charles ochem - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by charles ochem
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 2021
The crime of genocide has historical antecedents, dating back to several decades before its event... more The crime of genocide has historical antecedents, dating back to several decades before its eventual acceptance as an international crime and codified as such. Ironically, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948 (the Genocide Convention) did not provide punishment for the crime of genocide or genocide related matters. Instead, it empowered the Contracting Parties to undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide. But this lacuna is covered in Part 7 of Article 77 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC Statute), which provides applicable penalties for a person convicted of genocide or genocide related matters. Generally, conducts that amount to genocide are clear even though definition of the four classes of group 'is an intricate problem that requires serious interpretative efforts'. This paper examines the crime of genocide under the Statute of the International Criminal Court. The paper begins by examining the general overview of the crime of genocide by way of introduction and historical background; and then proceeds to appraise the very nature of the crime and the requirement of proving the offence. Noting the difficulties associated with proving the crime of genocide, particularly 'intent', the paper examines situations wherein inference can be drawn. The paper concludes with overarching recommendations.
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 2021
The crime of genocide has historical antecedents, dating back to several decades before its event... more The crime of genocide has historical antecedents, dating back to several decades before its eventual acceptance as an international crime and codified as such. Ironically, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948 (the Genocide Convention) did not provide punishment for the crime of genocide or genocide related matters. Instead, it empowered the Contracting Parties to undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide. But this lacuna is covered in Part 7 of Article 77 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC Statute), which provides applicable penalties for a person convicted of genocide or genocide related matters. Generally, conducts that amount to genocide are clear even though definition of the four classes of group 'is an intricate problem that requires serious interpretative efforts'. This paper examines the crime of genocide under the Statute of the International Criminal Court. The paper begins by examining the general overview of the crime of genocide by way of introduction and historical background; and then proceeds to appraise the very nature of the crime and the requirement of proving the offence. Noting the difficulties associated with proving the crime of genocide, particularly 'intent', the paper examines situations wherein inference can be drawn. The paper concludes with overarching recommendations.