Steve Bramall - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Steve Bramall

Research paper thumbnail of The Educational Significance of the Interface

Journal of Philosophy of Education, Feb 1, 2000

Research paper thumbnail of Afterword: Thoughts on moving philosophy outside

Research paper thumbnail of It's Good to Talk: Education and Hermeneutics in Conversation

Journal of Philosophy of Education, Nov 1, 1999

Research paper thumbnail of Opening Up Open-Mindedness

Educational Theory, Jun 1, 2000

Press, 1985). The debate between Hare, Terry McLaughlin, and Peter Gardner concerning the possibi... more Press, 1985). The debate between Hare, Terry McLaughlin, and Peter Gardner concerning the possibility and desirability of a person being open-minded about very strongly held beliefs has been conducted through the Journal of Philosophy of Education in the 1980s and 1990s. See Terry H. McLaughlin, "Peter Gardner on Religious Upbringing and the Liberal Ideal of Religious Autonomy,"

Research paper thumbnail of Why don’t we do it in the street?

The Philosophers’ Magazine, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Afterword: Thoughts on moving philosophy outside

Research paper thumbnail of It's Good to Talk: Education and Hermeneutics in Conversation

Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 1999

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in Higher Education

Increasingly the theory and practice of Philosophy with Children (P4C) is critiqued by

Research paper thumbnail of Understanding philosophy in communities: The spaces, people, politics and philosophy of Community Philosophy

Research paper thumbnail of The Educational Significance of the Interface

Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 2000

Research paper thumbnail of Opening Up Open-Mindedness

Educational Theory, 2000

Following the books by William Hare that established open-mindedness as a key feature of liberal ... more Following the books by William Hare that established open-mindedness as a key feature of liberal education, the debate about open-mindedness between, on the one hand Terry McLaughlin and William Hare, and on the other Peter Gardner, has been fruitful for those theorizing liberal education in at least three ways.' First, it has helped to articulate the value of open-mindedness to personal well-being; second, it has gone some way in clarifying and refining the liberal rationalist conception of open-mindedness; and third, it has provoked and informed debate about the extent to which the promotion of Open-mindedness is practicable in the context of modem education. Each of these achievements has clear relevance for educators. Together they help to inform the serious practical business of educating in a society whose members seek to promote liberal values.

Research paper thumbnail of Why don’t we do it in the street?

The Philosophers' Magazine, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Will the new National Curriculum live up to its aims?

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in Higher Education

Conference papers by Steve Bramall

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in higher education: …

Online, retrieved, Jan 1, 2009

Research paper thumbnail of The Educational Significance of the Interface

Journal of Philosophy of Education, Feb 1, 2000

Research paper thumbnail of Afterword: Thoughts on moving philosophy outside

Research paper thumbnail of It's Good to Talk: Education and Hermeneutics in Conversation

Journal of Philosophy of Education, Nov 1, 1999

Research paper thumbnail of Opening Up Open-Mindedness

Educational Theory, Jun 1, 2000

Press, 1985). The debate between Hare, Terry McLaughlin, and Peter Gardner concerning the possibi... more Press, 1985). The debate between Hare, Terry McLaughlin, and Peter Gardner concerning the possibility and desirability of a person being open-minded about very strongly held beliefs has been conducted through the Journal of Philosophy of Education in the 1980s and 1990s. See Terry H. McLaughlin, "Peter Gardner on Religious Upbringing and the Liberal Ideal of Religious Autonomy,"

Research paper thumbnail of Why don’t we do it in the street?

The Philosophers’ Magazine, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Afterword: Thoughts on moving philosophy outside

Research paper thumbnail of It's Good to Talk: Education and Hermeneutics in Conversation

Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 1999

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in Higher Education

Increasingly the theory and practice of Philosophy with Children (P4C) is critiqued by

Research paper thumbnail of Understanding philosophy in communities: The spaces, people, politics and philosophy of Community Philosophy

Research paper thumbnail of The Educational Significance of the Interface

Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 2000

Research paper thumbnail of Opening Up Open-Mindedness

Educational Theory, 2000

Following the books by William Hare that established open-mindedness as a key feature of liberal ... more Following the books by William Hare that established open-mindedness as a key feature of liberal education, the debate about open-mindedness between, on the one hand Terry McLaughlin and William Hare, and on the other Peter Gardner, has been fruitful for those theorizing liberal education in at least three ways.' First, it has helped to articulate the value of open-mindedness to personal well-being; second, it has gone some way in clarifying and refining the liberal rationalist conception of open-mindedness; and third, it has provoked and informed debate about the extent to which the promotion of Open-mindedness is practicable in the context of modem education. Each of these achievements has clear relevance for educators. Together they help to inform the serious practical business of educating in a society whose members seek to promote liberal values.

Research paper thumbnail of Why don’t we do it in the street?

The Philosophers' Magazine, 2013

Research paper thumbnail of Will the new National Curriculum live up to its aims?

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in Higher Education

Research paper thumbnail of What Philosophy with Children is not: responses to some critics and constructive suggestions for dialogue about the role of P4C in higher education: …

Online, retrieved, Jan 1, 2009

Log In