded and shared through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR; http://www.opengenetics.ca). A total of 5,554 variant observations were submitted; classification differences were identified and comparison reports were sent to participating laboratories. Each site had the opportunity to reclassify variants. The data were analyzed before and after the comparison report process to track concordant- or discordant-variant classifications by three different models.ResultsVariant-discordance rates varied by classification model: 38.9% of variants were discordant when using a five-tier model, 26.7% with a three-tier model, and 5.0% with a two-tier model. After the comparison report process, the proportion of...
Cancer Research, 2016
Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in the DNA repair glycosylase, MUTYH, cause MUTYH-associat... more Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in the DNA repair glycosylase, MUTYH, cause MUTYH-associated polyposis, characterised by an increased susceptibility to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas secondary to defective base excision repair. We report a patient diagnosed with Stage IIB distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the age of 45 years. Prior colonoscopy and gastroscopy noted three colonic tubular adenomas and a gastric fundic gland polyp. The patient was consented to whole genome and transcriptome sequencing of the PDAC and matched normal blood DNA through the British Columbia Personalized Onco-Genomics (POG) program. Analysis of germline and somatic variants including single nucleotide variants, copy number determination, loss of heterozygosity detection and mutational signatures was undertaken. Expression fold-changes were calculated against Illumina BodyMap pancreatic tissue averages and compared against The Cancer Genome Atlas PDAC cases. Germline analysis revealed biallelic mutations in the MUTYH gene. In light of this patient9s personal and family history of adenomatous colon polyps, clinic-initiated panel testing of 14 cancer susceptibility genes, including MUTYH, via Illumina sequencing with reflex Sanger confirmation revealed the same biallelic MUTYH changes. Analysis of the patient9s PDAC revealed a base excision repair pathway signature, demonstrated by an increased frequency of C:G>A:T transversions, consistent with deficient MUTYH activity. This is the first association of germline MUTYH biallelic pathogenic variants with PDAC and provides evidence of the contribution of aberrant MUTYH function to the genomic landscape of a PDAC. Detection of the base excision repair mutational signature may be a sensitive way to screen tumors for aberrant MUTYH function that can reveal potential germline MUTYH-related cancer susceptibility, and allow inference of pathogenicity of detected MUTYH variants, which may have cancer prevention and therapeutic implications. Citation Format: Kasmintan A. Schrader, Carolyn Chu’ng, Eric Zhao, Hui-li Wong, Yaoqing Shen, Martin Jones, Tom Thomson, Howard Lim, Sean Young, Carol Cremin, Robert Holt, Peter Eirew, Joanna Karasinska, Jacquie Schein, Yongjun Zhao, Andy Mungall, Richard Moore, Yussanne Ma, Alexandra Fok, Robyn Roscoe, Stephen Yip, Gillian Mitchell, Aly Karsan, Steven Jones, David Schaeffer, Janessa Laskin, Marco Marra, Daniel Renouf. Genomic analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient with MUTYH-associated polyposis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5226.
Leukemia & Lymphoma, 2013
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital and University of B... more 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and 3 Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia, Division of Hematology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia Cancer Agency, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
British Journal of Haematology, 2012
Mammalian Genome, 1999
We report the genomic organization, mapping, and tissue distribution of the human inhibitors of a... more We report the genomic organization, mapping, and tissue distribution of the human inhibitors of apoptosis, HIAP1 and HIAP2. HIAP1 is 8.7 kb in length and is contained within eight coding and two non-coding (5'UTR) exons. The 4.5-kb HIAP2 message is contained within eight coding region exons and a single 5'UTR exon. The HIAP1 and HIAP2 genes lie in tandem on Chromosome (Chr) 11 (q22-23) with the intergenic distance being approximately 7 kb. The tissue distributions of HIAP1 and HIAP2 appear similar although the relative expression of HIAP1 is generally higher. Expression is highest in the kidney, small intestine, liver, and lung and lowest in tissues of the central nervous system.
Molecular Case Studies
We report a case of early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient harboring biallelic... more We report a case of early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient harboring biallelic MUTYH germline mutations, whose tumor featured somatic mutational signatures consistent with defective MUTYH-mediated base excision repair and the associated driver KRAS transversion mutation p.Gly12Cys. Analysis of an additional 730 advanced cancer cases (N = 731) was undertaken to determine whether the mutational signatures were also present in tumors from germline MUTYH heterozygote carriers or if instead the signatures were only seen in those with biallelic loss of function. We identified two patients with breast cancer each carrying a pathogenic germline MUTYH variant with a somatic MUTYH copy loss leading to the germline variant being homozygous in the tumor and demonstrating the same somatic signatures. Our results suggest that monoallelic inactivation of MUTYH is not sufficient for C:G>A:T transversion signatures previously linked to MUTYH
BMC Cancer, 2008
Background: Subclassification of ovarian carcinomas can be used to guide treatment and determine ... more Background: Subclassification of ovarian carcinomas can be used to guide treatment and determine prognosis. Germline and somatic mutations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and epigenetic events such as promoter hypermethylation can lead to decreased expression of BRCA1/ 2 in ovarian cancers. The mechanism of BRCA1/2 loss is a potential method of subclassifying high grade serous carcinomas.
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Background: Fluoropyrimidine toxicity is often due to variations in the gene (DPYD) encoding dihy... more Background: Fluoropyrimidine toxicity is often due to variations in the gene (DPYD) encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). DPYD genotyping can be used to adjust doses to reduce the likelihood of fluoropyrimidine toxicity while maintaining therapeutically effective drug levels.Methods: A multiplex QPCR assay was locally developed to allow genotyping for six DPYD variants. The test was offered prospectively for all patients starting on fluoropyrimidines at the BC Cancer Centre in Vancouver and then across B.C., Canada as well as retrospectively for patients suspected to have had an adverse reaction to therapy. Dose adjustments were made for variant carriers. The incidence of toxicity in the first three cycles was compared between DPYD variant allele carriers and non-variant carriers. Subsequent to an initial implementation phase, this test was made available province-wide.Results: In 9 months, 186 patients were tested and 14 were found to be heterozygous variant carriers. Flu...
European Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
Translational Lung Cancer Research
Background: EGFR T790M testing is the standard of care for activating EGFR mutation (EGFRm) nonsm... more Background: EGFR T790M testing is the standard of care for activating EGFR mutation (EGFRm) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on 1st/2nd generation TKIs to select patients for osimertinib. Despite sensitive assays, detection of circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) is variable and influenced by clinical factors. The number and location of sites of progressive disease at time of testing were reviewed to explore the effect on EGFR ctDNA detection. The prognostic value of EGFR ctDNA detection on survival outcomes was assessed. Methods: Following extraction of cell-free DNA from plasma using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit, custom droplet digital polymerase chair reaction (ddPCR) assays were used to assess EGFR ctDNA using the Bio-Rad QX200 system. The ddPCR assay has a limit of detection of ≤0.15% variant allele fraction. Baseline characteristics and imaging reports at time of EGFR ctDNA testing were reviewed retrospectively for a 1 year period. Results: The study included 177 patients who had an EGFR ctDNA test. Liver (aOR 3.13) or bone (aOR 2.76) progression or 3-5 sites of progression (aOR 2.22) were predictive of EGFR ctDNA detection. The median OS from first ctDNA test after multiple testing iterations was 12.3 m undetectable EGFR ctDNA, 7.6 m for original EGFR mutation only and 24.1 m with T790M (P=0.001). Conclusions: Patients with liver or bone progression and 3-5 progressing sites are more likely to have informative EGFR ctDNA testing. Detection of EGFR ctDNA is a negative prognostic indicator in the absence of a T790M resistance mutation, potentially reflecting the disease burden in the absence of targeted therapy options.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
e13021 Background: Multi-gene panel tumour testing (TT) has been available in British Columbia si... more e13021 Background: Multi-gene panel tumour testing (TT) has been available in British Columbia since mid-2016 for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), melanoma (MEL), low-grade glioma (LGG), and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST). TT can detect somatic driver mutations and potential pathogenic germline variants (pPGVs) associated with hereditary cancer susceptibility. We reviewed the frequency of pPGVs identified by TT and examined referral rates to the Hereditary Cancer Program (HCP) for confirmatory germline testing (GT) and therapeutic implications of PGV findings. Methods: All patients (pts) undergoing TT testing from October 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were identified. Diagnosis, age, gender, family history and treatment data were obtained. TT was performed by next-generation sequencing for all/selected regions of the following genes: AKT1, ALK, BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2, CCND1, CCND3, CIC, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, FUBP1, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, KRA...
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, Mar 20, 2017
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a national program for Canadian diagnostic labora... more PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a national program for Canadian diagnostic laboratories to compare DNA-variant interpretations and resolve discordant-variant classifications using the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a case study.MethodsBRCA1 and BRCA2 variant data were uploaded and shared through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR; http://www.opengenetics.ca). A total of 5,554 variant observations were submitted; classification differences were identified and comparison reports were sent to participating laboratories. Each site had the opportunity to reclassify variants. The data were analyzed before and after the comparison report process to track concordant- or discordant-variant classifications by three different models.ResultsVariant-discordance rates varied by classification model: 38.9% of variants were discordant when using a five-tier model, 26.7% with a three-tier model, and 5.0% with a two-tier model. After the comparison report process, the proportion of...
Cancer Research, 2016
Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in the DNA repair glycosylase, MUTYH, cause MUTYH-associat... more Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in the DNA repair glycosylase, MUTYH, cause MUTYH-associated polyposis, characterised by an increased susceptibility to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas secondary to defective base excision repair. We report a patient diagnosed with Stage IIB distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the age of 45 years. Prior colonoscopy and gastroscopy noted three colonic tubular adenomas and a gastric fundic gland polyp. The patient was consented to whole genome and transcriptome sequencing of the PDAC and matched normal blood DNA through the British Columbia Personalized Onco-Genomics (POG) program. Analysis of germline and somatic variants including single nucleotide variants, copy number determination, loss of heterozygosity detection and mutational signatures was undertaken. Expression fold-changes were calculated against Illumina BodyMap pancreatic tissue averages and compared against The Cancer Genome Atlas PDAC cases. Germline analysis revealed biallelic mutations in the MUTYH gene. In light of this patient9s personal and family history of adenomatous colon polyps, clinic-initiated panel testing of 14 cancer susceptibility genes, including MUTYH, via Illumina sequencing with reflex Sanger confirmation revealed the same biallelic MUTYH changes. Analysis of the patient9s PDAC revealed a base excision repair pathway signature, demonstrated by an increased frequency of C:G>A:T transversions, consistent with deficient MUTYH activity. This is the first association of germline MUTYH biallelic pathogenic variants with PDAC and provides evidence of the contribution of aberrant MUTYH function to the genomic landscape of a PDAC. Detection of the base excision repair mutational signature may be a sensitive way to screen tumors for aberrant MUTYH function that can reveal potential germline MUTYH-related cancer susceptibility, and allow inference of pathogenicity of detected MUTYH variants, which may have cancer prevention and therapeutic implications. Citation Format: Kasmintan A. Schrader, Carolyn Chu’ng, Eric Zhao, Hui-li Wong, Yaoqing Shen, Martin Jones, Tom Thomson, Howard Lim, Sean Young, Carol Cremin, Robert Holt, Peter Eirew, Joanna Karasinska, Jacquie Schein, Yongjun Zhao, Andy Mungall, Richard Moore, Yussanne Ma, Alexandra Fok, Robyn Roscoe, Stephen Yip, Gillian Mitchell, Aly Karsan, Steven Jones, David Schaeffer, Janessa Laskin, Marco Marra, Daniel Renouf. Genomic analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient with MUTYH-associated polyposis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5226.
Leukemia & Lymphoma, 2013
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital and University of B... more 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and 3 Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia, Division of Hematology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia Cancer Agency, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
British Journal of Haematology, 2012
Mammalian Genome, 1999
We report the genomic organization, mapping, and tissue distribution of the human inhibitors of a... more We report the genomic organization, mapping, and tissue distribution of the human inhibitors of apoptosis, HIAP1 and HIAP2. HIAP1 is 8.7 kb in length and is contained within eight coding and two non-coding (5'UTR) exons. The 4.5-kb HIAP2 message is contained within eight coding region exons and a single 5'UTR exon. The HIAP1 and HIAP2 genes lie in tandem on Chromosome (Chr) 11 (q22-23) with the intergenic distance being approximately 7 kb. The tissue distributions of HIAP1 and HIAP2 appear similar although the relative expression of HIAP1 is generally higher. Expression is highest in the kidney, small intestine, liver, and lung and lowest in tissues of the central nervous system.
Molecular Case Studies
We report a case of early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient harboring biallelic... more We report a case of early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient harboring biallelic MUTYH germline mutations, whose tumor featured somatic mutational signatures consistent with defective MUTYH-mediated base excision repair and the associated driver KRAS transversion mutation p.Gly12Cys. Analysis of an additional 730 advanced cancer cases (N = 731) was undertaken to determine whether the mutational signatures were also present in tumors from germline MUTYH heterozygote carriers or if instead the signatures were only seen in those with biallelic loss of function. We identified two patients with breast cancer each carrying a pathogenic germline MUTYH variant with a somatic MUTYH copy loss leading to the germline variant being homozygous in the tumor and demonstrating the same somatic signatures. Our results suggest that monoallelic inactivation of MUTYH is not sufficient for C:G>A:T transversion signatures previously linked to MUTYH
BMC Cancer, 2008
Background: Subclassification of ovarian carcinomas can be used to guide treatment and determine ... more Background: Subclassification of ovarian carcinomas can be used to guide treatment and determine prognosis. Germline and somatic mutations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and epigenetic events such as promoter hypermethylation can lead to decreased expression of BRCA1/ 2 in ovarian cancers. The mechanism of BRCA1/2 loss is a potential method of subclassifying high grade serous carcinomas.