Ursula Griebler - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Ursula Griebler
Systematic reviews, May 15, 2024
Research Synthesis Methods, Jul 21, 2023
The Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group (RRMG) first released interim guidance in March 2020 to s... more The Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group (RRMG) first released interim guidance in March 2020 to support authors in conducting rapid reviews (RRs). The objective of this mixed‐methods study was to assess the adherence and investigate authors' understanding of the RRMG guidance. We identified all documents citing the Interim Cochrane RRMG guidance up to February 17, 2022 and performed an exploratory adherence analysis. We interviewed 20 RR authors to assess the recommendations' comprehensibility and reasons for any deviations. Further, we surveyed nine authors of COVID‐19‐related Cochrane reviews for their reasons for not conducting a RR. We analyzed 128 RRs (111 non‐Cochrane, 17 Cochrane) that cited the RRMG guidance. Several recommendations were not followed by a large proportion of RR authors such as stepwise approach to study design inclusion or peer review of search strategies, whereas others were exceeded, for example, dual independent screening of abstracts/full texts. The most reported reasons for deviating from the guidance were time constraints, unclarities in the recommended approach, or inapplicability to the specific RR. Overall, the guidance was viewed as user‐friendly; however, without pre‐existing knowledge of systematic review (SR) conduct, the application was perceived as difficult. The main reasons for conducting a full SR over a RR were late availability of the guidance, preset mandate to conduct a SR, uncertainty regarding methodological distinctions between SR and RR, and inapplicability to the evidence base. Clarifications are warranted throughout the Interim Cochrane RRMG guidance to ensure that users with various experience levels can understand and apply its recommendations accordingly.
Gesundheitswesen, May 1, 2020
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Jun 3, 2023
doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by pee... more doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
The Cochrane library, Oct 16, 2016
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Environmental interventions (dust control) compared to no intervention... more Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Environmental interventions (dust control) compared to no intervention or another intervention not aimed to influence domestic lead exposure, Outcome 4 Blood lead level ≥ 10.0 µg/dL (dichotomous): ICC 0.
Research Square (Research Square), Apr 26, 2020
The Cochrane library, Sep 11, 2020
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews REFE... more Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews REFERENCES References to studies included in this review Bodker 2015 (supporting study) {published data only} Bødker M, Pisinger C, To U, Jørgensen T. The Danish fat taxe ects on consumption patterns and risk of ischaemic heart disease.
The Cochrane library, Apr 9, 2020
We searched CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase and 15 other databa... more We searched CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase and 15 other databases and trials registers on 12 September 2019. We handsearched the reference list of all records of included studies, searched websites of international organisations and institutions, and contacted review advisory group members to identify planned, ongoing or unpublished studies.
American Journal of Public Health
Search Strategy. (DOCX 21 kb)
Study characteristics and summary of results for NCD risk factors. (DOCX 27 kb)
Study characteristics and summary of results for incidence or prevalence of NCDs. (DOCX 47 kb)
Additional file 2. Supplementary tables
Additional file 1. Search strategies
Hintergrund/Fragestellung: Entscheidungen im Public Health Bereich sollen auf Basis der besten Ev... more Hintergrund/Fragestellung: Entscheidungen im Public Health Bereich sollen auf Basis der besten Evidenz getroffen werden. Gute Kommunikation zwischen Stakeholdern ist ein förderlicher Faktor für den Einbezug von Evidenz bei Entscheidungen. Es ist aber wahrscheinlich, dass Stakeholder aus[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]
The revised summary format applied to the Cochrane review on 'Portion, package or tableware s... more The revised summary format applied to the Cochrane review on 'Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco' (in English). (DOCX 122 kb)
The interview guide as used in the user testing (in German). (DOCX 48Â kb)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess... more This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of taxation of fat content in food on consumption of total fat and saturated fat, energy intake, overweight, obesity, and other adverse health outcomes in the general population.
23. wissenschaftliche Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Public Health (ÖGPH), 2020
Systematic reviews, May 15, 2024
Research Synthesis Methods, Jul 21, 2023
The Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group (RRMG) first released interim guidance in March 2020 to s... more The Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group (RRMG) first released interim guidance in March 2020 to support authors in conducting rapid reviews (RRs). The objective of this mixed‐methods study was to assess the adherence and investigate authors' understanding of the RRMG guidance. We identified all documents citing the Interim Cochrane RRMG guidance up to February 17, 2022 and performed an exploratory adherence analysis. We interviewed 20 RR authors to assess the recommendations' comprehensibility and reasons for any deviations. Further, we surveyed nine authors of COVID‐19‐related Cochrane reviews for their reasons for not conducting a RR. We analyzed 128 RRs (111 non‐Cochrane, 17 Cochrane) that cited the RRMG guidance. Several recommendations were not followed by a large proportion of RR authors such as stepwise approach to study design inclusion or peer review of search strategies, whereas others were exceeded, for example, dual independent screening of abstracts/full texts. The most reported reasons for deviating from the guidance were time constraints, unclarities in the recommended approach, or inapplicability to the specific RR. Overall, the guidance was viewed as user‐friendly; however, without pre‐existing knowledge of systematic review (SR) conduct, the application was perceived as difficult. The main reasons for conducting a full SR over a RR were late availability of the guidance, preset mandate to conduct a SR, uncertainty regarding methodological distinctions between SR and RR, and inapplicability to the evidence base. Clarifications are warranted throughout the Interim Cochrane RRMG guidance to ensure that users with various experience levels can understand and apply its recommendations accordingly.
Gesundheitswesen, May 1, 2020
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Jun 3, 2023
doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by pee... more doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
The Cochrane library, Oct 16, 2016
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Environmental interventions (dust control) compared to no intervention... more Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Environmental interventions (dust control) compared to no intervention or another intervention not aimed to influence domestic lead exposure, Outcome 4 Blood lead level ≥ 10.0 µg/dL (dichotomous): ICC 0.
Research Square (Research Square), Apr 26, 2020
The Cochrane library, Sep 11, 2020
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews REFE... more Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews REFERENCES References to studies included in this review Bodker 2015 (supporting study) {published data only} Bødker M, Pisinger C, To U, Jørgensen T. The Danish fat taxe ects on consumption patterns and risk of ischaemic heart disease.
The Cochrane library, Apr 9, 2020
We searched CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase and 15 other databa... more We searched CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase and 15 other databases and trials registers on 12 September 2019. We handsearched the reference list of all records of included studies, searched websites of international organisations and institutions, and contacted review advisory group members to identify planned, ongoing or unpublished studies.
American Journal of Public Health
Search Strategy. (DOCX 21 kb)
Study characteristics and summary of results for NCD risk factors. (DOCX 27 kb)
Study characteristics and summary of results for incidence or prevalence of NCDs. (DOCX 47 kb)
Additional file 2. Supplementary tables
Additional file 1. Search strategies
Hintergrund/Fragestellung: Entscheidungen im Public Health Bereich sollen auf Basis der besten Ev... more Hintergrund/Fragestellung: Entscheidungen im Public Health Bereich sollen auf Basis der besten Evidenz getroffen werden. Gute Kommunikation zwischen Stakeholdern ist ein förderlicher Faktor für den Einbezug von Evidenz bei Entscheidungen. Es ist aber wahrscheinlich, dass Stakeholder aus[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]
The revised summary format applied to the Cochrane review on 'Portion, package or tableware s... more The revised summary format applied to the Cochrane review on 'Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco' (in English). (DOCX 122 kb)
The interview guide as used in the user testing (in German). (DOCX 48Â kb)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess... more This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of taxation of fat content in food on consumption of total fat and saturated fat, energy intake, overweight, obesity, and other adverse health outcomes in the general population.
23. wissenschaftliche Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Public Health (ÖGPH), 2020