Seda Kotan - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Seda Kotan
Eastern Journal of Medicine, 2020
Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions is difficult anomalies in orthodontics. The treatmen... more Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions is difficult anomalies in orthodontics. The treatment of skeletal Class II anomalies varies according to the jaw and the growth period of the anomalies. Adult individuals whose growth is over are treated with fixed orthodontic mechanics or orthognathic surgical approaches. If skeletal class II anomaly is not severe and does not constitute a problem aesthetically, camouflage treatment can be done with fixed orthodontic mechanics. This case report presents the results of orthodontic camouflage treatment and treatment applied to a skeletal Class II malocclusion female patient with chronological age of 18 years and skeletally in the Ru period. The molar relationship of the patient with a slightly convex profile is Angle Class II. In cephalometric examination, skeletal class II problem was detected (ANBº = 6º). At the end of the treatment, angle class II relation in the molar region, angle class I relation in the canine region and a smooth soft tissue profile were obtained.
Aydın dental, 2015
Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in ortho... more Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as (p<0.05). Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50% (n=25) of which were applied piezo surgery and 50% (n=25) of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster (p>0.05). The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied (p=0.001; p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture (p>0.05). According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Nov 14, 2022
Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in ortho... more Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as (p<0.05). Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50% (n=25) of which were applied piezo surgery and 50% (n=25) of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster (p>0.05). The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied (p=0.001; p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture (p>0.05). According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Nov 14, 2022
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020
Eastern Journal of Medicine, 2020
Eastern Journal of Medicine, 2020
Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions is difficult anomalies in orthodontics. The treatmen... more Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions is difficult anomalies in orthodontics. The treatment of skeletal Class II anomalies varies according to the jaw and the growth period of the anomalies. Adult individuals whose growth is over are treated with fixed orthodontic mechanics or orthognathic surgical approaches. If skeletal class II anomaly is not severe and does not constitute a problem aesthetically, camouflage treatment can be done with fixed orthodontic mechanics. This case report presents the results of orthodontic camouflage treatment and treatment applied to a skeletal Class II malocclusion female patient with chronological age of 18 years and skeletally in the Ru period. The molar relationship of the patient with a slightly convex profile is Angle Class II. In cephalometric examination, skeletal class II problem was detected (ANBº = 6º). At the end of the treatment, angle class II relation in the molar region, angle class I relation in the canine region and a smooth soft tissue profile were obtained.
Aydın dental, 2015
Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in ortho... more Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as (p<0.05). Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50% (n=25) of which were applied piezo surgery and 50% (n=25) of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster (p>0.05). The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied (p=0.001; p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture (p>0.05). According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Nov 14, 2022
Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in ortho... more Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methods in orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as (p<0.05). Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50% (n=25) of which were applied piezo surgery and 50% (n=25) of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster (p>0.05). The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied (p=0.001; p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture (p>0.05). According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Nov 14, 2022
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
1st International Dental Research and Health Sciences Congress, May 19, 2021
Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020
Eastern Journal of Medicine, 2020