Sezin Topçu - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Papers by Sezin Topçu

Historienne et sociologue des techniques, Sezin Topcu a publie un ouvrage important sur La France... more Historienne et sociologue des techniques, Sezin Topcu a publie un ouvrage important sur La France nucleaire1 dans lequel elle a analyse le succes de la nuclearisation dans ce pays malgre les fortes resistances citoyennes. Nous revenons avec elle sur l’histoire de ces mouvements de contestation qui ont durablement faconne l’engagement ecologiste en France, mais aussi sur les techniques de pouvoir singulieres qui ont accompagne une nuclearisation francaise a marche forcee.

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2018

ISSN: 1370-0731 Pages: 24-1 Publication Title: Revue internationale de politique comparée (Imprim... more ISSN: 1370-0731 Pages: 24-1 Publication Title: Revue internationale de politique comparée (Imprimé)International audienc

McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks, Sep 15, 2022

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2021

This book presents an original interdisciplinary approach to the study of the so-called ‘recovery... more This book presents an original interdisciplinary approach to the study of the so-called ‘recovery phase’ in disaster management, centred on the notion of repairing. The volume advances thinking on disaster recovery that goes beyond institutional and managerial challenges, descriptions and analyses. It encourages socially, politically and ethically engaged questioning of what it means to recover after disaster. At the centre of this analysis, contributions examine the diversity of processes of repairing through which recovery can take place, and the varied meanings actors attribute to repair at different times and scales of such processes. It also analyses the multiple arenas (juridical, expert, political) in which actors struggle to make sense of the "what-ness" of a disaster and the paths for recovery. These struggles are interlinked with interest-based and power-based struggles which maintain structural inequality and exploitation, existing social hierarchies and established forms of marginality. The work uses case studies from all over the world, cutting-edge theoretical discussions and original empirical research to put critical and interpretative approaches in social sciences into dialogue, opening the venue for innovative approaches in the study of environmental disasters. This book will be of much interest to students of disaster management, sociology, anthropology, law and philosophy. Table of Contents Introduction: Recovery, Resilience and Repairing - For a Non-Reductionist Approach to the Complexity of Post-Disaster Situations Laura Centemeri, Sezin Topçu and J. Peter Burgess Part I: Repairing Slow Disasters 1. The Economy of Compensation and the Struggle for Reparation: The case of Formosa Plastics in Taiwan Paul Jobin 2. Repairing the Ir-repairable: ‘Geo-biological’ Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin Topçu 3. After the (Green) Revolution Comes (Ecological) Restoration: Scientists and Peasants in Pontal do Paranapanema, Brazil Daniel Delatin Rodrigues Part II: Everyday Life, Justice and Memories in Recovery after Disasters 4. Repairing as Struggle for Narrative Justice. The Dam Failure of Vega de Tera, Spain (1959-2019) Santiago Gorostiza and Marco Armiero 5. Preparing for Future Pandemics and Repairing Vulnerable Environments: Consequences of the 1997 Bird Flu Outbreak in Hong Kong Frédéric Keck 6. Broken Techno-Ecological Systems and Art as Reparative Gestures Line Marie Thorsen 7. Plurality of Temporalities, Complexity and Contingency in Repairing after Dam Failures in Minas Gerais Francis Chateauraynaud and Josquin Debaz Part III: The Role of Law in Repairing Environments 8. A Green Criminological Approach to Environmental Victimisation and Reparation. A Case for Environmental Restorative Justice Lorenzo Natali and Matthew Hall 9. Reenact, Commemorate and Make Amends after Storm Xynthia Through a Judicial Dispositif Sandrine Revet 10. Victims and the Ecologies of Reparation Dispositifs in the Contaminated Growth Hormone Case: Comparative Perspectives on Recovery after a Health Disaster Janine Barbot and Nicolas Dodier 11. Conclusion: Disaster recovery and the repairing perspective: between theory and practice Laura Centemeri, J. Peter Burgess and Sezin Topçu

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2018

Transitions énergétiques et changements politiques. Dossier thématique, Revue internationale de p... more Transitions énergétiques et changements politiques. Dossier thématique, Revue internationale de politique comparée, vol. 24, 2017/1-2 https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2017-1.htm Sommaire : Au-delà du consensus : l’impératif de la « transition énergétique » à l’épreuve du regard comparatif / Stefan C. Aykut, Aurélien Evrard, Sezin Topçu Une transition pour que rien ne change ? Changement institutionnel et dépendance au sentier dans les « transitions énergé..

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Nov 19, 2021

Repairing the Irreparable: Geobiological Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin ... more Repairing the Irreparable: Geobiological Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin Topçu biological 'sacrifice' of victims (for the sake of land recovery) as the (new) norm. I thus hope to contribute to the currently expanding social science literature on land management and reconstruction after a nuclear failure (see e.g. Kojima 2020), a question that has been put on the back burner for many years by analysts of nuclear accidents, who have invested their time instead in other important issues such as crisis management (Lagadec 1988), media coverage and political impacts (Liberatore 1999), environmental and health fallouts (Kuchinskaya 2014), construction of the public memory of catastrophes (Ardt 2012; Kasperski 2020) and compensation mechanisms and the long-term management of victimship (Petryna 2002;

İnsanlarin, her seye ragmen gerçekleri inkar etmek maksadiyla kafalarini kuma gömebilme yetisine ... more İnsanlarin, her seye ragmen gerçekleri inkar etmek maksadiyla kafalarini kuma gömebilme yetisine hayranim

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Jul 1, 2017

Le temps semble bien loin où Turquie était synonyme d’espoir. D’espoir mesuré, mais d’espoir tout... more Le temps semble bien loin où Turquie était synonyme d’espoir. D’espoir mesuré, mais d’espoir tout de même pour de nombreux-ses observateur-trice-s internationaux-nales, pour les mouvements de défense des droits humains, pour toutes les personnes que répugnait la théorie dite du « choc des civilisations ». Du côté des observateur.es externes, cet espoir était porté par une expérience politique originale, pour ne pas dire unique : un gouvernement aux racines islamistes mais se déclarant avant tout réformateur – bien que conservateur –, arrivé au pouvoir par la voie des urnes, prônant son attachement aux valeurs de la démocratie, du libéralisme et du pluralisme. Dans la première moitié des années 2000, le pouvoir turc multipliait les déclarations publiques et les initiatives concrètes visant à réduire la tutelle militaire, mais aussi à promouvoir des avancées sur certains dossiers sensibles, notamment la question kurde, la question arménienne et la question chypriote. Cette combinaison que proposait alors l’AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, Parti de la Justice et du Développement) s’appuyait sur, et encourageait l’ascension à la fois sociale et politique de nouveaux groupes sociaux longtemps tenus en marge. Le pays semblait se frayer un chemin vers une libéralisation à la fois économique – l’adoption des recettes néolibérales coïncidant avec une période de croissance remarquable – et politique. Cette ouverture politique a permis d’espérer, dans les rangs européens, une pérennité de la tendance à la libéralisation, au point qu’on a pu parler, au tournant des années 2010 et au moment des premiers printemps arabes, – brièvement, il est vrai – de « modèle turc » pour les pays de la région..

Natures Sciences Societes, Sep 1, 2006

McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks, Sep 15, 2022

Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances

Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe - HAL - SHS, 2022

The introduction reviews the most relevant existing approaches to the study of recovery after dis... more The introduction reviews the most relevant existing approaches to the study of recovery after disaster. It introduces a framework that is based on the analysis of repair processes and dispositifs, which is grounded in the assumption that any disaster situation is marked by the uncertainty of its 'what-ness'. This 'what-ness' depends on the diversity of actors experiencing its consequences and their involvement in a variety of processes of acknowledging, evaluating and managing these consequences at different scales. From this perspective, researching processes of recovery consists in following how the disaster and its consequences are made the object of a variety of struggles around the meaning of what happened and how it affected the given order of things and the possible future. The chapter illustrates how this approach overcomes some of the limitations of a recovery analysis framework that is based on the notion of resilience, pointing to the need to explore the multiple meanings of repairing environments in order to explain how communities recover after disaster. The chapter also highlights three different meanings of repairing in the field of recovery: repairing as redress, repairing as technical fixing and repairing as the everyday maintenance of one's own world in material, multispecies, experiential and emotional terms.

Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

Since the critique of science movements emerged in the 1970s, knowledge-power relationships in th... more Since the critique of science movements emerged in the 1970s, knowledge-power relationships in the technosciences have changed significantly. The mobilizations both of scientists to produce science for the people and of lay producers of knowledge and expertise have helped to remedy the perceived deficits of official science. STS research to date has abundantly and rather enthusiastically examined the forms and conditions of production of this critical, dissident, alternative knowledge, but few studies have looked at how scientific and political elites react to and engage with such knowledge-based mobilizations. Focusing on ways of governing techno-criticism, this article aims to contribute to filling this gap. It investigates the innovative capacity of social movements and public authorities as well as their capacity for renewal and ability to shift power relations in their favor, including in the inevitable crisis and scandal situations. Drawing on empirical evidence from a long-te...

The chapter clarifies how the approach to the study of post-disaster situations based on the expl... more The chapter clarifies how the approach to the study of post-disaster situations based on the exploration of multiple and diverse repairing processes is propitious to a cross-fertilization between disaster studies and current theoretical debates in social sciences. This dialogue is essential on the one hand, to allow a better understanding of disasters as expression of multiple systemic crises, including climate change, financial instabilities and the crisis of democratic legitimacy. On the other, these debates can feed the ‘sociological imagination’ of the field of disaster studies and contribute to developing the inclusive potential of policies aimed at supporting collective capacities of prevention, preparedness and response to disasters. In return, the dialogue between disaster studies and the theoretical perspectives currently developed in social sciences can help to clarify and test the operability of approaches otherwise condemned to remain just a paper exercise. In particular, the authors discuss the articulation of the reparative perspective with the systemic perspective that focuses on the interconnectedness of disasters, economic interests, globalisation, financialization and the ongoing dynamics of colonialism. In the final section, building on the debate on how to transform urban planning to meet climate change challenges, the authors discuss the perspective of design activism against ‘defuturing’ as a way to renew the understanding of recovery.

Sociologie du travail, 2013

Il etait temps de mettre le projecteur sur les lobbies industriels, ces acteurs discrets des nego... more Il etait temps de mettre le projecteur sur les lobbies industriels, ces acteurs discrets des negociations environnementales. Depuis ces dernieres annees, la « gouvernance » internationale de l’environnement a fait l’objet d’une vaste litterature en sciences sociales. Celle-ci s’est interessee en premier lieu aux decideurs facilement identifiables (Etats et organismes internationaux), aux organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) environnementalistes et aux dispositifs technico-juridiques desti...

Au-delà du consensus : l'impératif de la « transition énergétique » à l'épreuve du regard comparatif

Nature and Culture, 2008

This article adduces evidence of the central role played by scientists in the 1970s and “lay pers... more This article adduces evidence of the central role played by scientists in the 1970s and “lay persons” in the post-Chernobyl period in the production and legitimation of alternative types of knowledge and expertise on the environmental and health risks of nuclear energy in France. From a constructivist perspective, it argues that this shift in the relationship of “lay persons” to knowledge production is linked not only to the rise of mistrust vis-à-vis scientific institutions but also, and especially, to a change in the way they have reacted to “dependency” on institutions and to “state secrecy”. Counter-expertise is constructed as a politics of surveillance where alternative interpretations of risk are buttressed by a permanent critique of the epistemic assumptions of institutional expertise. The identity of “counter-expert” is socially elaborated within this process.

Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2011

... Auch in dieser Frage stimmt die Mehrheit der Berichte darin überein, dass die Bevölkerung die... more ... Auch in dieser Frage stimmt die Mehrheit der Berichte darin überein, dass die Bevölkerung die geologische Lage-rung sowie die Aufbereitung der Brennstäbe und der Kernabfälle deshalb ablehne, weil es ihr an wissenschaftlicher ... 102 Sezin Topçu · Kathia Serrano-Velarde ...

Historienne et sociologue des techniques, Sezin Topcu a publie un ouvrage important sur La France... more Historienne et sociologue des techniques, Sezin Topcu a publie un ouvrage important sur La France nucleaire1 dans lequel elle a analyse le succes de la nuclearisation dans ce pays malgre les fortes resistances citoyennes. Nous revenons avec elle sur l’histoire de ces mouvements de contestation qui ont durablement faconne l’engagement ecologiste en France, mais aussi sur les techniques de pouvoir singulieres qui ont accompagne une nuclearisation francaise a marche forcee.

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2018

ISSN: 1370-0731 Pages: 24-1 Publication Title: Revue internationale de politique comparée (Imprim... more ISSN: 1370-0731 Pages: 24-1 Publication Title: Revue internationale de politique comparée (Imprimé)International audienc

McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks, Sep 15, 2022

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2021

This book presents an original interdisciplinary approach to the study of the so-called ‘recovery... more This book presents an original interdisciplinary approach to the study of the so-called ‘recovery phase’ in disaster management, centred on the notion of repairing. The volume advances thinking on disaster recovery that goes beyond institutional and managerial challenges, descriptions and analyses. It encourages socially, politically and ethically engaged questioning of what it means to recover after disaster. At the centre of this analysis, contributions examine the diversity of processes of repairing through which recovery can take place, and the varied meanings actors attribute to repair at different times and scales of such processes. It also analyses the multiple arenas (juridical, expert, political) in which actors struggle to make sense of the "what-ness" of a disaster and the paths for recovery. These struggles are interlinked with interest-based and power-based struggles which maintain structural inequality and exploitation, existing social hierarchies and established forms of marginality. The work uses case studies from all over the world, cutting-edge theoretical discussions and original empirical research to put critical and interpretative approaches in social sciences into dialogue, opening the venue for innovative approaches in the study of environmental disasters. This book will be of much interest to students of disaster management, sociology, anthropology, law and philosophy. Table of Contents Introduction: Recovery, Resilience and Repairing - For a Non-Reductionist Approach to the Complexity of Post-Disaster Situations Laura Centemeri, Sezin Topçu and J. Peter Burgess Part I: Repairing Slow Disasters 1. The Economy of Compensation and the Struggle for Reparation: The case of Formosa Plastics in Taiwan Paul Jobin 2. Repairing the Ir-repairable: ‘Geo-biological’ Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin Topçu 3. After the (Green) Revolution Comes (Ecological) Restoration: Scientists and Peasants in Pontal do Paranapanema, Brazil Daniel Delatin Rodrigues Part II: Everyday Life, Justice and Memories in Recovery after Disasters 4. Repairing as Struggle for Narrative Justice. The Dam Failure of Vega de Tera, Spain (1959-2019) Santiago Gorostiza and Marco Armiero 5. Preparing for Future Pandemics and Repairing Vulnerable Environments: Consequences of the 1997 Bird Flu Outbreak in Hong Kong Frédéric Keck 6. Broken Techno-Ecological Systems and Art as Reparative Gestures Line Marie Thorsen 7. Plurality of Temporalities, Complexity and Contingency in Repairing after Dam Failures in Minas Gerais Francis Chateauraynaud and Josquin Debaz Part III: The Role of Law in Repairing Environments 8. A Green Criminological Approach to Environmental Victimisation and Reparation. A Case for Environmental Restorative Justice Lorenzo Natali and Matthew Hall 9. Reenact, Commemorate and Make Amends after Storm Xynthia Through a Judicial Dispositif Sandrine Revet 10. Victims and the Ecologies of Reparation Dispositifs in the Contaminated Growth Hormone Case: Comparative Perspectives on Recovery after a Health Disaster Janine Barbot and Nicolas Dodier 11. Conclusion: Disaster recovery and the repairing perspective: between theory and practice Laura Centemeri, J. Peter Burgess and Sezin Topçu

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2018

Transitions énergétiques et changements politiques. Dossier thématique, Revue internationale de p... more Transitions énergétiques et changements politiques. Dossier thématique, Revue internationale de politique comparée, vol. 24, 2017/1-2 https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2017-1.htm Sommaire : Au-delà du consensus : l’impératif de la « transition énergétique » à l’épreuve du regard comparatif / Stefan C. Aykut, Aurélien Evrard, Sezin Topçu Une transition pour que rien ne change ? Changement institutionnel et dépendance au sentier dans les « transitions énergé..

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Nov 19, 2021

Repairing the Irreparable: Geobiological Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin ... more Repairing the Irreparable: Geobiological Recovery of Environments after a Nuclear Disaster Sezin Topçu biological 'sacrifice' of victims (for the sake of land recovery) as the (new) norm. I thus hope to contribute to the currently expanding social science literature on land management and reconstruction after a nuclear failure (see e.g. Kojima 2020), a question that has been put on the back burner for many years by analysts of nuclear accidents, who have invested their time instead in other important issues such as crisis management (Lagadec 1988), media coverage and political impacts (Liberatore 1999), environmental and health fallouts (Kuchinskaya 2014), construction of the public memory of catastrophes (Ardt 2012; Kasperski 2020) and compensation mechanisms and the long-term management of victimship (Petryna 2002;

İnsanlarin, her seye ragmen gerçekleri inkar etmek maksadiyla kafalarini kuma gömebilme yetisine ... more İnsanlarin, her seye ragmen gerçekleri inkar etmek maksadiyla kafalarini kuma gömebilme yetisine hayranim

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Jul 1, 2017

Le temps semble bien loin où Turquie était synonyme d’espoir. D’espoir mesuré, mais d’espoir tout... more Le temps semble bien loin où Turquie était synonyme d’espoir. D’espoir mesuré, mais d’espoir tout de même pour de nombreux-ses observateur-trice-s internationaux-nales, pour les mouvements de défense des droits humains, pour toutes les personnes que répugnait la théorie dite du « choc des civilisations ». Du côté des observateur.es externes, cet espoir était porté par une expérience politique originale, pour ne pas dire unique : un gouvernement aux racines islamistes mais se déclarant avant tout réformateur – bien que conservateur –, arrivé au pouvoir par la voie des urnes, prônant son attachement aux valeurs de la démocratie, du libéralisme et du pluralisme. Dans la première moitié des années 2000, le pouvoir turc multipliait les déclarations publiques et les initiatives concrètes visant à réduire la tutelle militaire, mais aussi à promouvoir des avancées sur certains dossiers sensibles, notamment la question kurde, la question arménienne et la question chypriote. Cette combinaison que proposait alors l’AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, Parti de la Justice et du Développement) s’appuyait sur, et encourageait l’ascension à la fois sociale et politique de nouveaux groupes sociaux longtemps tenus en marge. Le pays semblait se frayer un chemin vers une libéralisation à la fois économique – l’adoption des recettes néolibérales coïncidant avec une période de croissance remarquable – et politique. Cette ouverture politique a permis d’espérer, dans les rangs européens, une pérennité de la tendance à la libéralisation, au point qu’on a pu parler, au tournant des années 2010 et au moment des premiers printemps arabes, – brièvement, il est vrai – de « modèle turc » pour les pays de la région..

Natures Sciences Societes, Sep 1, 2006

McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks, Sep 15, 2022

Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances

Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe - HAL - SHS, 2022

The introduction reviews the most relevant existing approaches to the study of recovery after dis... more The introduction reviews the most relevant existing approaches to the study of recovery after disaster. It introduces a framework that is based on the analysis of repair processes and dispositifs, which is grounded in the assumption that any disaster situation is marked by the uncertainty of its 'what-ness'. This 'what-ness' depends on the diversity of actors experiencing its consequences and their involvement in a variety of processes of acknowledging, evaluating and managing these consequences at different scales. From this perspective, researching processes of recovery consists in following how the disaster and its consequences are made the object of a variety of struggles around the meaning of what happened and how it affected the given order of things and the possible future. The chapter illustrates how this approach overcomes some of the limitations of a recovery analysis framework that is based on the notion of resilience, pointing to the need to explore the multiple meanings of repairing environments in order to explain how communities recover after disaster. The chapter also highlights three different meanings of repairing in the field of recovery: repairing as redress, repairing as technical fixing and repairing as the everyday maintenance of one's own world in material, multispecies, experiential and emotional terms.

Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

Since the critique of science movements emerged in the 1970s, knowledge-power relationships in th... more Since the critique of science movements emerged in the 1970s, knowledge-power relationships in the technosciences have changed significantly. The mobilizations both of scientists to produce science for the people and of lay producers of knowledge and expertise have helped to remedy the perceived deficits of official science. STS research to date has abundantly and rather enthusiastically examined the forms and conditions of production of this critical, dissident, alternative knowledge, but few studies have looked at how scientific and political elites react to and engage with such knowledge-based mobilizations. Focusing on ways of governing techno-criticism, this article aims to contribute to filling this gap. It investigates the innovative capacity of social movements and public authorities as well as their capacity for renewal and ability to shift power relations in their favor, including in the inevitable crisis and scandal situations. Drawing on empirical evidence from a long-te...

The chapter clarifies how the approach to the study of post-disaster situations based on the expl... more The chapter clarifies how the approach to the study of post-disaster situations based on the exploration of multiple and diverse repairing processes is propitious to a cross-fertilization between disaster studies and current theoretical debates in social sciences. This dialogue is essential on the one hand, to allow a better understanding of disasters as expression of multiple systemic crises, including climate change, financial instabilities and the crisis of democratic legitimacy. On the other, these debates can feed the ‘sociological imagination’ of the field of disaster studies and contribute to developing the inclusive potential of policies aimed at supporting collective capacities of prevention, preparedness and response to disasters. In return, the dialogue between disaster studies and the theoretical perspectives currently developed in social sciences can help to clarify and test the operability of approaches otherwise condemned to remain just a paper exercise. In particular, the authors discuss the articulation of the reparative perspective with the systemic perspective that focuses on the interconnectedness of disasters, economic interests, globalisation, financialization and the ongoing dynamics of colonialism. In the final section, building on the debate on how to transform urban planning to meet climate change challenges, the authors discuss the perspective of design activism against ‘defuturing’ as a way to renew the understanding of recovery.

Sociologie du travail, 2013

Il etait temps de mettre le projecteur sur les lobbies industriels, ces acteurs discrets des nego... more Il etait temps de mettre le projecteur sur les lobbies industriels, ces acteurs discrets des negociations environnementales. Depuis ces dernieres annees, la « gouvernance » internationale de l’environnement a fait l’objet d’une vaste litterature en sciences sociales. Celle-ci s’est interessee en premier lieu aux decideurs facilement identifiables (Etats et organismes internationaux), aux organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) environnementalistes et aux dispositifs technico-juridiques desti...

Au-delà du consensus : l'impératif de la « transition énergétique » à l'épreuve du regard comparatif

Nature and Culture, 2008

This article adduces evidence of the central role played by scientists in the 1970s and “lay pers... more This article adduces evidence of the central role played by scientists in the 1970s and “lay persons” in the post-Chernobyl period in the production and legitimation of alternative types of knowledge and expertise on the environmental and health risks of nuclear energy in France. From a constructivist perspective, it argues that this shift in the relationship of “lay persons” to knowledge production is linked not only to the rise of mistrust vis-à-vis scientific institutions but also, and especially, to a change in the way they have reacted to “dependency” on institutions and to “state secrecy”. Counter-expertise is constructed as a politics of surveillance where alternative interpretations of risk are buttressed by a permanent critique of the epistemic assumptions of institutional expertise. The identity of “counter-expert” is socially elaborated within this process.

Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2011

... Auch in dieser Frage stimmt die Mehrheit der Berichte darin überein, dass die Bevölkerung die... more ... Auch in dieser Frage stimmt die Mehrheit der Berichte darin überein, dass die Bevölkerung die geologische Lage-rung sowie die Aufbereitung der Brennstäbe und der Kernabfälle deshalb ablehne, weil es ihr an wissenschaftlicher ... 102 Sezin Topçu · Kathia Serrano-Velarde ...