evie sardjana - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by evie sardjana
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2019
The objective of research was to analyze the effect of remuneration, work discipline, and motivat... more The objective of research was to analyze the effect of remuneration, work discipline, and motivation on employee performance, both partially and simultaneously. This study employed descriptive and quantitative methods with linear regression. The sampling technique used was Stratified Random Sampling with 68 employees being the sample. The result of research showed that: 1) tstatistic = 2.857 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that Remuneration affects discipline significantly, 2) tstatistic= 5.375 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that remuneration affects motivation significantly, 3) tstatistic= 0.229 < ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that discipline does not affect performance significantly, 4) tstatistic= 1.962 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that motivation affects performance significantly; 5) t statistic = 2.470 > t table = 1.663 (pada α = 5%), meaning that remuneration affects employee performance, 6) Fstatistic = 4.955 > Ftable = 2.710 (sig...
UNS (Sebelas Maret University), 2019
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2019
The objective of research was to analyze the effect of remuneration, work discipline, and motivat... more The objective of research was to analyze the effect of remuneration, work discipline, and motivation on employee performance, both partially and simultaneously. This study employed descriptive and quantitative methods with linear regression. The sampling technique used was Stratified Random Sampling with 68 employees being the sample. The result of research showed that: 1) tstatistic = 2.857 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that Remuneration affects discipline significantly, 2) tstatistic= 5.375 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that remuneration affects motivation significantly, 3) tstatistic= 0.229 < ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that discipline does not affect performance significantly, 4) tstatistic= 1.962 > ttable = 1.663 (at α = 5%), meaning that motivation affects performance significantly; 5) t statistic = 2.470 > t table = 1.663 (pada α = 5%), meaning that remuneration affects employee performance, 6) Fstatistic = 4.955 > Ftable = 2.710 (sig...
UNS (Sebelas Maret University), 2019