Yasir Dewan - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Yasir Dewan

Uploads

Papers by Yasir Dewan

Research paper thumbnail of Origins of Organizational Stigma: A Quantitative Analysis

Proceedings - Academy of Management, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Bringing Counterclaimants in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Media Coverage of Firms

Academy of Management Proceedings

Research paper thumbnail of Origins of Organizational Stigma: A Quantitative Analysis

Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Single-actor Scandal or Multiple-actor Scandal? A Framework for Studying Scandal Dynamics

Research in the sociology of organizations, Jul 24, 2023

Research paper thumbnail of Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Role of Status and Ideology

This study focuses on how scandal shapes the effect of social status in labeling of an alleged vi... more This study focuses on how scandal shapes the effect of social status in labeling of an alleged violation of rules and norms as misconduct by social control agents. It suggests that organizational status is likely to be a liability than an asset when alleged violation is part of a more widespread scandal. Specifically, an alleged violation by high-status organization is more likely to be labeled as misconduct when the alleged violation is part of wider scandal compared to when it is a stand-alone violation. This is because scandal triggers socio-political mechanisms that decreases the protective benefits of status and augments the potential hazards of status, making status a liability during a widespread scandal. Focusing empirically on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the focal social control agent and the SEC enforcement action as labeling of misconduct, we found that status in itself neither protects nor exposes organizations to the enforcement actions but that status increases the likelihood of the enforcement action when misconduct is part of a scandal.

Research paper thumbnail of Scandal, Ideology, and Stigma

Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021

This study focuses on event-based organizational stigma during scandals through an inductive, mul... more This study focuses on event-based organizational stigma during scandals through an inductive, multiple-case research design. Focusing empirically on the stigmatization by newspapers during scandals...

Research paper thumbnail of Single-actor scandal or multiple-actor scandal? A framework for studying scandal dynamics

Research paper thumbnail of Catching the Big Fish: The Role of Scandals in Making Status a Liability

Academy of Management Journal

Research paper thumbnail of Origins of Organizational Stigma: A Quantitative Analysis

Proceedings - Academy of Management, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Bringing Counterclaimants in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Media Coverage of Firms

Academy of Management Proceedings

Research paper thumbnail of Origins of Organizational Stigma: A Quantitative Analysis

Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of Single-actor Scandal or Multiple-actor Scandal? A Framework for Studying Scandal Dynamics

Research in the sociology of organizations, Jul 24, 2023

Research paper thumbnail of Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Role of Status and Ideology

This study focuses on how scandal shapes the effect of social status in labeling of an alleged vi... more This study focuses on how scandal shapes the effect of social status in labeling of an alleged violation of rules and norms as misconduct by social control agents. It suggests that organizational status is likely to be a liability than an asset when alleged violation is part of a more widespread scandal. Specifically, an alleged violation by high-status organization is more likely to be labeled as misconduct when the alleged violation is part of wider scandal compared to when it is a stand-alone violation. This is because scandal triggers socio-political mechanisms that decreases the protective benefits of status and augments the potential hazards of status, making status a liability during a widespread scandal. Focusing empirically on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the focal social control agent and the SEC enforcement action as labeling of misconduct, we found that status in itself neither protects nor exposes organizations to the enforcement actions but that status increases the likelihood of the enforcement action when misconduct is part of a scandal.

Research paper thumbnail of Scandal, Ideology, and Stigma

Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021

This study focuses on event-based organizational stigma during scandals through an inductive, mul... more This study focuses on event-based organizational stigma during scandals through an inductive, multiple-case research design. Focusing empirically on the stigmatization by newspapers during scandals...

Research paper thumbnail of Single-actor scandal or multiple-actor scandal? A framework for studying scandal dynamics

Research paper thumbnail of Catching the Big Fish: The Role of Scandals in Making Status a Liability

Academy of Management Journal

Log In