Sercan Gürler - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Sercan Gürler

On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2017

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Dec 1, 2016

Kurucu iktidar, Turk anayasa literaturunde cogunlukla ongorulemezlik, bilinemezlik, denetlenemezl... more Kurucu iktidar, Turk anayasa literaturunde cogunlukla ongorulemezlik, bilinemezlik, denetlenemezlik, sinirsizlik ve hukuk disilik gibi sifatlarla tavsif edildiginden pek uzerinde durulmayan, gormezden gelinen bir kavram olagelmistir. Hâlbuki hem ozel olarak anayasa teorisinin hem de genel hukuk felsefesinin en onemli konulari arasinda kurucu iktidar da yer alir. Bu anlamda kurucu iktidar sadece anayasayi yapan bir iktidar degil, toplumlarin bir siyasi birlige nasil donustugu, bir siyasi birlik olarak kendi kendisini nasil yonettigi, varlik sebebi ve siniri gibi meselelerin felsefi acidan incelenmesinde vazgecilmez bir kavramdir. Nitekim O. Vahdet Issevenler de Kurucu Iktidar (Anayasanin Maddi ve Fail Nedeni) isimli kitabinda Sokratik gelenekte karsimiza cikan “Nedenler Teorisi”ne basvurmak suretiyle kurucu iktidarin dogasi, niteligi ve islevi, anayasa ile iliskisi meselelerini “onto-teleolojik” bakisla ele aliyor ve kurucu iktidarin aslinda bir “taninma” iliskisine dayandigini, beli...

Annales De La Faculte De Droit D Istanbul, 2008

At first sight, the law seems to be a system of rules and the judges only adjudicators who work w... more At first sight, the law seems to be a system of rules and the judges only adjudicators who work within the mechanism of that system. That is, they make a decision about disputes only by using some basic logical equipment in order to apply some written laws. This means that there is a determinacy in the law and that rules determine the outcomes in every case. This view of law can be called legal formalism. Even though this approach to the law seems to be intuitively acceptable, it has been under attack, at least from the early critiques of legal realists,since the beginning of the twentieth century. However, more rigid and more exact critiques of legal formalism and especially of the notion of legal determinacy have come from another approach. This contemporary approach to the law is called the critical law studies movement. It’s advocates have been criticizing not only legal determinacy but all aspects of modern western legal thought. They first view all of these modern legal approaches as a whole without distinguishing the differences between them (i.e. the two main traditions in modern legal theory: the natural law theories and legal positivism) and brand these approaches under the name legal liberalism. They then try to show the inner contradictions of this whole.

İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2011

... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler Çağdaş hukuk felsefesi tarihi, bir anlamda farklı hukuk kuramlar... more ... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler Çağdaş hukuk felsefesi tarihi, bir anlamda farklı hukuk kuramlarının arasındaki çatışmaların tarihidir. ... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler, Adalet Meslek Yüksekokulu 1 Çağdaş hukuk felsefesinin bu çatışmalı doğası hakkında bkz. ...

John Hurton, Political Obligation, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, Humanities Press International, Inc., ... more John Hurton, Political Obligation, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, Humanities Press International, Inc., 1992, p. 4; Joseph Raz, “The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition”, Joseph Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain (Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, pp. 341-354, p. 341; Tony Honore, “Must We Obey? Necessity As A Ground of Obligation”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 67, 1981, pp. 39-61, pp. 39-40

... MÜFTÜLER, FETVALAR VE İSLAM HUKUKUNDA YORUM. Muhammed Khalid Masud,Brinkley Messick, David S.... more ... MÜFTÜLER, FETVALAR VE İSLAM HUKUKUNDA YORUM. Muhammed Khalid Masud,Brinkley Messick, David S. Powers, Gökçe Çataloluk, Sercan Gürler. Özet. ÖZET. Tam Metin: PDF. Refbacks. There are currently no refbacks.

On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2017

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Dec 1, 2016

Kurucu iktidar, Turk anayasa literaturunde cogunlukla ongorulemezlik, bilinemezlik, denetlenemezl... more Kurucu iktidar, Turk anayasa literaturunde cogunlukla ongorulemezlik, bilinemezlik, denetlenemezlik, sinirsizlik ve hukuk disilik gibi sifatlarla tavsif edildiginden pek uzerinde durulmayan, gormezden gelinen bir kavram olagelmistir. Hâlbuki hem ozel olarak anayasa teorisinin hem de genel hukuk felsefesinin en onemli konulari arasinda kurucu iktidar da yer alir. Bu anlamda kurucu iktidar sadece anayasayi yapan bir iktidar degil, toplumlarin bir siyasi birlige nasil donustugu, bir siyasi birlik olarak kendi kendisini nasil yonettigi, varlik sebebi ve siniri gibi meselelerin felsefi acidan incelenmesinde vazgecilmez bir kavramdir. Nitekim O. Vahdet Issevenler de Kurucu Iktidar (Anayasanin Maddi ve Fail Nedeni) isimli kitabinda Sokratik gelenekte karsimiza cikan “Nedenler Teorisi”ne basvurmak suretiyle kurucu iktidarin dogasi, niteligi ve islevi, anayasa ile iliskisi meselelerini “onto-teleolojik” bakisla ele aliyor ve kurucu iktidarin aslinda bir “taninma” iliskisine dayandigini, beli...

Annales De La Faculte De Droit D Istanbul, 2008

At first sight, the law seems to be a system of rules and the judges only adjudicators who work w... more At first sight, the law seems to be a system of rules and the judges only adjudicators who work within the mechanism of that system. That is, they make a decision about disputes only by using some basic logical equipment in order to apply some written laws. This means that there is a determinacy in the law and that rules determine the outcomes in every case. This view of law can be called legal formalism. Even though this approach to the law seems to be intuitively acceptable, it has been under attack, at least from the early critiques of legal realists,since the beginning of the twentieth century. However, more rigid and more exact critiques of legal formalism and especially of the notion of legal determinacy have come from another approach. This contemporary approach to the law is called the critical law studies movement. It’s advocates have been criticizing not only legal determinacy but all aspects of modern western legal thought. They first view all of these modern legal approaches as a whole without distinguishing the differences between them (i.e. the two main traditions in modern legal theory: the natural law theories and legal positivism) and brand these approaches under the name legal liberalism. They then try to show the inner contradictions of this whole.

İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2011

... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler Çağdaş hukuk felsefesi tarihi, bir anlamda farklı hukuk kuramlar... more ... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler Çağdaş hukuk felsefesi tarihi, bir anlamda farklı hukuk kuramlarının arasındaki çatışmaların tarihidir. ... Dr. Araş. Gör. Sercan Gürler, Adalet Meslek Yüksekokulu 1 Çağdaş hukuk felsefesinin bu çatışmalı doğası hakkında bkz. ...

John Hurton, Political Obligation, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, Humanities Press International, Inc., ... more John Hurton, Political Obligation, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, Humanities Press International, Inc., 1992, p. 4; Joseph Raz, “The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition”, Joseph Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain (Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, pp. 341-354, p. 341; Tony Honore, “Must We Obey? Necessity As A Ground of Obligation”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 67, 1981, pp. 39-61, pp. 39-40

... MÜFTÜLER, FETVALAR VE İSLAM HUKUKUNDA YORUM. Muhammed Khalid Masud,Brinkley Messick, David S.... more ... MÜFTÜLER, FETVALAR VE İSLAM HUKUKUNDA YORUM. Muhammed Khalid Masud,Brinkley Messick, David S. Powers, Gökçe Çataloluk, Sercan Gürler. Özet. ÖZET. Tam Metin: PDF. Refbacks. There are currently no refbacks.