bagher talebidarabi - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by bagher talebidarabi
Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, Apr 29, 2024
فصلنامه تخصصی هفت آسمان , 2010
این مقاله ترجمه بخشی از کتاب هنگراف است که اصل کتاب در دست ترجمه است. چنلینگ یا وساطت روحی و جایگ... more این مقاله ترجمه بخشی از کتاب هنگراف است که اصل کتاب در دست ترجمه است. چنلینگ یا وساطت روحی و جایگاه آن در معنویت گرایی عصر جدید توضیح داده شده است. در این مقاله اشاره ای نیز به تمایز وحی و چنلینگ شده است. توضیح آخر مقاله در باره برخی آثار ناشی از وساطت روحی جالب توجه اشت.
Comparative Theology, 2018
It is more than 30 years that attending inter-religious meetings and symposiums has been on the a... more It is more than 30 years that attending inter-religious meetings and symposiums has been on the agenda of some of the Iran's religious and social institutions. Those who have been and are still active in this area, as well as the different approaches they choose are an important source of analysis in terms of knowledge and experience. This research seeks to understand the knowledge and experience of the activists of the area and their critical interpretation of inter-religious dialogue and to provide a systematic analysis of it by constructing and systematizing its respective themes. Therefore, this research has been conducted with descriptive-analytic approach and qualitative method. For this purpose, along with theoretical findings, we have tried to collect empirical data using semi-structured interview techniques. The sampling method is purposeful and theoretical saturation criterion is an interview with 15 activists in this field. Thematic analysis method is also used for data analysis. Analyzing the findings, it became clear that the critics did not pay close attention to the religious and denominational origins of the subjects and were neutral in their critical analysis of them. Hence, their view to "the other" and the dialogue is "extra-religious" and they acknowledge the views and the ideas of this field in political and cultural terms and analyze them on this framework. In this approach, originality is with "the other" and the theological pluralism viewpoint is governed. Hence, dialogue with another-religious is not considered to be religious, but as an ethical-based subject. Through dialogue, critics do not seek to prove legitimacy, but consider their action as a means of looking at another according to moral standards, acting on ethical imperatives and sharing and generalizing ethics in controversial
Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, Apr 29, 2024
فصلنامه تخصصی هفت آسمان , 2010
این مقاله ترجمه بخشی از کتاب هنگراف است که اصل کتاب در دست ترجمه است. چنلینگ یا وساطت روحی و جایگ... more این مقاله ترجمه بخشی از کتاب هنگراف است که اصل کتاب در دست ترجمه است. چنلینگ یا وساطت روحی و جایگاه آن در معنویت گرایی عصر جدید توضیح داده شده است. در این مقاله اشاره ای نیز به تمایز وحی و چنلینگ شده است. توضیح آخر مقاله در باره برخی آثار ناشی از وساطت روحی جالب توجه اشت.
Comparative Theology, 2018
It is more than 30 years that attending inter-religious meetings and symposiums has been on the a... more It is more than 30 years that attending inter-religious meetings and symposiums has been on the agenda of some of the Iran's religious and social institutions. Those who have been and are still active in this area, as well as the different approaches they choose are an important source of analysis in terms of knowledge and experience. This research seeks to understand the knowledge and experience of the activists of the area and their critical interpretation of inter-religious dialogue and to provide a systematic analysis of it by constructing and systematizing its respective themes. Therefore, this research has been conducted with descriptive-analytic approach and qualitative method. For this purpose, along with theoretical findings, we have tried to collect empirical data using semi-structured interview techniques. The sampling method is purposeful and theoretical saturation criterion is an interview with 15 activists in this field. Thematic analysis method is also used for data analysis. Analyzing the findings, it became clear that the critics did not pay close attention to the religious and denominational origins of the subjects and were neutral in their critical analysis of them. Hence, their view to "the other" and the dialogue is "extra-religious" and they acknowledge the views and the ideas of this field in political and cultural terms and analyze them on this framework. In this approach, originality is with "the other" and the theological pluralism viewpoint is governed. Hence, dialogue with another-religious is not considered to be religious, but as an ethical-based subject. Through dialogue, critics do not seek to prove legitimacy, but consider their action as a means of looking at another according to moral standards, acting on ethical imperatives and sharing and generalizing ethics in controversial